scholarly journals Land Use Regression Modelling of Outdoor NO2 and PM2.5 Concentrations in Three Low Income Areas in the Western Cape Province, South Africa

Author(s):  
Apolline Saucy ◽  
Martin Röösli ◽  
Nino Künzli ◽  
Ming-Yi Tsai ◽  
Chloé Sieber ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anniza de Villiers ◽  
Nelia P. Steyn ◽  
Catherine E. Draper ◽  
Jillian Hill ◽  
Lucinda Dalais ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 610-611 ◽  
pp. 1439-1447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheena Muttoo ◽  
Lisa Ramsay ◽  
Bert Brunekreef ◽  
Rob Beelen ◽  
Kees Meliefste ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Chloé Sieber ◽  
Martina S. Ragettli ◽  
Mark Brink ◽  
Olaniyan Toyib ◽  
Roslyn Baatjies ◽  
...  

In developing countries, noise exposure and its negative health effects have been little explored. The present study aimed to assess the noise exposure situation in adults living in informal settings in the Western Cape Province, South Africa. We conducted continuous one-week outdoor noise measurements at 134 homes in four different areas. These data were used to develop a land use regression (LUR) model to predict A-weighted day-evening-night equivalent sound level (Lden) from geographic information system (GIS) variables. Mean noise exposure during day (6:00-18:00) was 60.0 A-weighted decibels (dB(A)) (interquartile range 56.9-62.9 dB(A)), during night (22:00-6:00) 52.9 dB(A) (49.3-55.8 dB(A)) and average Lden was 63.0 dB(A) (60.1-66.5 dB(A)). Main predictors of the LUR model were related to road traffic and household density. Model performance was low (adjusted R2=0.130) suggesting that other influences than represented in the geographic predictors are relevant for noise exposure. This is one of the few studies on the noise exposure situation in low- and middle-income countries. It demonstrates that noise exposure levels are high in these settings.


Author(s):  
Chloé Sieber ◽  
Martina S. Ragettli ◽  
Mark Brink ◽  
Olaniyan Toyib ◽  
Roslyn Baatjies ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Goosen ◽  
M.H. McLachlan ◽  
C. Schübl

The promotion of exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months of life is estimated to be the most effective measure to save infants from morbidity and mortality in low-income settings. South Africa is challenged by very poor exclusive breastfeeding practices (6.8–8.3%) during the first six months of life. In the low-income area investigated, the exclusive breastfeeding rate was 6% in 2011. The aim of this study was to describe the factors impeding exclusive breastfeeding practices in a low-income area of the Western Cape Province of South Africa in order to provide recommendations on tailored and generalisable intervention strategies for the promotion of exclusive breastfeeding practices. Focus group discussions were conducted with caregivers and health care workers. Several barriers to exclusive breastfeeding practices were reported and seven themes were identified during data analysis: 1) the perception that infants needed water, gripe water and Lennon’s Behoedmiddel; 2) the concern that milk alone does not satisfy an infant; 3) inadequate infant feeding education and support by the health system; 4) the lack of community-based postnatal support; 5) convention and family influence; 6) mothers separated from infants; and 7) local beliefs about maternal behaviour and breastfeeding. The barriers to exclusive breastfeeding practices proved to be multifaceted and interlinked. The influence of convention and community perceptions and beliefs combined with suboptimal infant feeding education by the health system and the lack of local postnatal breastfeeding support initiatives posed an intricate group of barriers to exclusive breastfeeding practices.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document