David Curtis, A History of Artists' Film and Video in Britain (London: BFI Publishing, 2007), pp. 294. illus., ISBN 978 1 84457 096 6 (pb), £20.

2009 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 494-498
Author(s):  
Joy Payne
Keyword(s):  
1970 ◽  
pp. 2-3
Author(s):  
Akram Zaatari

The recent history of independent film and video testifies to the significant contributions of women in the field and highlights their role in defining an identity for film and video outside the dominant industry, predominantly a male territory. Far from associating production qualities with the differentgenders, which may lead to superficial - often misleading - conclusions such as describing women's work as sensitive, political, feminine, the question is better posited when it designates the artist's relation to power.


Media in Mind ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 19-48
Author(s):  
Daniel Reynolds

This chapter proposes a theoretical approach to media use that treats media and their users’ minds as continuous with one another. It calls this approach “transactionism.” It shows how the philosophy of John Dewey is relevant to the study of contemporary media. The chapter shows how Dewey’s ideas can clarify historical problems from throughout the history of media studies. It uses examples from video games and films to illustrate the utility of transactionism in thinking about individual media and in thinking about relationships among media. It shows how contemporary philosophy of mind extends concepts from Dewey’s philosophy. This clarifies the relationship between Dewey’s ideas and the film and video game examples that the chapter presents.


Anthropology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie Takaragawa

The Society for Visual Anthropology (SVA) was founded as a section of the American Anthropological Association (AAA) in 1984 to encourage the development and use of visual media in anthropological research and teaching. The adoption of photographic technology, along with film and video, into anthropological practice informed the development of a visual anthropology early on, but visual media were not formally incorporated into anthropological and ethnographic research until the 1970s, through predecessors of SVA to be discussed in depth in this article. SVA was developed largely by North American anthropologists who identified the growing importance of visual media to anthropological studies, and argued for greater critical awareness in the implementation of their use. SVA continues to be an active subsection of the AAA, as well as producing the journal Visual Anthropology Review (VAR). In the journal American Anthropologist (AA), SVA contributed heavily to the ethnographic film section beginning in the 1960s and continues to contribute through the newly renamed Multimodal Anthropology section. In addition to serving as a forum for members interested in visual anthropology, SVA has advocated the use of visual media for satisfying promotion and tenure requirements. In 2001, AAA formally approved guidelines created by SVA for the professional evaluation of ethnographic visual media, to assist in the tenure and promotion processes for anthropologists working with and producing visual materials. Historical documents of the SVA have been archived at the Smithsonian National Anthropological Archives in Suitland, Maryland by SVA Historian Joanna Cohan Scherer. SVA developed from the Society for the Anthropology of Visual Communication (SAVICOM).


2009 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 16-20
Author(s):  
David Curtis ◽  
Steven Ball

The British Artists’ Film and Video Study Collection is a small specialist collection dedicated to the history of artists’ moving images in Britain, which is based at Central Saint Martins College of Art and Design at the University of the Arts London. The Collection services the needs of both academics and curators in this specialist area. Its founders describe itsraison d’êtreand collecting policy, and outline some of the challenges of working in an environment susceptible to changing research priorities and uncertain digital storage standards.


1995 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-148
Author(s):  
Matthew Cowie

There is an ambivalent relationship between technology and human rights. Film and video technology not only have the power to control but also to frame accounts of human suffering, protest and attempts to promote human rights. The history of ideologically motivated film making has testified to the plasticity of forms of visual representations. Non-Governmental Organisations in the human rights field should consider the potential and the philosophical limitations of video to their work.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document