scholarly journals Reward motivation enhances coding of task-set information in frontoparietal cortex

Author(s):  
Etzel Joset ◽  
Braver Todd
2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (10) ◽  
pp. 981
Author(s):  
Shinyoung Jung ◽  
Suk Won Han*

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sneha Shashidhara ◽  
Yaara Erez

AbstractSelection and integration of information based on current goals is a fundamental aspect of flexible goal-directed behavior. Reward motivation has been shown to improve behavioral performance across multiple cognitive tasks, yet the underlying neural mechanisms that link motivation and control processes, and in particular its effect on context-dependent information processing, remain unclear. Here, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in 24 human volunteers to test whether reward motivation enhances the coding of behaviorally relevant category distinctions across the frontoparietal cortex, as would be predicted, based on previous experimental evidence and theoretical accounts. In a cued target detection categorization task, participants detected whether an object from a cued visual category was present in a subsequent display. The combination of the cue and the visual category of the object determined the behavioral status of the presented objects. To manipulate reward motivation, half of all trials offered the possibility of a substantial reward. We observed an increase with reward in overall activity across the frontoparietal control network when the cue was presented. Multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) further showed that behavioral status information for the objects presented was conveyed across the network. However, in contrast to our prediction, reward did not increase the discrimination between behavioral status conditions in the stimulus epoch of a trial when object information was processed depending on a current context. In the high-level general object visual region, the lateral occipital complex, the representation of behavioral status was driven by visual differences and was not modulated by reward. Our study provides useful evidence for the limited effects of reward motivation on task-related neural representations.


2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 1647-1659 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joset A. Etzel ◽  
Michael W. Cole ◽  
Jeffrey M. Zacks ◽  
Kendrick N. Kay ◽  
Todd S. Braver

2013 ◽  
Vol 221 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kerstin Jost ◽  
Wouter De Baene ◽  
Iring Koch ◽  
Marcel Brass

The role of cue processing has become a controversial topic in research on cognitive control using task-switching procedures. Some authors suggested a priming account to explain switch costs as a form of encoding benefit when the cue from the previous trial is repeated and hence challenged theories that attribute task-switch costs to task-set (re)configuration. A rich body of empirical evidence has evolved that indeed shows that cue-encoding repetition priming is an important component in task switching. However, these studies also demonstrate that there are usually substantial “true” task-switch costs. Here, we review this behavioral, electrophysiological, and brain imaging evidence. Moreover, we describe alternative approaches to the explicit task-cuing procedure, such as the usage of transition cues or the task-span procedure. In addition, we address issues related to the type of cue, such as cue transparency. We also discuss methodological and theoretical implications and argue that the explicit task-cuing procedure is suitable to address issues of cognitive control and task-set switching.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document