Purpose: To compare the surgical outcomes of adjunctive mitomycin-C (MMC) Ahmed valve implantation with and without collagen matrix insertion.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 108 eyes of 108 patients who underwent Ahmed valve implant surgery with adjunctive MMC. Collagen matrix insertion/Ahmed valve implant surgery (CM-AGV) was performed on 55 eyes, while conventional Ahmed valve implant surgery (AGV) was performed on 53 eyes. We defined surgical failure as an intraocular pressure (IOP) > 18 mmHg or <5 mmHg on two or more consecutive visits, regardless of medication status.Results: After surgery, the IOP and number of topical medications required fell significantly (compared with the preoperative period) in both groups (both p < 0.001); these findings did not significantly differ between groups. The cumulative surgical success rates at 1 year did not significantly differ between groups (78.2% vs. 79.2%, p = 0.54). The only risk factor significantly associated with surgical failure was a postoperative hypertensive phase. Anterior chamber (compared with sulcus) tube placement was significantly associated with visual acuity loss at 1 year postoperatively, but this did not significantly differ between groups.Conclusions: At the 1-year follow-up after Ahmed implant surgery with adjunctive MMC, the success rates of surgery with and without collagen matrix insertion were similar.
Utility of Collagen Matrix Insertion during Ahmed Valve Implantation with Adjunctive Mitomycin-C: Outcomes at One-year
