scholarly journals Arboreal foraging and ambush by grass snakes Natrix natrix on European treefrogs Hyla arborea

2020 ◽  
pp. 39-40
Author(s):  
Mikolaj Kaczmarski
Keyword(s):  
2009 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 379-388 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Reading ◽  
Gabriela Jofré

AbstractThe range sizes and habitat preferences of nine adult European grass snakes (Natrix natrix) were determined from radio-tracking data obtained within a landscape of mixed deciduous woodland and pastoral fields in southern England. These data were analysed using RANGES7v0.81 software. Concave polygons resulted in overall individual range size estimates that varied between 0.18-9.41 ha. However, for individuals that were radio-tracked for more than one season, annual range size estimates ranged between 1.29 ha and 3.56 ha and some snakes shifted their range between seasons. Grass snakes showed a strong preference for habitat boundaries and interfaces and an avoidance of woodland, and fields that were used for grazing. The attributes common to habitats that snakes preferred were a combination of basking site availability and a close proximity to relatively dense vegetation that offered potential protection from predators. The attributes common to habitats that snakes avoided were a lack of basking sites in woodland, and cover, in fields. Grass snakes selected banks as hibernation sites, the majority of which were within woodland.


1962 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 233-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. G. PHILLIPS ◽  
I. CHESTER JONES ◽  
D. BELLAMY

SUMMARY Adrenal glands of lizards (Lacerta viridis L.) and snakes (Natrix natrix L.) were incubated in media containing tritiated progesterone. Aldosterone, corticosterone and an unknown steroid were produced. Added ACTH did not affect, though added amphenone markedly reduced, the rate of steroid production.


Behaviour ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 148 (3) ◽  
pp. 403-404
Author(s):  
Doris Gomez ◽  
Sandrine Plenet ◽  
Thierry Lengagne ◽  
Maxime Derex ◽  
Jean-Paul Léna ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire Daguin Thiebaut ◽  
Stephanie Ruault ◽  
Charlotte Roby ◽  
Thomas Broquet ◽  
Frédérique Viard ◽  
...  

This protocol describes a double digested restriction-site associated DNA (ddRADseq) procedure, that is a variation on the original RAD sequencing method (Davey & Blaxter 2011), which is used for de novo SNP discovery and genotyping. This protocol differs from the original ddRADseq protocol (Peterson et al 2012), in which the samples are pooled just after the ligation to adaptors (i.e. before size selection and PCR). The present ddRAD protocol as been slightly adapted from Alan Brelsford's protocol published in the supplementary material of this paper: Brelsford, A., Dufresnes, C. & Perrin, N. 2016. High-density sex-specific linkage maps of a European tree frog (Hyla arborea) identify the sex chromosome without information on offspring sex. Heredity 116, 177–181 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.2015.83 In the present protocol, all samples are treated separately, in a microplate, until final PCR amplification performed before pooling. Despite being slightly more costly and time-consuming in the lab, it allows for fine adjustement of each sample representation in the final library pool, ensuring similar number of sequencing reads per sample in the final dataset. Briefly, genomic DNA from the samples are individually digested with 2 restriction enzymes (one rare-cutter and one more frequent cutter) then ligated to a barcoded adaptor (among 24 available) at one side, and a single adaptor at the other side, purified with magnetic beads, and PCR-amplified allowing the addition of a Illumina index (among 12 available) for multiplexing a maximum of 288 sample per library. Samples are then pooled in equimolar conditions after visualisation on an agarose gel. Purification and size selection is then performed before final quality control of the library and sequencing.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document