scholarly journals CRITERIA OF BUCKLING-RESTRAINED BRACES TO PREVENT OUT-OF-PLANE BUCKLING

Author(s):  
Tomohiro KINOSHITA ◽  
Yuji KOETAKA ◽  
Kazuo INOUE ◽  
Kunihiro IITANI
2014 ◽  
Vol 79 (706) ◽  
pp. 1919-1929
Author(s):  
Hitoshi OZAKI ◽  
Yoshinao KONISHI ◽  
Ryota MATSUI ◽  
Toru TAKEUCHI

2018 ◽  
Vol 763 ◽  
pp. 916-923
Author(s):  
Ben Sitler ◽  
Toru Takeuchi ◽  
Ryota Matsui

Buckling-restrained braces (BRBs) achieve large peak and cumulative ductility capacities by restricting yielding to an encased core, while maintaining global stability. However, stability is often governed by the connections and is sensitive to the end fixity provided by the adjacent framing and gusset, and flexural continuity between the neck and restrainer. This paper presents simple analytical methods to determine the flexural properties of these key components. Full-depth gusset stiffeners are found to be highly effective in increasing the out-of-plane rotational stiffness (KRg), equivalent to doubling the thickness. An equivalent connection is proposed to account for the adjacent framing (KRf), but this may be neglected if KRf > 10∙KRg. This is typically satisfied if a diaphragm slab and transverse beam are provided, but may exceed beam torsional bracing requirements. The restrainer end moment transfer capacity is extended to mortar-filled RHS restrainers, confirming that neck insert ratios of Lin/Bn > 2.0 are required for full continuity.


Author(s):  
Toru TAKEUCHI ◽  
Satoshi YAMADA ◽  
Madoka KITAGAWA ◽  
Kazuaki SUZUKI ◽  
Akira WADA

2018 ◽  
Vol 763 ◽  
pp. 908-915
Author(s):  
Jian Cui ◽  
Chin Long Lee ◽  
Gregory A. MacRae

During earthquakes, buckling restrained braces (BRBs) are likely subjected to both in-plane (INP) and out-of-plane (OOP) loadings simultaneously, therefore, BRBs are required to act robustly under combined INP and OOP loading. It is believed that the OOP loading will reduce the energy dissipation ability of BRBs. The intent of this study is to numerically investigate the performance of BRBs under combined INP and OOP loading with a finite element model of BRB with circular cross-section. Restraining concrete within the BRB is modeled as connector elements in the model and is proven to be an effective way. Simulation results show that the performance of BRBs under combined INP and OOP loading is not as good as that under the INP loading only and the energy dissipation ability is decreased by about 15% when the magnitude of OOP loading is equal to that of INP loading. Furthermore, the results give a deeper insight into the behaviour of BRBs under different combined OOP and INP loading histories.


2013 ◽  
Vol 139 (11) ◽  
pp. 1812-1822 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsuyoshi Hikino ◽  
Taichiro Okazaki ◽  
Koichi Kajiwara ◽  
Masayoshi Nakashima

Author(s):  
Tsuyoshi Hikino ◽  
Taichiro Okazaki ◽  
Kouichi Kajiwara ◽  
Masayoshi Nakashima

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document