scholarly journals Selección de un método para la evaluación del impacto social usando AHP

2018 ◽  
pp. 84-91
Keyword(s):  
Analytic Hierarchy Process ◽  
Impact Assessment ◽  
Social Impact ◽  
Alternative Methods ◽  
Social Impact Assessment ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Environmental Conflicts ◽  
Grey Clustering ◽  
Alternative Methodology ◽  
Hierarchy Process

Selección de un método para la evaluación del impacto social usando AHP Selection of a method for social impact assessment using AHP Alexi Delgado1, 2, I. Romero1 1 Instituto Universitario de Investigación de Ingeniería del Agua y Medio Ambiente (IIAMA), Universitat Politècnica de València, España. 2 Universidad de Ciencias y Humanidades, Perú. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33017/RevECIPeru2015.0013/ Resumen El incremento de conflictos socio-ambientales durante la planificación o la ejecución de proyectos hacen que la evaluación del impacto social sea cada vez más necesaria y objetiva con el fin de prevenir posibles conflictos sociales. En este artículo realizamos un estudio para seleccionar la mejor alternativa metodológica disponible y aplicable a la evaluación del impacto social – social impact assessment (SIA) en proyectos y programas. La selección fue realizada aplicando la metodología del proceso analítico jerárquico - analytic hierarchy process (AHP). En este estudio se propusieron cuatro métodos alternativos para la evaluación del impacto social: Delphi, AHP, FAHP y agrupación Grey, los cuales fueron jerarquizados de acuerdo a los criterios de: Cuantificación, robustez y estandarización. Para realizar la selección usando AHP  se contó con la participación de un panel de cuatro expertos seleccionados para este estudio. Los resultados mostraron que el mejor método para la evaluación del impacto social es la Evaluación grey complementado con el método Delphi y otros procedimientos cualitativos durante la fase de estudio de campo y recolección de información. Descriptores: Evaluación del impacto social, Proceso analítico jerárquico (AHP) Abstract Increase of socio-environmental conflicts during the planning or execution of projects makes social impact assessment is increasingly necessary and objective in order to prevent potential social conflicts. In this paper, we present a study to select the best alternative methodology available and applicable to social impact assessment (SIA) on projects and programs. The selection was conducted using the methodology of analytic hierarchy process (AHP). In this study four alternative methods for social impact assessment were proposed: Delphi, AHP, FAHP and Grey clustering, which were ranked according to criteria: Quantification, robustness and standardization. To make the selection using AHP, we provided of a panel of four experts selected for this study. The results showed that the best method for social impact assessment is the Grey clustering complemented with Delphi method and other qualitative procedures during field study and data collection. Keywords: Social Impact Assessment (SIA), Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP).

scholarly journals Application of Grey Clustering Method Based on Improved Analytic Hierarchy Process in Water Quality Evaluation

2018 ◽  
Vol 246 ◽  
pp. 02004
Author(s):  
Jia Wang ◽  
Xu Wang ◽  
Xinhua Zhang ◽  
Haichen Li ◽  
Xiaohui Lei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Water Quality ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy Process ◽  
Water Environment ◽  
Clustering Coefficient ◽  
Clustering Method ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Environment Management ◽  
Grey Clustering ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
Improved Analytic Hierarchy Process

To highlight the differences in water quality impacts of different indicators in water samples, this paper proposes a grey clustering method based on improved analytic hierarchy process to evaluate the quality of surface water. According to the pollution degree of different indicators in the water quality sample, the importance score is assigned, and the weight of different indicators is calculated by the analytic hierarchy process. The weight participates in the calculation of the grey clustering coefficient, and the evaluated water quality category considers the difference of the contribution rate of different pollutant indicators. The water quality samples of three water periods (Abundant, Normal, and Poor water flow periods) in the four sections of Qingshui River in Duyun City (Tea garden, Youhang, Yingpan and Jiadeng) were selected for evaluation, and the conventional grey clustering method and single factor method were used. The evaluation results were compared and analyzed. The evaluation results show that the improved grey clustering method is more scientific and reasonable and can provide a basis for water quality assessment and water environment management of water environment management departments.

Service Supplier Selection using Analytic Hierarchy Process

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Surajit Bag
Keyword(s):  
Analytic Hierarchy Process ◽  
Supplier Selection ◽  
Selection Criteria ◽  
Selection Process ◽  
Alternative Methods ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Research Directions ◽  
Hierarchy Process

This paper argues the use of Analytic Hierarchy Process in service supplier selection process. The literature has evidence of important criteria for supply supplier selection process. However, there is a dearth of studies on service supplier selection process. To address this gap, this paper firstly systematically reviews the existing procurement literature, secondly, it argues for the use of alternative methods research to address questions related to ranking of selection criteria, and thirdly, it proposes and illustrates the use of Analytic Hierarchy Process to analyze the identified criteria. The paper concludes with limitations and further research directions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document