scholarly journals Habent sua fata libelli. Losy dzieła "De cardinalibus operibus Christi"

Vox Patrum ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 79 ◽  
pp. 83-98
Author(s):  
Agnieszka Dziuba
Keyword(s):  
John Owen

Artykuł stanowi próbę rekonstrukcji losów dzieła De cardinalibus operibus Christi, popularnego w szesnastowiecznej dyskusji polemicznej z reformacją. Początkowo, przez kilka dziesięcioleci uznawano je za dzieło św. Cypriana, biskupa Kartaginy, i pod imieniem tego autora funkcjonowało w polskich dialogach Marcina Kromera. Także wybitni humaniści tego stulecia, jak Paweł Manucjusz, zaliczyli De cardinalibus operibus do prac biskupa z Kartaginy. Dopiero Jakub Pameliusz  i Robert Bellarmin poddali w wątpliwość jego autorstwo. Nazwisko autentycznego twórcy 12 mów o najważniejszych wydarzeniach z dziejów Chrystusa ustalili niezależnie od siebie Philippus Labbe i John Owen, którzy dotarli do manuskryptu  z biblioteki All Souls College w Oksfordzie, zawierającego w adresie zarówno właściwego adresata dzieła, jak i jego autora. Koleje recepcji De cardinalibus operibus Christi pokazują ciekawe losy książek, odsłaniają warsztat dawnego badacza, a także mogą zainspirować do dalszych studiów w tym zakresie, gdyż wiele jeszcze dawnych tekstów nie ma ustalonych autorów, jak chociażby te z pism, dawniej przypisywanych św. Cyprianowi, a dzisiaj uznanych za nieautentyczne.

John Owen on Thomas More

Moreana ◽  
1965 ◽  
Vol 2 (Number 7) (3) ◽  
pp. 104-105
Author(s):  
Frank Sullivan
Keyword(s):  
Thomas More ◽  
John Owen

Thomas More and the Epigrams of John Owen : A Reference and an Analog

Moreana ◽  
1980 ◽  
Vol 17 (Number 67-6 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 39-41
Author(s):  
Charles Clay Doyle
Keyword(s):  
Thomas More ◽  
John Owen

“What Freedom?”

2019 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
pp. 305-331
Author(s):  
John Owen Havard
Keyword(s):  
South America ◽  
French Revolution ◽  
The Political ◽  
The Novel ◽  
Free Condition ◽  
Narrative Design ◽  
Economic Liberalism ◽  
History Of ◽  
Ways Of Thinking ◽  
John Owen

John Owen Havard, “‘What Freedom?’: Frankenstein, Anti-Occidentalism, and English Liberty” (pp. 305–331) “If he were vanquished,” Victor Frankenstein states of his monstrous creation in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein (1818), “I should be a free man.” But he goes on: “Alas! what freedom? such as the peasant enjoys when his family have been massacred before his eyes, his cottage burnt, his lands laid waste, and he is turned adrift, homeless, pennyless, and alone, but free.” Victor’s circumstances approximate the deracinated subject of an emergent economic liberalism, while looking to other destitute and shipwrecked heroes. Yet the ironic “freedom” described here carries an added charge, which Victor underscores when he concludes this account of his ravaged condition: “Such would be my liberty.” This essay revisits the geographic plotting of Frankenstein: the digression to the East in the nested “harem” episode, the voyage to England, the neglected episode of Victor’s imprisonment in Ireland, and the creature’s desire to live in South America. Locating Victor’s concluding appeal to his “free” condition within the novel’s expansive geography amplifies the political stakes of his downfall, calling attention to not only his own suffering but the wider trail of destruction left in his wake. Where existing critical accounts have emphasized the French Revolution and its violent aftermath, this obscures the novel’s pointed critique of a deep and tangled history of English liberty and its destructive legacies. Reexamining the novel’s geography in tandem with its use of form similarly allows us to rethink the overarching narrative design of Frankenstein, in ways that disrupt, if not more radically dislocate, existing rigid ways of thinking about the novel.

Lingering Reluctance among Reformed Englishmen

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jay T. Collier
Keyword(s):  
Church History ◽  
Early Church ◽  
John Owen ◽  
The Way

Chapter 6 looks at the perseverance debate started by the avowed Arminian John Goodwin, who appealed to Augustine and the early church for a denial of the perseverance of the saints. The chapter focuses on the Reformed responses among Goodwin’s Puritan counterparts, like John Owen and George Kendall, and how they challenged Goodwin’s reading of Augustine and defended the importance of perseverance for confessing the Reformed faith. It also focuses on Richard Baxter’s alternate perspective, which affirmed the doctrine of the perseverance of the saints but questioned whether it should be a confessional issue based on his reading of Augustine and the witness of church history. This chapter reveals how competing readings of Augustine on perseverance persisted among Reformed Englishmen and also how these readings influenced the way Puritans developed and used confessions so as to handle concerns of catholicity.

The Nonconformist Inheritance

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabel Rivers
Keyword(s):  
Eighteenth Century ◽  
Seventeenth Century ◽  
Church Of England ◽  
John Bunyan ◽  
John Wesley ◽  
Religious Attitudes ◽  
Pilgrim's Progress ◽  
The Many ◽  
John Owen

This chapter analyses the editions, abridgements, and recommendations of texts by seventeenth-century nonconformists that were made by eighteenth-century dissenters, Methodists, and Church of England evangelicals. The nonconformist writers they chose include Joseph Alleine, Richard Baxter, John Flavel, John Owen, and John Bunyan. The editors and recommenders include Philip Doddridge, John Wesley, Edward Williams, Benjamin Fawcett, George Burder, John Newton, William Mason, and Thomas Scott. Detailed accounts are provided of the large number of Baxter’s works that were edited, notably A Call to the Unconverted and The Saints Everlasting Rest, and a case study is devoted to the many annotated editions of Bunyan’s Pilgrim’s Progress and the ways in which they were used. The editors took into account length, intelligibility, religious attitudes, and cost, and sometimes criticized their rivals’ versions on theological grounds.

John Owen

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan M. McGraw
Keyword(s):  
John Owen
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document