scholarly journals Initial clinical presentation of children with acute and chronic versus acute subdural hemorrhage resulting from abusive head trauma

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 177-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth W. Feldman ◽  
Naomi F. Sugar ◽  
Samuel R. Browd

OBJECT At presentation, children who have experienced abusive head trauma (AHT) often have subdural hemorrhage (SDH) that is acute, chronic, or both. Controversy exists whether the acute SDH associated with chronic SDH results from trauma or from spontaneous rebleeding. The authors compared the clinical presentations of children with AHT and acute SDH with those having acute and chronic SDH (acute/chronic SDH). METHODS The study was a multicenter retrospective review of children who had experienced AHT during 2004–2009. The authors compared the clinical and radiological characteristics of children with acute SDH to those of children with acute/chronic SDH. RESULTS The study included 383 children with AHT and either acute SDH (n = 291) or acute/chronic SDH (n = 92). The children with acute/chronic SDH were younger, had higher initial Glasgow Coma Scale scores, fewer deaths, fewer skull fractures, less parenchymal brain injury, and fewer acute noncranial fractures than did children with acute SDH. No between-group differences were found for the proportion with retinal hemorrhages, healing noncranial fractures, or acute abusive bruises. A similar proportion (approximately 80%) of children with acute/chronic SDH and with acute SDH had retinal hemorrhages or acute or healing extracranial injures. Of children with acute/chronic SDH, 20% were neurologically asymptomatic at presentation; almost half of these children were seen for macrocephaly, and for all of them, the acute SDH was completely within the area of the chronic SDH. CONCLUSIONS Overall, the presenting clinical and radiological characteristics of children with acute SDH and acute/chronic SDH caused by AHT did not differ, suggesting that repeated abuse, rather than spontaneous rebleeding, is the etiology of most acute SDH in children with chronic SDH. However, more severe neurological symptoms were more common among children with acute SDH. Children with acute/chronic SDH and asymptomatic macrocephaly have unique risks and distinct radiological and clinical characteristics.

2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 281-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Mun-Ching Wong ◽  
Chih-Hua Yeh ◽  
Ho-Ling Liu ◽  
Tai-Wei Wu ◽  
Kuang-Lin Lin ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Manpreet S. Chhabra ◽  
Dean J. Bonsall ◽  
Amy E. Cassedy ◽  
Gregory H. Wallace ◽  
Scott D. Schoenberger ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Gaurav Bhardwaj ◽  
Mark B. Jacobs ◽  
Frank J. Martin ◽  
Craig Donaldson ◽  
Kieran T. Moran ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 210-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krishnamoorthy Thamburaj ◽  
Ajay Soni ◽  
Lori D. Frasier ◽  
Kyaw N. Tun ◽  
Sarah R. Weber ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 117 ◽  
pp. 105119
Author(s):  
James Anderst ◽  
Shannon Carpenter ◽  
Terra Frazier ◽  
Brian Appavu ◽  
Michael Noetzel ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. p52
Author(s):  
Niels Lynøe ◽  
Anders Eriksson

Various algorithms have been developed for diagnosis of Abusive Head Trauma (AHT); however, there is no explicit algorithm for the 1/3 of alleged AHT cases which present with findings restricted to subdural and retinal hemorrhages, with or without encephalopathy—i.e., isolated triad cases. Moreover, such cases have been lumped together with AHT cases with external sign of trauma and all diagnosed as AHT despite those we are focusing on lack signs of trauma. It is therefore relevant to analyze how this diagnosis can be reached in the absence of unequivocal trauma. Our analysis indicates that with respect to isolated triad cases, a two-step algorithm seems to be in use—but unspoken. The first step concerns a ruling out diagnostic process and the second step addresses the veracity of the caregivers’ narrative. Both steps are based on the traditional AHT mechanism theories and ten tacitly applied auxiliary hypotheses which are, however, questionable or incorrect. If the traditional AHT mechanism theories and necessary auxiliary hypotheses are not valid, then neither is the two-step algorithm. Accordingly, we propose that in alleged AHT cases with no external signs of trauma, the two-step algorithm—here referred to as the unspoken shaken baby lie detector algorithm—should be abandoned.


2013 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 169-173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Majida A. Gaffar ◽  
Debra Esernio-Jenssen ◽  
Sylvia R. Kodsi

2018 ◽  
Vol 48 (13) ◽  
pp. 1915-1923 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meghann M. Ronning ◽  
Patrick L. Carolan ◽  
Gretchen J. Cutler ◽  
Richard J. Patterson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document