Comparative Analysis of the Biomechanical Characteristics After Different Minimally Invasive Surgeries for Cervical Spondylopathy: A Finite Element Analysis

Minimally invasive surgeries, including posterior endoscopic cervical foraminotomy (PECF), microsurgical anterior cervical foraminotomy (MACF), anterior transdiscal approach of endoscopic cervical discectomy (ATd-ECD), and anterior transcorporeal approach of endoscopic cervical discectomy (ATc-ECD), have obtained positive results for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy. Nonetheless, there is a lack of comparison among them regarding their biomechanical performance. The purpose of this study is to investigate the biomechanical changes of operated and adjacent segments after minimally invasive surgeries compared to a normal cervical spine. A three-dimensional model of normal cervical vertebrae C3–C7 was established using finite element analysis. Afterwards, four surgical models (PECF, MACF, ATd-ECD, and ATc-ECD) were constructed on the basis of the normal model. Identical load conditions were applied to simulate flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation of the cervical spine. We calculated the range of motion (ROM), intradiscal pressure (IDP), annulus fibrosus pressure (AFP), uncovertebral joints contact pressure (CPRESS), and facet joints CPRESS under different motions. For all circumstances, ATc-ECD was close to the normal cervical spine model, whereas ATd-ECD significantly increased ROM and joints CPRESS and decreased IDP in the operated segment. PECF increased more the operated segment ROM than did the MACF, but the MACF obtained maximum IDP and AFP. Except for ATc-ECD, the other models increased joints CPRESS of the operated segment. For adjacent segments, ROM, IDP, and joints CPRESS showed a downward trend in all models. All models showed good biomechanical stability. With their combination biomechanics, safety, and conditions of application, PECF and ATc-ECD could be appropriate choices for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy.

Minimally Invasive Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy Versus Anterior Cervical Fusion and Arthroplasty: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Study Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Objectives Patients with lateral cervical disc and foraminal pathology can be treated with anterior and posterior approaches including anterior cervical discectomy and fusion(ACDF), cervical total disc arthroplasty(TDA), and minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy(MIS-PCF). Although MIS-PCF may have some advantages over the anterior approaches, few comparative studies and meta-analyses have been done to assess superiority. Methods This study includes a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of studies directly comparing minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy to either anterior cervical discectomy and fusion or cervical total disc arthroplasty. Results In comparing patients undergoing ACDF and MIS-PCF, operative time ranged from 68 to 97.8 minutes in the ACDF group compared to 28 to 93.9 minutes in the MIS-PCF group. Mean postoperative length of stay ranged from 33.84 to 112.8 hours in the ACDF group compared to 13.68 to 83.6 hours in the MIS-PCF group. The total complication rates were 3.72% in the ACDF group and 3.73% in the MIS-PCF group. A random-effects model meta-analysis was carried out which failed to show a statistically significant difference in the complication rate between the two procedures(OR .91; 95% CI 0.13, 6.43; P = .92, I2 = 59%). The total reoperation rate was 3.5% in the ACDF group and 5.4% in the MIS-PCF group. A random-effects model meta-analysis was carried out which failed to show a statistically significant difference in the reoperation rate between the two procedures(OR .66; 95% CI 0.33, 1.33; P = .25, I2 = 0). In comparing patients undergoing TDA and MIS-PCF, operative time ranged from 90.3 to 106.7 minutes in the TDA group compared to 77.4 to 93.9 minutes in the MIS-PCF group. Mean postoperative length of stay ranged from 103.2 to 165.6 hours in the TDA group and 93.6 to 98.4 hours in the MIS-PCF group. The complication rate ranged from 23.5 to 28.6% in the TDA group and 0 to 14.3% in the MIS-PCF group. The overall reoperation rates were 2.6% in the TDA group and 10.2% in the MIS-PCF group. Conclusions There is no clear superiority between MIS-PCF and ACDF/TDA in terms of operative time, postoperative length of stay, or rate of complications/reoperations. Further studies with increased follow-up intervals >48 months, and higher sample sizes are necessary to determine the true superiority of MIS-PCF and anterior neck approaches in treatment of lateral disc and foraminal pathology.

Clinical Outcomes of Posterior Percutaneous Endoscopic Cervical Foraminotomy and Discectomy Assisted with SNRB in Treating Cervical Radiculopathy with Diagnostic Uncertainty

BACKGROUND: Selective nerve root block (SNRB) has been used to facilitate the diagnostic process when radiologic abnormalities are not correlated with clinical symptomatology in patients with cervical radiculopathy. Meanwhile, minimally invasive posterior percutaneous endoscopic cervical foraminotomy and discectomy (PPECFD) has been widely used to treat cervical radiculopathy because of its advantages. However, combination of these 2 procedures in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy with diagnostic uncertainty has not been reported. OBJECTIVES: To examine the clinical outcomes of PPECFD assisted with SNRB in patients who had cervical radiculopathy with diagnostic uncertainty. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective design was used. SETTING: This study was conducted in a university-affiliated tertiary hospital in Shanghai, China. METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients with cervical radicular pain who had diagnostic uncertainty were included (January 2018 to January 2019). Diagnostic SNRB was performed to identify the responsible nerve root(s). PPECFD was selected as the treatment when the SNRB result was positive. Clinical outcomes were assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and modified Macnab criteria. Pre- and post-operative radiologic and clinical parameters were evaluated. Other information was retrieved from the electronic records. RESULTS: All patients had successful SNRB procedures. Four were excluded from the analysis because of the negative results of the SNRB. Among the remaining 26 patients who underwent the subsequent PPECFD surgery, the mean follow-up was 14 months. Compared with preoperative values, the mean VAS scores for radicular arm pain and neck pain, as well as the NDI score, improved significantly. According to the Macnab criteria, 22 patients (84.6%) had excellent or good results. No major peri- and postoperative complications were observed. LIMITATIONS: This study used a retrospective design with relatively small sample size and medium follow-up duration. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic SNRB may be a helpful tool to identify the origin of cervical radicular pain for patients with diagnostic uncertainty. With the guidance of SNRB, PPECFD is likely to be an effective and safe option for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy with diagnostic uncertainty. KEY WORDS: Cervical radiculopathy, selective nerve root block, percutaneous endoscopic cervical foraminotomy and discectomy, diagnostic, uncertainty