scholarly journals A Study on the Possibility that Acts Pentecostal Tongues and Modern Tongues Were the Same Tongues: Focused on Acts 2 and 1 Corinthians 12

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (null) ◽  
pp. 200-231
Author(s):  
Kim ByongDai
Keyword(s):  
2019 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 88-95
Author(s):  
Fergus J. King ◽  
Selwyn Selvendran

This article puts forward the proposition that the twin phenomena of ecstatic language identified in Acts 2 and 1 Corinthians 14 should not be conflated into a single behavior: speaking in tongues. It is argued the two NT accounts describe two distinct practices: xenolalia (Acts 2) and glossolalia (1 Corinthians 14). Furthermore, when their differences are recognized, this distinction is supported by evidence from neuroscience that different cognitive and neural functions are involved in the two phenomena as depicted: neurophysiological research confirms the difference between the Pentecost experience described in Acts, and the spiritual gifts of the Pauline texts.


2017 ◽  
Vol 114 (2) ◽  
pp. 308-310
Author(s):  
Tracy Hartman

This sermon begins by asking readers to imagine the chaotic life-change that Pentecost brought for the original eye witnesses. It then traces the breath or spirit of God from Genesis, through Ezekiel and into the gospels, where the Spirit is manifested to a variety of early believers. Finally, modern hearers are asked to consider what a fresh manifestation of the Spirit might look like in their churches, and how God might use their gifts to be about a new work in the world today.


2017 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marius Nel

Pentecostals see a continuity between the speaking in languages as a part of the filling or baptism with the Spirit in Acts 2 and the other four incidents in Acts (8, 9, 10, 19). This is also the case of the phenomenon described in 1 Corinthians 12–14, and their own experience, in contradistinction to most Protestants who regard the gift of tongues in terms of Acts 2’s description. It is described as the miraculous ability to speak in real foreign languages with the purpose to reach people from different nationalities with the gospel of Jesus Christ. In this article the pentecostal claim of continuity between the speaking in languages in Acts and Corinthians and our own day is being analysed and criticised. The position poses several questions that need to be addressed, like the seeming and presumed discontinuity between languages in Acts 2 and 1 Corinthians, with the modern pentecostal phenomenon of speaking in languages related to what happened in 1 Corinthians and not in Acts. The implication is that a difference exists between the languages used by the Galileans on the Day of Pentecost and the phenomenon of languages occurring in the Corinthian assembly – with the Corinthian assembly associated with the modern charismatic movement. This poses the question whether a differentiation between speaking in languages in Acts and the phenomenon designated with the same term in 1 Corinthians is sustainable; also whether the identification of modern Pentecostals with the Corinthian phenomenon is allowed.


2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barry JOSLIN
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document