scholarly journals Synovial Complement Factors in Patients with Periprosthetic Joint Infection after Undergoing Revision Arthroplasty of the Hip or Knee Joint

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 434
Author(s):  
Frank Sebastian Fröschen ◽  
Sophia Schell ◽  
Matthias Dominik Wimmer ◽  
Gunnar Thorben Rembert Hischebeth ◽  
Hendrik Kohlhof ◽  
...  

The role and diagnostic value of the synovial complement system in patients with low-grade periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) are unclear. We sought to evaluate, for the first time, the usefulness of synovial complement factors in these patients by measuring the individual synovial fluid levels of complement factors (C1q, C3b/iC3b, C4b, C5, C5a, C9, factor B, factor D, factor H, factor I, properdin, and mannose-binding lectin [MBL]). The patients (n = 74) were classified into septic (n = 28) and aseptic (n = 46). Receiver-operator characteristic curves and a multiple regression model to determine the feasibility of a combination of the tested cytokines to determine the infection status were calculated. The synovial fluid levels of C1q, C3b/C3i, C4b, C5, C5a, MBL, and properdin were significantly elevated in the PJI group. The best sensitivity and specificity was found for C1q. The multiple regression models revealed that the combination of C1q, C3b/C3i, C4b, C5, C5a, and MBL was associated with the best sensitivity (83.3%) and specificity (79.2%) for a cutoff value of 0.62 (likelihood ratio: 4.0; area under the curve: 0.853). Nevertheless, only a combined model showed acceptable results. The expression patterns of the complement factors suggested that PJI activates all three pathways of the complement system.

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
André Busch ◽  
Marcus Jäger ◽  
Harald Engler ◽  
Marcel Haversath ◽  
Charlotte Bielefeld ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Since a „gold-standard“ is missing, diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains a challenge in orthopedic surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of serum and synovial fluid Procalcitonin (S-PCT and SF-PCT) as a diagnostic parameter and to compare it to the biomarkers recommended in the 2018 Definition of periprosthetic hip and knee infection. Methods: Between August 2018 and July 2019, a prospective cohort study was conducted in 70 patients with painful hip, shoulder and knee arthroplasty. Besides medical history, clinical and laboratory data was gathered. PJI was diagnosed based on the 2018 Definition of periprosthetic hip and knee infection. Preoperative blood and synovial joint fluid were taken for PCT measurement. S-PCT levels were quantified under the use of immunoassay (Centaur, Siemens, Germany). SF- PCT levels were measured using a standard quantitative PCT enzyme immunoassay kit, according to the manufacturers' instructions (Anti-Procalcitonin antibody ab166963, ABCAM, Cambridge,UK). Results: Twenty three patients (33%) were classified as the PJI group and fourty seven patient (67%) as the aseptic group. The mean levels of S-PCT were significantly (p<0.001) higher than those in the aseptic group (PJI 0.05 ng/mL (0.0-1.03) vs. aseptic 0.02 ng/mL (0.0-0.18)). In synovial fluid, the mean PCT values in the aseptic group were significantly higher (p<0.001) than those of PJI group (PJI 2.7 ng/mL (0.53-9.7) vs. aseptic 8.7 ng/mL (0.25-87.9)). S- PCT, with a cut-off level of 0.5 ng/mL, had a sensitivity of 13.0% and a specifity of 91.0%. SF-PCT, with a cut-off level of 5.0 ng/mL, had a sensitivity of 13.0% and a specifity of 52.0%. Conclusion: S-PCT and SF-PCT appeared to be no reliable biomarkers in the differential diagnosis of PJI from aseptic loosening in total joint arthroplasty.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
André Busch ◽  
Marcus Jäger ◽  
Harald Engler ◽  
Marcel Haversath ◽  
Charlotte Bielefeld ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Since a „gold-standard“ is missing, diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains a challenge in orthopedic surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of serum and synovial fluid Procalcitonin (S-PCT and SF-PCT) as a diagnostic parameter and to compare it to the biomarkers recommended in the 2018 Definition of periprosthetic hip and knee infection. Methods: Between August 2018 and July 2019, a prospective cohort study was conducted in 70 patients with painful hip, shoulder and knee arthroplasty. Besides medical history, clinical and laboratory data was gathered. PJI was diagnosed based on the 2018 Definition of periprosthetic hip and knee infection. Preoperative blood and synovial joint fluid were taken for PCT measurement. S-PCT and SF-PCT levels were measured using standard quantitative PCT enzyme immunoassays. Results: Twenty three patients (33%) were classified as the PJI group and fourty seven patient (67%) as the aseptic group. The mean levels of S-PCT were significantly (p<0.001) higher in the PJI group than those in the aseptic group (PJI 0.05 ng/mL ± 0.21 (0.0-1.03) vs. aseptic 0.02 ng/mL ± 0.03 (0.0-0.18)). In synovial fluid, the mean PCT values in the aseptic group were significantly higher (p<0.001) than those of PJI group (PJI 2.7 ng/mL ± 1.4 (0.53-9.7) vs. aseptic 8.7 ng/mL ± 2.5 (0.25-87.9)). S- PCT, with a cut-off level of 0.5 ng/mL, had a sensitivity of 13.0% and a specificity of 91.0%. SF-PCT, with a cut-off level of 5.0 ng/mL, had a sensitivity of 13.0% and a specificity of 52.0%. Conclusion: S-PCT and SF-PCT appeared to be no reliable biomarkers in the differential diagnosis of PJI from aseptic loosening in total joint arthroplasty.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
André Busch ◽  
Marcus Jäger ◽  
Harald Engler ◽  
Marcel Haversath ◽  
Charlotte Bielefeld ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Since a „gold-standard“ is missing, diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains a challenge in orthopedic surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of serum and synovial fluid Procalcitonin (S-PCT and SF-PCT) as a diagnostic parameter and to compare it to the biomarkers recommended in the 2018 Definition of periprosthetic hip and knee infection.Methods:Between August 2018 and July 2019, a prospective cohort study was conducted in 70 patients with painful hip, shoulder and knee arthroplasty. Besides medical history, clinical and laboratory data was gathered. PJI was diagnosed based on the 2018 Definition of periprosthetic hip and knee infection. Preoperative blood and synovial joint fluid were taken for PCT measurement. S-PCT and SF-PCT levels were measured using standard quantitative PCT enzyme immunoassays.Results: Twenty three patients (33%) were classified as the PJI group and fourty seven patient (67%) as the aseptic group. The mean levels of S-PCT were significantly (p<0.001) higher in the PJI group than those in the aseptic group (PJI 0.05 ± 0.21 ng/mL (0.0-1.03) vs. aseptic 0.02 ± 0.03 ng/mL (0.0-0.18)). In synovial fluid, the mean PCT values in the aseptic group were significantly higher (p<0.001) than those of PJI group (PJI 2.7 ± 1.4 ng/mL (0.53-9.7) vs. aseptic 8.7 ± 2.5 ng/mL (0.25-87.9)). S- PCT, with a cut-off level of 0.5 ng/mL, had a sensitivity of 13.0% and a specificity of 91.0%.SF-PCT, with a cut-off level of 5.0 ng/mL, had a sensitivity of 13.0% and a specificity of 52.0%.Conclusion: S-PCT and SF-PCT appeared to be no reliable biomarkers in the differential diagnosis of PJI from aseptic loosening in total joint arthroplasty.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
André Busch ◽  
Marcus Jäger ◽  
Harald Engler ◽  
Marcel Haversath ◽  
Charlotte Bielefeld ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Since a „gold-standard“ is missing, diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection remains a challenge in orthopedic surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of serum and synovial fluid Procalcitonin (PCT) as a diagnostic parameter and to compare it to the biomarkers recommended in the 2018 Definition of periprosthetic hip and knee infection.Methods Between August 2018 and July 2019, a prospective cohort study was conducted in 70 patients with painful hip, shoulder and knee arthroplasty. Besides medical history, clinical and laboratory data was gathered. PJI was diagnosed based on the 2018 Definition of periprosthetic hip and knee infection. Preoperative blood and synovial joint fluid were taken for PCT measurement. Serum PCT levels were quantified under the use of immunoassay (Centaur, Siemens, Germany). Synovial PCT levels were measured using a standard quantitative PCT enzyme immunoassay kit, according to the manufacturers' instructions (Anti-Procalcitonin antibody ab166963, ABCAM, Cambridge,UK).Results Twenty three patients (33%) were classified as the PJI group and fourty seven patient (67%) as the aseptic group. The mean levels of serum PCT was significantly (p<0.001) higher than those in the aseptic group (PJI 0.05 ng/mL (0.0-1.03) vs. aseptic 0.02 ng/mL (0.0-0.18)). In synovial fluid, the mean values in the aseptic group were significantly higher (p<0.001) than those of PJI group (PJI 2.7 ng/mL (0.53-9.7) vs. aseptic 8.7 ng/mL (0.25-87.9)). Serum PCT, with a cut-off level of 0.5 ng/mL, had a sensitivity of 13.0% and a specifity of 91.0%. Synvial fluid PCT, with a cut-off level of 5.0 ng/mL, had a sensitivity of 13.0% and a specifity of 52.0%.Conclusion Serum and SF-PCT appeared to be no reliable biomarkers in the differential diagnosis of PJI from aseptic loosening in total joint arthroplasty.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
André Busch ◽  
Marcus Jäger ◽  
Harald Engler ◽  
Marcel Haversath ◽  
Charlotte Bielefeld ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Since a „gold-standard“ is missing, diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains a challenge in orthopedic surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of serum and synovial fluid Procalcitonin (S-PCT and SF-PCT) as a diagnostic parameter and to compare it to the biomarkers recommended in the 2018 Definition of periprosthetic hip and knee infection.Methods:Between August 2018 and July 2019, a prospective cohort study was conducted in 70 patients with painful hip, shoulder and knee arthroplasty. Besides medical history, clinical and laboratory data was gathered. PJI was diagnosed based on the 2018 Definition of periprosthetic hip and knee infection. Preoperative blood and synovial joint fluid were taken for PCT measurement. S-PCT and SF-PCT levels were measured using standard quantitative PCT enzyme immunoassays.Results: Twenty three patients (33%) were classified as the PJI group and fourty seven patient (67%) as the aseptic group. The mean levels of S-PCT were significantly (p<0.001) higher in the PJI group than those in the aseptic group (PJI 0.05 ± 0.21 ng/mL (0.0-1.03) vs. aseptic 0.02 ± 0.03 ng/mL (0.0-0.18)). In synovial fluid, the mean PCT values in the aseptic group were significantly higher (p<0.001) than those of PJI group (PJI 2.7 ± 1.4 ng/mL (0.53-9.7) vs. aseptic 8.7 ± 2.5 ng/mL (0.25-87.9)). S- PCT, with a cut-off level of 0.5 ng/mL, had a sensitivity of 13.0% and a specificity of 91.0%.SF-PCT, with a cut-off level of 5.0 ng/mL, had a sensitivity of 13.0% and a specificity of 52.0%.Conclusion: S-PCT and SF-PCT appeared to be no reliable biomarkers in the differential diagnosis of PJI from aseptic loosening in total joint arthroplasty.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
André Busch ◽  
Marcus Jäger ◽  
Harald Engler ◽  
Marcel Haversath ◽  
Charlotte Bielefeld ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Since a „gold-standard“ is missing, diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains a challenge in orthopedic surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of serum and synovial fluid Procalcitonin (S-PCT and SF-PCT) as a diagnostic parameter and to compare it to the biomarkers recommended in the 2018 Definition of periprosthetic hip and knee infection. Methods: Between August 2018 and July 2019, a prospective cohort study was conducted in 70 patients with painful hip, shoulder and knee arthroplasty. Besides medical history, clinical and laboratory data was gathered. PJI was diagnosed based on the 2018 Definition of periprosthetic hip and knee infection. Preoperative blood and synovial joint fluid were taken for PCT measurement. S-PCT and SF-PCT levels were measured using standard quantitative PCT enzyme immunoassays. Results: Twenty three patients (33%) were classified as the PJI group and fourty seven patient (67%) as the aseptic group. The mean levels of S-PCT were significantly (p<0.001) higher in the PJI group than those in the aseptic group (PJI 0.05 ng/mL ± 0.21 (0.0-1.03) vs. aseptic 0.02 ng/mL ± 0.03 (0.0-0.18)). In synovial fluid, the mean PCT values in the aseptic group were significantly higher (p<0.001) than those of PJI group (PJI 2.7 ng/mL ± 1.4 (0.53-9.7) vs. aseptic 8.7 ng/mL ± 2.5 (0.25-87.9)). S- PCT, with a cut-off level of 0.5 ng/mL, had a sensitivity of 13.0% and a specificity of 91.0%. SF-PCT, with a cut-off level of 5.0 ng/mL, had a sensitivity of 13.0% and a specificity of 52.0%. Conclusion: S-PCT and SF-PCT appeared to be no reliable biomarkers in the differential diagnosis of PJI from aseptic loosening in total joint arthroplasty.


2017 ◽  
Vol 99 (24) ◽  
pp. 2077-2084 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong Seuk Lee ◽  
Kyung-Hoi Koo ◽  
Hyun Jung Kim ◽  
Shaoqi Tian ◽  
Tae-Young Kim ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (11) ◽  
pp. 3537-3540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mick P. Kelly ◽  
Brian Darrith ◽  
Charles P. Hannon ◽  
Denis Nam ◽  
P. Maxwell Courtney ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document