Strategies to Maintain Radial Artery Patency Following Diagnostic Coronary Angiography

Author(s):  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 48-50
Author(s):  
Shankar Laudari ◽  
Sachin Dhungel ◽  
Laxman Dubey ◽  
Guru Prasad ◽  
R Bhattacharya ◽  
...  

The radial artery access has gained popularity as a method of diagnostic coronary catheterization compared to femoral artery puncture in terms of vascular complications and early ambulation. However, very rare complication like radial artery pseudoaneurysm may occur following cardiac catheterization which may give rise to serious consequences. Here, we report a patient with radial pseudoaneurysm following diagnostic coronary angiography. Adequate and correct methodology of compression of radial artery following puncture for maintaining hemostasis is the key to prevention.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/jcmsn.v10i3.12776 Journal of College of Medical Sciences-Nepal, 2014, Vol-10, No-3, 48-50


2022 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-118
Author(s):  
Jun-Won Lee ◽  
Jung-Woo Son ◽  
Tae-Hwa Go ◽  
Dae Ryong Kang ◽  
Sang Jun Lee ◽  
...  

Background/Aims: While distal radial artery (DRA) access is increasingly being used for diagnostic coronary angiography, limited information is available regarding DRA size. We aimed to determine the DRA reference diameters of Korean patients and identify the predictors of DRA diameter < 2.3 mm.Methods: The outer bilateral DRA diameters were assessed using a linear ultrasound probe in 1,162 consecutive patients who underwent transthoracic echocardiography. The DRA diameter was measured by the perpendicular angle in the dorsum of the hand, and the average values were compared by sex. DRA diameter < 2.3 mm was defined as unsuitable for routine diagnostic coronary angiography using a 5 Fr introducer sheath.Results: The mean DRA diameters were 2.31 ± 0.43 mm (right) and 2.35 ± 0.45 mm (left). The DRA was smaller in women than men (right: 2.15 ± 0.38 mm vs. 2.43 ± 0.44 mm, p < 0.001; left: 2.18 ± 0.39 mm vs. 2.47 ± 0.45 mm, p < 0.001). The DRA diameter was approximately 20% smaller than the radial artery diameter. A total of 630 (54.2%) and 574 (49.4%) patients had DRA diameter < 2.3 mm in the right and left hands, respectively. Female sex, low body mass index (BMI), and low body surface area (BSA) were significant predictors of DRA diameter < 2.3 mm.Conclusions: We provided reference DRA diameters for Korean patients. Approximately 50% of the studied patients had DRA diameter < 2.3 mm. Female sex, low BMI, and low BSA remained significant predictors of DRA diameter < 2.3 mm.


Vascular ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 197-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geurys Rojas-Marte ◽  
On Chen ◽  
Shivani Verma ◽  
Atul Rao ◽  
Jacob Shani ◽  
...  

A 63-year-old female was diagnosed with severe aortic stenosis, who underwent a diagnostic coronary angiography via transradial approach prior an aortic-valve replacement. After imaging the left coronary system, entrapment of the diagnostic catheter was encountered as a result of spasm of the radial artery. An arteriogram of the arm revealed an anatomical variation in the radial artery (high take-off). Several attempts to remove the entrapped catheter resulted in avulsion of the artery, which was managed successfully with coil embolization. To our knowledge, no such complication has been reported.


2014 ◽  
Vol 62 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Blumenstein ◽  
C. Liebetrau ◽  
J. Kempfert ◽  
W.-K. Kim ◽  
A. Van Linden ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 72 (13) ◽  
pp. B324
Author(s):  
Karim Al-Azizi ◽  
Kyle Gobeil ◽  
Vikram Grewal ◽  
Khawar Maqsood ◽  
Ali Haider ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 653-658 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Sandborg ◽  
Sven-G�ran Fransson ◽  
H�kan Pettersson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document