scholarly journals Vulnerability assessment in and near Theodore Roosevelt National Park, North Dakota

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristen J. Valseth
Keyword(s):  
North Dakota ◽  
Vulnerability Assessment ◽  
National Park ◽  
Theodore Roosevelt ◽  
Theodore Roosevelt National Park

Great Plains

2020 ◽  
pp. 305-341
Author(s):  
Cohen &
Keyword(s):  
South Dakota ◽  
North Dakota ◽  
Great Plains ◽  
Public Transportation ◽  
National Park ◽  
Scientific Interest ◽  
Theodore Roosevelt ◽  
Essential Information ◽  
Theodore Roosevelt National Park ◽  
Sedgwick County

The chapter “Great Plains” explains about scientific and technological sites of adult interest in Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, and South Dakota, including Sedgwick County Zoo, Glore Psychiatric Museum, Hastings Museum, Theodore Roosevelt National Park, Woolaroc, and Mammoth Site. The traveler is provided with essential information, including addresses, telephone numbers, hours of entry, handicapped access, dining facilities, dates open and closed, available public transportation, and websites. Nearly every site included here has been visited by the authors. Although written with scientists in mind, this book is for anyone who likes to travel and visit places of historical and scientific interest. Included are photographs of many sites within each state.

Shale Resources, Parks Conservation, and Contested Public Lands in North Dakota’s Theodore Roosevelt National Park: Is Fracking Booming?

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Miriam R. Aczel ◽  
Karen E. Makuch
Keyword(s):  
National Park ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
The United States ◽  
Federal Agencies ◽  
Cultural Significance ◽  
Theodore Roosevelt ◽  
Natural Beauty ◽  
Theodore Roosevelt National Park ◽  
Bakken Shale

This case study analyzes the potential impacts of weakening the National Park Service’s (NPS) “9B Regulations” enacted in 1978, which established a federal regulatory framework governing hydrocarbon rights and extraction to protect natural resources within the parks. We focus on potential risks to national parklands resulting from Executive Orders 13771—Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs [1]—and 13783—Promoting Energy Independence and Economic Growth [2]—and subsequent recent revisions and further deregulation. To establish context, we briefly overview the history of the United States NPS and other relevant federal agencies’ roles and responsibilities in protecting federal lands that have been set aside due to their value as areas of natural beauty or historical or cultural significance [3]. We present a case study of Theodore Roosevelt National Park (TRNP) situated within the Bakken Shale Formation—a lucrative region of oil and gas deposits—to examine potential impacts if areas of TRNP, particularly areas designated as “wilderness,” are opened to resource extraction, or if the development in other areas of the Bakken near or adjacent to the park’s boundaries expands [4]. We have chosen TRNP because of its biodiversity and rich environmental resources and location in the hydrocarbon-rich Bakken Shale. We discuss where federal agencies’ responsibility for the protection of these lands for future generations and their responsibility for oversight of mineral and petroleum resources development by private contractors have the potential for conflict.

scholarly journals Optimum Carrying Capacity for Bison in Theodore Roosevelt National Park

1983 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 89-92
Author(s):  
Clayton Marlow ◽  
Lynn Irby ◽  
Jack Norland
Keyword(s):  
Primary Productivity ◽  
Carrying Capacity ◽  
Food Habits ◽  
National Park ◽  
Net Primary Productivity ◽  
Theodore Roosevelt ◽  
Secondary Use ◽  
Theodore Roosevelt National Park ◽  
Management Priorities ◽  
Capacity Estimates

This project was designed to determine the optimum population size for bison in the Theodore Roosevelt National Park (TRNP) by fulfilling the following objectives: 1. Delineate primary and secondary areas of bison use. 2. Determine net primary productivity for major range sites within primary and secondary use areas. 3. Determine the general seasonal food habits of bison in TRNP. 4. Determine range trends under present population density of bison and the maximum carrying capacity of primary use areas. 5. Integrate range trend and carrying capacity estimates with management priorities for bison on the TRNP.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document