Hemoperfusion in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Patients Undergoing Aortic Arch Operation (HPAO)

Author(s):  
2020 ◽  
Vol 58 (5) ◽  
pp. 1027-1034 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raphaelle A Chemtob ◽  
Simon Fuglsang ◽  
Arnar Geirsson ◽  
Anders Ahlsson ◽  
Christian Olsson ◽  
...  

Abstract OBJECTIVES Stroke is a serious complication in patients with acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD). Previous studies investigating stroke in ATAAD patients have been limited by small cohorts and have shown diverging results. We sought to identify risk factors for stroke and to evaluate the effect of stroke on outcomes in surgical ATAAD patients. METHODS The Nordic Consortium for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection database included patients operated for ATAAD at 8 Scandinavian Hospitals between 2005 and 2014. RESULTS Stroke occurred in 177 (15.7%) out of 1128 patients. Patients with stroke presented more frequently with cerebral malperfusion (20.6% vs 6.3%, P < 0.001), syncope (30.6% vs 17.6%, P < 0.001), cardiogenic shock (33.1% vs 20.7%, P < 0.001) and pericardial tamponade (25.9% vs 14.7%, P < 0.001) and more often underwent total aortic arch replacement (10.7% vs 4.7%, P = 0.016), compared to patients without stroke. In the 86 patients presenting with cerebral malperfusion, 38.4% developed stroke. Thirty-day and 5-year mortality in patients with and without stroke were 27.1% vs 13.6% and 42.9% vs 25.6%, respectively. Stroke was an independent predictor of early- [odds ratio 2.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.34–3.05; P < 0.001] and midterm mortality (hazard ratio 1.68, 95% CI 1.27–2.23; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Stroke in ATAAD patients is associated with increased early- and midterm mortality. Preoperative cerebral malperfusion and impaired haemodynamics, as well as total aortic arch replacement, were more frequent among patients who developed stroke. Importantly, a large proportion of patients presenting with cerebral malperfusion did not develop a permanent stroke, indicating that signs of cerebral malperfusion should not be considered a contraindication for surgery.


2018 ◽  
Vol 105 (2) ◽  
pp. 505-512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernando Fleischman ◽  
Ramsey S. Elsayed ◽  
Robbin G. Cohen ◽  
James M. Tatum ◽  
S. Ram Kumar ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 338-341
Author(s):  
Yukinori Moriyama ◽  
Hitoshi Toyohira ◽  
Tamahiro Kinjho ◽  
Mikio Hukueda ◽  
Koichi Hisatomi ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander O. Makkinejad ◽  
Jeffrey Clemence ◽  
Elizabeth L. Norton ◽  
Linda Farhat ◽  
Xiao-Ting Wu ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 887-889
Author(s):  
Haley L.P. Owen ◽  
Jeffrey S. Quintana ◽  
Bryan Matysiak ◽  
Elena J. Holak ◽  
Sandeep Markan ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sung Joon Han ◽  
Man-Shik Shim ◽  
Woo Sik Han ◽  
Hyun Jin Cho ◽  
Min-Woong Kang ◽  
...  

Abstract The recent rise in minimally invasive cardiovascular procedures is being accompanied by an increase in related complications. We report on an acute type A aortic dissection performed in an 82-year-old man 1 week after staged ‘zone 0’ hybrid thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Previously, the patient had undergone type I hybrid arch debranching and staged ‘zone 0’ TEVAR for an aortic arch aneurysm. ‘Zone 0’ TEVAR after type I hybrid debranching might increase the risk for aortic injury on the residual native aorta and should, therefore, be closely followed up to enable the early diagnosis of complications.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document