scholarly journals Anchoring does not activate examples associated with the anchor value

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Štěpán Bahník

In the standard anchoring paradigm, people first compare a selected attribute of a target to a numeric value—an anchor. A subsequent absolute judgment of the target's attribute value is biased in the direction of the anchor. A prominent theory of the anchoring effect, the selective accessibility model, argues that people make the initial comparison by focusing on similarities between the target and the anchor, which activates information compatible with the anchor value being the target value. This activated information biases the subsequent estimate of the target value. To test the selective activation of information, the present study asked people to provide an example of the target's category following its comparison with an anchor. The attribute values of the provided examples were not biased in the direction of the anchor. However, they were positively associated with estimates of the target value. The study thus provides evidence for the use of activated information in the absolute judgment in the standard anchoring paradigm, but it does not show the selective activation of information compatible with the anchor value predicted by the selective accessibility model.

1975 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 671-677 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan A. Locke

36 normal, 36 schizophrenic, and 36 neurologically impaired Ss were compared for their ability to temporally discriminate brief auditory stimuli. The experimental task was the absolute judgment of 3, 5, or 9 stimuli ranging in duration from 0.10 to 1.90 sec. Half of the Ss in each group were “assisted” by the presentation of a repeated mid-series anchor. The interval between the presentation of the anchor and the variable stimuli was varied. With the addition of a mid-series anchor, normal Ss demonstrated an increase in information transmission and a decrease in response stereotypy; schizophrenics demonstrated a slight decrease in information transmission and a slight increase in response stereotypy; neurologically impaired Ss were essentially unaffected. Changes in interstimulus interval on the anchored judgment task did not influence information transmission.


1929 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 490-501 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Gahagan

1934 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 485-503 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. H. Wedell

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 186-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Aruffo ◽  
Robert L. Goldstone ◽  
David J. D. Earn

When a musical tone is sounded, most listeners are unable to identify its pitch by name. Those listeners who can identify pitches are said to have absolute pitch perception (AP). A limited subset of musicians possesses AP, and it has been debated whether musicians’ AP interferes with their ability to perceive tonal relationships between pitches, or relative pitch (RP). The present study tested musicians’ discrimination of relative pitch categories, or intervals, by placing absolute pitch values in conflict with relative pitch categories. AP listeners perceived intervals categorically, and their judgments were not affected by absolute pitch values. These results indicate that AP listeners do not infer interval identities from the absolute values between tones, and that RP categories are salient musical concepts in both RP and AP musicianship.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Štěpán Bahník

The scale distortion theory of anchoring argues that people are influenced by a previously considered value, an anchor, because the anchor distorts the scale on which a subsequent judgment is made. The distortion of the scale is a momentary effect and it cannot persist even after consideration of a different value on the same scale. In the present study, participants were presented with anchors by comparing thirteen random numeric values on the same scale to thirteen different objects. Subsequent numeric estimates of objects’ attributes were influenced by the corresponding anchors even though the anchors were divided from the estimates by twelve questions pertaining to different values on the same scale. The numeric value considered immediately before the estimate did not have a considerable effect on the judgment. While the anchoring effect was robust, it was not caused by scale distortion. Other possible theories of the anchoring effect, such as the selective accessibility model, are compatible with the results.


1972 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 222-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Morton A. Heller ◽  
Carl Auerbach

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document