scholarly journals Anterior Approach Following Intraoperative Reduction for Cervical Facet Fracture and Dislocation

2020 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 202-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seul Gi Kim ◽  
Seon Joo Park ◽  
Hui Sun Wang ◽  
Chang Il Ju ◽  
Sung Myung Lee ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 104-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aditya Vedantam ◽  
Jared Steven Fridley ◽  
Jovany Cruz Navarro ◽  
Shankar P Gopinath

Abstract BACKGROUND Few studies have focused on the management of patients with nondisplaced cervical facet fractures. OBJECTIVE To determine the rate of successful nonoperative management and risk factors for instability in patients with acute traumatic, unilateral, nondisplaced cervical facet fractures. METHODS We reviewed patients with single or multilevel unilateral nondisplaced or minimally displaced subaxial cervical facet fractures between 2008 and 2014. Facet fractures were classified as type A1 fractures: superior facet fracture of caudal vertebra; type A2: inferior facet fracture of rostral vertebral; and type A3: floating lateral mass (fracture of pedicle and vertical laminar fracture). All patients were given a trial of nonoperative management with external immobilization using a hard cervical collar. Follow-up clinical data and cervical spine radiographs were analyzed to determine factors associated with instability. RESULTS Thirty-five patients (34 males, mean age 40.2 ± 2.4 yr) were reviewed. The mean follow-up duration was 2.7 ± 0.4 mo. The distribution of fracture types was type A1 (n = 15), type A2 (n = 4), type A3 (n = 5), type A1 and A2 fractures (n = 10), and type A1 and A3 fractures (n = 1). Nonoperative management was successful in 29 patients (82.9%), and 6 patients developed instability requiring surgery. All patients who failed nonoperative management had associated injuries suggesting a more severe mechanism of injury. No significant association was found between the type of facet fracture and outcome (Fisher's exact test, P = .18). CONCLUSION In our series, more than 80% of the patients with unilateral, nondisplaced cervical facet fractures underwent successful nonoperative management in the short term.


2006 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 39S-40S
Author(s):  
Marcel Dvorak ◽  
Bizhan Aarabi ◽  
Raja Rampersaud ◽  
Mitchel Harris ◽  
Michael Fehlings ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Brian E. Kaufman ◽  
John A. Heydemann ◽  
Suken A. Shah

2020 ◽  
pp. 219256822090757
Author(s):  
Wendy Lee ◽  
Chung Chek Wong

Study Design: Systematic review. Objective: Anterior-alone surgery has gained wider reception for subaxial cervical spine facets dislocation. Questions remain on its efficacy and safety as a stand-alone entity within the contexts of concurrent facet fractures, unilateral versus bilateral dislocations, anterior open reduction, and old dislocation. Methods: A systematic review was performed with search strategy using translatable MESH terms across MEDLINE, EMBASE, VHL Regional Portal, and CENTRAL databases on patients with subaxial cervical dislocation intervened via anterior-alone approach. Two reviewers independently screened for eligible studies. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis) flow chart was adhered to. Nine retrospective studies were included. Narrative synthesis was performed to determine primary outcomes on spinal fusion and revisions and secondary outcomes on new occurrence or deterioration of neurology and infection rate. Results: Nonunion was not encountered across all contexts. A total of 0.86% of unilateral facet dislocation (1 out of 116) with inadequate reduction due to facet fragments between the facet joints removed its malpositioned plate following fusion. No new neurological deficit was observed. Cases that underwent anterior open reduction did not encounter failure that require subsequent posterior reduction surgery. One study (N = 52) on old dislocation incorporated partial corpectomy in their approach and limited anterior-alone approach to cases with persistent instability. Conclusions: This systematic review supports the efficacy and success of anterior reduction, fusion, and instrumentation for cervical facet fracture dislocation. It is safe from a neurological standpoint. Revision rate due to concurrent facet fracture is low. Certain patients may require posteriorly based surgery or in specific cases combined anterior and posterior procedures.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document