scholarly journals Repair of Complicated Multiple Incisional Hernia on One Patient: Erlangen InlayOnlay Mesh Repair Combined with Extended Spider-Suture Technique

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Resit Demir ◽  
Resit Demir
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Incisional Hernia ◽  
Abdominal Wall ◽  
Mesh Repair ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Suture Technique ◽  
Sonographic Examination ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Upper Abdomen

Purpose: Surgical treatment of large ventral hernia after laparotomy is a challenge for surgeons. It becomes even more complicated if there is more than one hernia on the abdominal wall and patients have additional risk factors such as BMI> 30, severe CAD or lung problems. In the following work I would like to introduce you two patients who had exactly these constellations and who could be operated successfully by combining two surgical techniques. Methods: Two high-risk patients, first had a large median and one para median and the second had a median and in the left upper abdomen an incisional hernia. The median hernia was closed in both patients with a mesh according to the Erlangen-Inlay-Onlay Mesh Repair (EIOM) procedure. The lateral incisional hernias were closed with the so-called Extended Spider-Suture Technique (ESST). The patients were then followed up for two years. Results: Both patients were very satisfied after two years and would recommend the operation to others. The clinical and sonographic examination of the two patients showed no evidence of hernia recurrence. Conclusion: The combination of both surgical techniques EIOM and ESST showed that all types of abdominal wall hernias can be treated safely even in high-risk patients.

scholarly journals Does pre-emptive onlay mesh reinforcement of midline laparotomies reduce incidence of incisional hernia in high–risk patients?

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (7) ◽  
pp. 2300
Author(s):  
Hosam F. Abdelhameed ◽  
Samir A. Abdelmageed
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Incisional Hernia ◽  
Chronic Wound ◽  
Midline Laparotomy ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Wound Pain ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Onlay Mesh ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Background: One of the major morbidity after abdominal surgery is incisional hernia. In high risk patients its incidence reaches 11-20% despite various optimal closure techniques for midline laparotomy. Our aim is to evaluate the efficacy of onlay mesh placement in reducing the incidence of incisional hernia in those high risk patients.Methods: A total of 65 high risk patients suspected to develop post-operative incisional hernia underwent midline abdominal laparotomies. Patients were divided into two groups; group1 (30 patients) for whom the incision was closed by conventional method and group2 (35 patients) for whom the incision was closed with reinforcement by onlay polypropylene mesh. The primary end point was the occurrence of incisional hernia while the secondary end point was post-operative complications including subcutaneous seroma, chronic wound pain, and surgical site infection (SSI). Patients were followed up for two years.Results: The base line characteristics of the two groups were similar. The incidence of incisional hernia is significantly reduced 1/35 (2.8%) in group 2 while it was 6/30 (20%) in group 1. As regard seroma and chronic wound pain they increased in (group2) 6/35 (17.14%) and 5/35(14.28%) respectively compared to (group 1) which was 4/30 (13.33%) and 2/30 (6.66%). SSI occurred in 1/35 (2.85%) in group 2 and in 1/30 (3.33%) in group 1.Conclusions: Prophylactic onlay mesh reinforcement of the midline laparotomy for high risk patients can be used safely and markedly reduces the incidence of incisional hernia with little morbidity.

scholarly journals 1024 The Use of the Pedicled Anterolateral Thigh (ALT) Flap for the Reconstruction of Abdominal Wall Defects in High-Risk Patients: A Case Series and Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
N Newall ◽  
C Jones ◽  
W Ho ◽  
A Curnier
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Abdominal Wall ◽  
Abdominal Wall Reconstruction ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Anterolateral Thigh Flap ◽  
Abdominal Wall Defects ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Anterolateral Thigh ◽  
Risk Patients

Abstract Introduction The pedicled anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap is considered as a suitable option in complex abdominal wall reconstruction. Its use as a reconstructive option is infrequent in the literature, and to date, there has been no systematic review evaluating its long-term outcomes. We report our experience with the pedicled anterolateral thigh flap for abdominal wall reconstruction in high-risk patients. Method A prospective database was created for patients with abdominal wall defects treated with pedicled ALT with extended fascia lata flaps between 2014 and 2017. Patient demographics, aetiology, size, location of defect and post-operative results were reviewed. Abdominal defects were classified into the following zones: 1A, upper midline; 1B, lower midline; 2, upper quadrant; 3, lower quadrant. A systematic review of the literature was conducted using PUBMED and EMBASE. Results 4 patients (mean age 59.5 years, range 50-65 years) underwent reconstruction with pedicled ALT flaps. 3 flaps developed partial necrosis secondary to infection; 1 flap required surgical debridement, and 2 were managed conservatively. There was one flap failure, due to avulsion of the pedicle during inset. At mean follow up of 2.75 years (range 1 to 4 years) 3 patients have clinical bulging or herniation. Conclusions Review of the literature demonstrated 52 patients from 17 case series or reports. The overall infection and partial flap loss rates were both 6%. There were no reported flap failures. Our study demonstrates that the pedicled anterolateral thigh flap is an effective flap option for the repair of large defects of the abdominal wall in high-risk patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document