Cervical arthroplasty after previous surgery: results of treating 24 discs in 15 patients

2005 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. 335-341 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lali H. S. Sekhon ◽  
William Sears ◽  
Neil Duggal
Keyword(s):  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Cervical Disc ◽  
Cervical Disc Disease ◽  
Disc Disease ◽  
Cervical Arthroplasty ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Anterior Interbody Fusion ◽  
Posterior Foraminotomy ◽  
Fine Print

Object. The potential role of cervical arthroplasty in patients who have undergone previous cervical surgery is unknown. The authors performed a prospective study involving nonrandomized clinical and radiological assessment in patients who had undergone either previous posterior cervical foraminotomy or anterior interbody fusion and who suffered new or persistent arm/neck symptoms related to neural compression. Methods. During a 30-month period, 15 patients who had previously undergone cervical spinal surgery underwent cervical arthroplasty that involved placement of the Bryan disc for neck or arm symptoms related to cervical disc disease. A total of 24 devices were implanted. Six of the 15 patients had undergone a previous posterior foraminotomy, and in nine cases an anterior interbody fusion had been perfomed at some stage prior to surgery. Clinical and radiological evaluations were performed preoperatively and after surgery to assess outcomes. A total of 24 arthroplasties were performed encompassing between one and three levels. There were no major perioperative complications or immediate device-related failures. Two patients were lost to follow up. The follow-up period ranged from 12 to 43 months (mean 24.2 ± 10.5 months). Good results were obtained in all cases as reflected by an increase in the visual analog scale score of 6.4 in terms of neck/arm pain (p < 0.05). There was no difference in Oswestry Disability Index scores for neck pain (p > 0.05) and no patient required surgery at the same level. In one patient hypermobility developed with internal subluxation of the device, which suggested a compromise adjacent to a two-level fusion at 21 months. The segment was hypermobile preoperatively. The patient has experienced recurrent neck pain but otherwise remains clinically well and has not required revision surgery to date. Conclusions. Insertion of the Bryan artificial cervical disc in patients who have previously undergone cervical fusion or posterior foraminotomy, in general, appears to be safe. It provided encouraging early clinical results, although patients with preoperative hypermobility should be treated with caution. Issues such as accelerated device-related wear and the use of arthroplasty after aggressive facetectomy resection will need further study; however, in carefully selected patients who have undergone previous surgery cervical arthroplasty may provide an additional tool in the management of cervical disc disease.

The future in the care of the cervical spine: interbody fusion and arthroplasty

2004 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Praveen V. Mummaneni ◽  
Regis W. Haid
Keyword(s):  
Adjacent Segment Degeneration ◽  
Cervical Disc ◽  
Adjacent Segment ◽  
Cervical Fusion ◽  
Cervical Disc Disease ◽  
Disc Disease ◽  
Cervical Arthroplasty ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Fine Print

✓ In the past 50 years tremendous advances have been made in the treatment of cervical disc disease with cervical fusion. Fusion rates have surpassed 95% after application of anterior cervical implants. Adjacent-segment degeneration, however, has plagued the long-term clinical success of cervical fusion. Cervical arthroplasty has been introduced to maintain cervical motion and potentially avoid or minimize adjacent-segment degeneration. If cervical arthroplasty is successful, the long-term results of surgery for cervical disc disease may improve; however, there are associated drawbacks that must be overcome. Implant wear, fatigue, and failure have been reported in cases of large-joint arthroplasty, and research is underway to limit these problems in cervical arthroplasty. In this article the authors trace the evolution of cervical fusion and the new technique of cervical arthroplasty. The nomenclature of cervical arthroplasty will also be introduced.

Use of a polymethylmethacrylate cervical cage in the treatment of single-level cervical disc disease

2005 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jyi-Feng Chen ◽  
Chieh-Tsai Wu ◽  
Sai-Cheung Lee ◽  
Shih-Tseng Lee
Keyword(s):  
Cancellous Bone ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Cervical Disc Herniation ◽  
Cervical Disc ◽  
Cervical Disc Disease ◽  
Disc Disease ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Single Level ◽  
Fine Print

Object. Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement has been used as a spacer in the treatment of patients with cervical disc disease with good long-term outcomes, but solid bone fusion has not been demonstrated in all cases. To achieve cervical interbody fusion, the authors designed a modified PMMA cervical cage that they filled with spongy bone for the treatment of single-level cervical disc herniation. Methods. Sixty-three patients underwent anterior cervical microdiscectomy and implantation of a PMMA cervical cage filled with autograft cancellous bone and were followed for a minimum of 2 years. The fusion rates were 90.5 and 100% at the 6- and 12-month follow-up examinations, respectively. The mean intervertebral disc height gain was 3.4 ± 1.9 mm when preoperative and 24-month postoperative values were compared. Neck pain, measured using the Huskissan visual analog scale (0 mm, no pain; 100 mm, worst possible pain), decreased from 71 ± 13 mm at preoperative baseline to 28 ± 17 at 6, 23 ± 19 at 12, and 31 ± 19 mm at 24 months. Based on the same scale, radicular pain decreased from 83 ± 15 mm at preoperative baseline to 24 ± 11 at 6, 27 ± 13 at 12, and 22 ± 11 mm at 24 months. The self-rated clinical outcome was excellent in 45 (71.4%) and good in 18 (28.6%) of the 63 patients. Conclusions. The autograft cancellous bone—filled PMMA cage is safe and effective for cervical interbody fusion in the treatment of single-level cervical disc herniation and monoradiculopathy.

Failed anterior cervical foraminotomy

2003 ◽  
Vol 98 (2) ◽  
pp. 126-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Hacker ◽  
Christopher G. Miller
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Disc ◽  
Cervical Disc Disease ◽  
Disc Disease ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Degenerative Cervical Disc Disease ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Cervical Surgery ◽  
Cervical Foraminotomy ◽  
Fine Print

Object. Anterior cervical foraminotomy has been advocated as a procedure that preserves the motion segment while treating radiculopathy due to degenerative cervical disc disease. Because the medical literature contains no long-term follow up or randomized studies related to this procedure, the authors reviewed their results, specifically examining cases of failure to determine the efficacy of the approach. Methods. The authors identified 23 patients in whom unilateral cervical radiculopathy due to degenerative cervical disc disease was refractory to conservative therapy and in whom anterior cervical foraminotomy was performed between 1998 and 2000. The procedure involves ipsilateral exposure, microsurgical removal of the uncovertebral joint to identify the nerve root, and partial removal of the lateral anulus and or disc fragments. Data in those patients who underwent reoperation(s) were reviewed specifically for the procedure type, interval between index procedure and reoperation, and whether multiple procedures were performed. Of the 23 patients, 30% required at least one additional procedure. A good or excellent outcome at last follow-up examination was achieved in only 12 patients. Conclusions. In the current study the authors found a reoperation rate that is considerably higher than that in most series of anterior cervical surgery for radiculopathy. The presumed benefit of anterior cervical foraminotomy is preservation of the disc interspace; however, in this study, a significant number of patients failed to experience a satisfying outcome. Currently the authors do not recommend anterior cervical foraminotomy as a stand-alone procedure.

scholarly journals Adjacent-level arthroplasty following cervical fusion

2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. E5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deshpande V. Rajakumar ◽  
Akshay Hari ◽  
Murali Krishna ◽  
Subhas Konar ◽  
Ankit Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Cobb Angle ◽  
Anterior Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Cervical Disc ◽  
Cervical Fusion ◽  
Adjacent Level ◽  
Cervical Disc Disease ◽  
Disc Disease ◽  
Cervical Arthroplasty ◽  
Arm Pain

OBJECTIVE Adjacent-level disc degeneration following cervical fusion has been well reported. This condition poses a major treatment dilemma when it becomes symptomatic. The potential application of cervical arthroplasty to preserve motion in the affected segment is not well documented, with few studies in the literature. The authors present their initial experience of analyzing clinical and radiological results in such patients who were treated with arthroplasty for new or persistent arm and/or neck symptoms related to neural compression due to adjacent-segment disease after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). METHODS During a 5-year period, 11 patients who had undergone ACDF anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and subsequently developed recurrent neck or arm pain related to adjacent-level cervical disc disease were treated with cervical arthroplasty at the authors' institution. A total of 15 devices were implanted (range of treated levels per patient: 1–3). Clinical evaluation was performed both before and after surgery, using a visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and the Neck Disability Index (NDI). Radiological outcomes were analyzed using pre- and postoperative flexion/extension lateral radiographs measuring Cobb angle (overall C2–7 sagittal alignment), functional spinal unit (FSU) angle, and range of motion (ROM). RESULTS There were no major perioperative complications or device-related failures. Statistically significant results, obtained in all cases, were reflected by an improvement in VAS scores for neck/arm pain and NDI scores for neck pain. Radiologically, statistically significant increases in the overall lordosis (as measured by Cobb angle) and ROM at the treated disc level were observed. Three patients were lost to follow-up within the first year after arthroplasty. In the remaining 8 cases, the duration of follow-up ranged from 1 to 3 years. None of these 8 patients required surgery for the same vertebral level during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS Artificial cervical disc replacement in patients who have previously undergone cervical fusion surgery appears to be safe, with encouraging early clinical results based on this small case series, but more data from larger numbers of patients with long-term follow-up are needed. Arthroplasty may provide an additional tool for the management of post-fusion adjacent-level cervical disc disease in carefully selected patients.

Influence of an artificial cervical joint compared with fusion on adjacent-level motion in the treatment of degenerative cervical disc disease

2002 ◽  
Vol 96 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Crispin Wigfield ◽  
Steven Gill ◽  
Richard Nelson ◽  
Ilana Langdon ◽  
Newton Metcalf ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Autologous Bone Graft ◽  
Intervertebral Discs ◽  
Cervical Disc ◽  
Adjacent Level ◽  
Disc Disease ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Fine Print

Object. The authors report the preservation of motion at surgically treated and adjacent spinal segments after placing an artificial cervical joint (ACJ) and they describe the influence of interbody fusion on changes in angulation occurring in the sagittal plane at adjacent levels in the treatment of cervical spondylosis. Methods. The authors conducted a prospective nonrandomized study of patients in whom an ACJ was placed or autologous bone graft interbody fusion was performed. Angular measurements at levels adjacent to that surgically treated were calculated using plain flexion—extension radiographs obtained at 6-month intervals. Analyses of qualitative data, such as increase or decrease in adjacent-level motion, and the degree of disc degeneration were performed. Quantitative data were also analyzed. In the fusion group a significant increase in adjacent-level movement was demonstrated at the 12-month follow-up visit compared with the group of patients in whom ACJs were placed (p < 0.001). The increase in movement occurred predominantly at intervertebral discs that were preoperatively regarded as normal (p < 0.02). An overall reduction in adjacent-level movement was observed in patients who underwent joint replacement, although this was compensated for by the movement provided by the ACJ itself. Conclusions. Fusion results in increased motion at adjacent levels. The increase in adjacent-level motion derives from those discs that appear radiologically normal prior to surgery. It remains unknown whether ACJs have a protective influence on adjacent intervertebral discs.

A randomized prospective study of an anterior cervical interbody fusion device with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up results

2000 ◽  
Vol 93 (2) ◽  
pp. 222-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Hacker
Keyword(s):  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Anterior Cervical Fusion ◽  
Cervical Disc ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Cervical Fusion ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Solid Fusion ◽  
Fine Print

Object. Despite variations in technique, inherent problems persist with current approaches to anterior cervical fusion. This study was performed to determine whether anterior cervical fusion performed using an investigational device was safe and effective in the treatment of degenerative cervical disc disorders and whether this device offered advantages over current techniques. Methods. Fifty-four patients with radiculopathy with or without mild myelopathy due to one- or two-level cervical degenerative disc disease were randomized as part of a Food and Drug Administration device study. Following microsurgical discectomy, the control group was treated with iliac crest graft fusion; the experimental study group underwent insertion of an interspace cage and placement of a local autograft. All patients received postoperative follow-up care for at least 2 years. Good or excellent results were found in approximately 97% of the experimental group and 88% of the control group. A solid fusion was achieved in all patients who underwent one-level cage placement, and a solid fusion at one or both levels was achieved in over 90% of both groups. Chronic donor site pain was reported by 31% of the control group. Conclusions. In this study, the use of an interbody fusion cage avoided donor site morbidity and placement of autograft achieved a high rate of good or excellent results. Interbody fusion cages appear safe and effective, and their use helps to avoid some of the inherent problems in performing current anterior cervical fusion techniques.

Anterior surgery for cervical disc disease

1980 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Dade Lunsford ◽  
David J. Bissonette ◽  
David S. Zorub
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Cervical Disc ◽  
Cervical Canal ◽  
Cervical Disc Disease ◽  
Disc Disease ◽  
Duration Of Symptoms ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Cervical Surgery ◽  
Anterior Cervical Surgery

✓ The results of anterior cervical surgery for treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) are assessed 1 to 7 years postoperatively in 32 patients. At follow-up review, 50% were improved after surgery and 50% were unimproved or had deteriorated in spite of surgery. The results could not be statistically linked to the patients' age, duration of symptoms, severity of myelopathy, cervical canal size, or the performance of single- or multiple-level operations. Various anterior surgical techniques were used, but none proved to have superior results. The results in this series failed to surpass the results obtained by others for conservative treatment alone. In many cases, symptoms of CSM progressed despite the intervention of anterior cervical surgery.

Cervicothoracic radiculopathy treated using posterior cervical foraminotomy/discectomy

2003 ◽  
Vol 98 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
James S. Harrop ◽  
Marco T. Silva ◽  
Ashwini D. Sharan ◽  
Steven J. Dante ◽  
Frederick A. Simeone
Keyword(s):  
Morbidity Rate ◽  
Symptom Duration ◽  
Specific Information ◽  
Disc Disease ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Included Patient ◽  
Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy ◽  
Disc Herniations ◽  
Fine Print

Object. The authors conducted a study to identify the effectiveness and morbidity rate associated with treating cervicothoracic disc disease (radiculopathy) via a posterior approach. Methods. Nineteen patients underwent posterior cervicothoracic laminoforaminotomy during a 5.6-year period. Medical records, imaging studies, office charts, hospital records, and phone interview data were reviewed. Specific information analyzed included patient demographics, side of lesion, and conservative treatment, symptoms, and pre- and postoperative pain levels. Pain was rated using a visual analog scale and classified into a radicular and neck component. Data in 19 patients (seven women and 12 men) who underwent 20 procedures (one patient underwent separate bilateral foraminotomies) were analyzed. The mean patient age was 54.8 years (range 38–73 years), and the follow-up period ranged from 23 to 62 months. Symptom duration ranged from 1 to 14 months (mean 3.4 months) and consisted of weakness, numbness, and painful radiculopathies in 11, 16, and 20 cases, respectively. Motor weakness was identified in 11 of 19 patients (mean grade of 4.35), and postoperatively strength normalized in eight of 11 (mean grade of 4.79). The improvement in motor scores was significant (p = 0.007). Pain was the most common presenting symptom. Preoperative radiculopathies were rated between 0 and 10 (mean 7.45), and postoperatively scores were reduced to 0 to 3 (mean 0.2) which was significant (p < 0.0001). Preoperative neck pain was rated between 0 and 8 (mean 2.55), and on follow up ranged from 0 to 2 (mean 0.5), which was also significant (p = 0.001). Conclusions. Posterior cervicothoracic foraminotomy was a safe and effective procedure in the treatment of patients with laterally located disc herniations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document