Outcome of tension free open mesh repair of inguinal hernia

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-24
Author(s):  
Mohammad Masum ◽  
Md Aminul Islam ◽  
Masflque Ahmed Bhuiyan ◽  
Kazi Mazharul Lslam ◽  
Md Selim Morshed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Inguinal Hernia Repair ◽  
Mesh Repair ◽  
Groin Hernia ◽  
Synthetic Mesh ◽  
Indirect Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Prolene Mesh ◽  
Tension Free ◽  
Open Mesh Repair

Background: In the practice of General Surgery, hernia repair is the second most common procedure after appendectomy. Several methods have been developed over the years to try to improve hernia repair. Good result can be expected using Bassini's, McVay's, Shouldice's techniques provided the exact nature of hernia is recognized and the repair is done without tension using healthy tissue. The introduction of synthetic mesh started a new era in hernia surgery. The use of synthetic mesh repair of primary and recurrent hernias has gradually gained acceptance among surgeons. Objective: To find out the outcome and complications of open inguinal hernia repair with prolene mesh. Methods: This is a prospective cross sectional study conducted at Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka, from December, 2011 to May, 2012. One hundred patients of inguinal hernia admitted in different surgical units of BSMMU, Dhaka for elective surgery were studied. We have given 1 gm ijv Cephradine per operatively and then 500 gm cephradine ijv 6 hourly for 24 hours followed by oral form of Cephradine for next 5 days. Polypropylene mesh of 11 cm x 7 cm size was used in all cases. All the operations were done by open tension free prolene mesh repair technique. Patients were followed for one year to see the outcome. Results: Out of 100 cases of inguinal hernia, 71 patients (71%) had indirect inguinal hernia and 29 cases (29%) had direct inguinal hernia; 90 cases (90%) were primary hernia and only 10 cases (10%) were recurrent hernia; 58 cases were right sided, 34 cases (34%) were left sided and 8 cases (8%) were bilateral. Complications of mesh repair of groin hernia in this study included wound infection (5%), scrotal oedema (2%), mesh infection (0%), scrotal hematoma (2%), echymoces of peri-incisional skin (5%), early wound and groin pain (7%), chronic inguinodynia (2%), hernia recurrence (1%). Conclusion: In the present study an attempt is made to evaluate the outcome of patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair by prolene mesh. The results confirm that Lichtenstein tension free mesh repair of inguinal hernia is safe and reliable for both primary and recurrent groin hernia, with less recurrence rate. Patient's compliance was good with minimum morbidity. Journal of Surgical Sciences (2018) Vol. 22 (1): 21-24

scholarly journals Clinical Comparation of Postoperative Complications after Lichtenstein versus Bassini Inguinal Hernia Repair.

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 695-698
Author(s):  
Nuhi ARSLANI
Keyword(s):  
Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Inguinal Hernia Repair ◽  
General Surgery ◽  
Mesh Repair ◽  
Indirect Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Tension Free ◽  
Male Patients

Background: In this study we investigated the differences between tension free versus not tension free inguinal hernia repair in occurrence of various postoperative complications. Methods: The study included 65 male patients with direct or indirect inguinal hernia operated at the Department of Abdominal and General Surgery,  between March 2012 and March 2014. The patients were divided into two groups. Evaluated were postoperative complications.. Results: No statistically significant differences in incidences of postoperative complications between two groups (p<0.05). Conclusion: Obtained results show that tension-free mesh repair is equivalent to the not tension free hernia repair method with regards of postoperative complications, severity of postoperative pain and ambulance.

scholarly journals P080 ROUTINE ELECTIVE ILIOHYPOGASTRIC NEURECTOMY IN LICHTENSTEIN INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kryspin Mitura
Keyword(s):  
Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Inguinal Hernia Repair ◽  
Groin Hernia ◽  
Mesh Fixation ◽  
Synthetic Mesh ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Effective Technique ◽  
Open Inguinal Hernia Repair

Abstract Aim Chronic postherniorraphy pain occurs in 8-25% of patients undergoing groin hernioplasty with mesh insertion. The most common cause for inguinodynia is neuropathy resulting from nerve damage or entrapment during mesh fixation. With wide mesh insertion there is often a conflict between upper prosthesis margin and an iliohypogastric nerve. The aim of this study is to present a routine elective iliohypogastric neurectomy in Lichtenstein groin hernia repair for prevention of chronic inguinodynia. Material and Methods Between 2018 and 2020, 398 patients were admitted for open inguinal hernia repair. 218 patients underwent a Lichtenstein repair with transection of iliohypogastric nerve before implantation of 10x14 polypropylene mesh (IH group). In the control group of 180 patients all nerves were spared (C group). Follow-up was conducted on 1 POD,1 month, and 1 year after surgery. Results 1 month after a surgery a pain was reported in 24 (11%) patients in IH group (2.9% severe; 8.1% moderate; 89% no pain), and 48 (26.7%) patients in C group (3.9% severe; 22.8% moderate; 73.3% no pain). 1 year after a surgery a persistent pain was reported in 1 (0.4%) patient in IH group, and in 5 (2.8%) patients in C group. An incidence of inguinodynia was significantly lower after iliohypogastric neurectomy (0.5% vs. 2.8%; p &lt; 0.001). Conclusions Routine neurectomy of iliohypogastric nerve appears to be an effective technique in chronic inguinodynia after open mech repair for inguinal hernias. Iliohypogastric nerve resection allows to place a flat synthetic mesh with wide coverage of myopectineal orifice with no need for additional mesh trimming.

scholarly journals Audit of Patient Outcomes after Lichtenstein Hernioplasty for the Repair of Adult Inguinal Hernia

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 54-58
Author(s):  
Md Ibrahim Siddique ◽  
Samia Mubin ◽  
Krisna Rani Majumder ◽  
Muhammad Ali Siddiquee
Keyword(s):  
Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Inguinal Hernia Repair ◽  
Mesh Repair ◽  
Groin Pain ◽  
General Surgeon ◽  
Chronic Groin Pain ◽  
Tension Free ◽  
Lichtenstein Hernioplasty

Background: Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most commonly performed surgeries worldwide. While numerous surgical approaches exist to treat inguinal hernias, the Lichtenstein tension-free mesh repair remains the gold standard. This retrospective study is carried out to evaluate the short and long term outcomes of Lichtenstein hernioplasty in the hand of a general surgeon. Patients and Methods: A retrospective analysis of all adult inguinal hernia repair by Lichtenstein method between January .2003 and December 2009 was carried out. The outcome measures were early post-operative complications, incidence of chronic groin pain and recurrence rate. Results: A total of 526 procedures were carried out in 445 adult male patients during the study period. The median age of the patients was 49 years (range, 21-73 years). All patients underwent Lichtenstein hernioplasty under spinal anesthesia. Length of hospital stay was median 2.4 days (range, 1-4 days). Median time to the resumption of normal activities was 8 days (range, 5-1 0 days). Urinary retention was the most frequent early post-operative complication (5.1 6%). Rate of wound infection was acceptable (0.44%). Chronic groin pain was experienced by three patients (0.67%). There was no recurrence observed among the 291 (65.4% of the total) patients who were available after two years of the procedure. Conclusion: The Lichtenstein open tension-free mesh repair of adult inguinal hernia is a safe procedure with least post-operative morbidity and least chance for recurrence. It is a simple technique, quick and. easy to perform without compromising the patient's care and long-term outcome in the hand of an experienced general surgeon. Journal of Surgical Sciences (2012) Vol. 16 (2) : 54-58

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document