scholarly journals Italian Validation of the Touch Avoidance Measure and the Touch Avoidance Questionnaire

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Casetta ◽  
Luca Rizzi ◽  
Marcello Passarelli ◽  
Giorgio Arcara ◽  
Raffaella Perrella
Author(s):  
Marcello Passarelli ◽  
Laura Casetta ◽  
Luca Rizzi ◽  
Raffaella Perrella

Stress is a physiological response to internal and external events we call “stressors”. Response to the same daily stressors varies across individuals and seems to be higher for women. A possible explanation for this phenomenon is that women perceive sociality, relationships, and intimacy—important sources of both stress and wellbeing—differently from how men experience them. In this study, we investigate how gender, attachment, and touch avoidance predict stress responses on a sample of 335 Italians (216 females; age = 35.82 ± 14.32). Moreover, we analyze the network of relationships between these variables through multiple linear regression and exploratory network analysis techniques. The results recontextualize the role of gender in determining stress responses in terms of (lack of) confidence and touch avoidance toward family members; attitudes toward relationships seem to be the main determinants of stress responses. These results have implications for reducing stress in both clinical settings and at a social level.


Sexual Abuse ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 107906322110281
Author(s):  
Mara Martini ◽  
Stefano Tartaglia ◽  
Norma De Piccoli

The study aimed to validate the Italian version of the Measure for Assessing Subtle Rape Myths developed by McMahon and Farmer. A sample of 3,915 university students (70.8% female) completed the questionnaire. After an exploratory factor analysis, a confirmatory factor analysis tested the resulting four-factor structure of the Italian Subtle Rape Myth Acceptance (SRMA-IT) Scale (“She Asked for It”; “He Didn’t Mean To”; “It Wasn’t Really Rape”; and “She Lied”), consistent with McMahon and Farmer’s initial hypothesis. The Italian validation did not include items related to intoxication. Internal consistency of the subscales was good (α from .78 to .90). Convergent validity between all subscales and System Justification–Gender was detected: A strong relationship was observed ( r is from .19 to .33; p < .001). The independent-sample T test then showed that women accepted all four rape myths significantly less than men: Effect size is more than moderate for the myth “She Asked for It” (Cohen’s d = .60) and between small and moderate for the other myths ( d is from .35 to .42). Acceptance of rape myths is often associated with higher men’s proclivity to rape and with tendency to raped women’s double victimization (they can be not believed or blamed when they disclose the rape). Having a validated instrument to measure rape myth acceptance can enhance empirical research on this topic and help to develop interventions of prevention both for men in the society and for the first responders to disclosures, also sustaining a culture of respect and of contrast to violence.


2009 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 394-408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabio Pace ◽  
Franco Bazzoli ◽  
Roberto Fiocca ◽  
Francesco Di Mario ◽  
Vincenzo Savarino ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 84 ◽  
pp. 283-287
Author(s):  
Riccardo Giorgio Zuffo ◽  
Maria Elisa Maiolo ◽  
Michela Cortini
Keyword(s):  

1987 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 89-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janis F. Andersen ◽  
Peter A. Andersen ◽  
Myron W. Lustig
Keyword(s):  

2009 ◽  
Vol 31 (7) ◽  
pp. 553-564 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefano Federici ◽  
Fabio Meloni ◽  
Alessandra Mancini ◽  
Marco Lauriola ◽  
Marta Olivetti Belardinelli

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (11) ◽  
pp. 3273-3281 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Tacchino ◽  
Michela Ponzio ◽  
Ludovico Pedullà ◽  
Jessica Podda ◽  
Margherita Monti Bragadin ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document