scholarly journals Debates: An Useful Tool to Promote Students Deeper Thinking in Stem Disciplines

Proceedings ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (21) ◽  
pp. 1341
Author(s):  
María Victoria Gil-Álvarez ◽  
Juan Antonio Doncel-Luengo ◽  
Óscar López-López ◽  
María Isabel Rodríguez-Cáceres ◽  
Mónica Palomino-Vasco

The utility of debates for the evaluation of a series of transversal competences related to critical thinking is highlighted. Our main target has been to depict a novel evaluation methodology via discussion through a directed discussion system in a STEM discipline.

2000 ◽  
Vol 64 (8) ◽  
pp. 610-615 ◽  
Author(s):  
LS Behar-Horenstein ◽  
TA Dolan ◽  
FJ Courts ◽  
GS Mitchell

1999 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 6-6
Author(s):  
Barbara Shadden
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Claudia Moatti ◽  
Janet Lloyd ◽  
Malcolm Schofield

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Jiang ◽  
Ang Gao ◽  
Baiyin Yang

Abstract. This study uses implicit voice theory to examine the influence of employees’ critical thinking and leaders’ inspirational motivation on employees’ voice behavior via voice efficacy. The results of a pretest of 302 employees using critical thinking questionnaires and a field study of 273 dyads of supervisors and their subordinates revealed that both employees’ critical thinking and leaders’ inspirational motivation had a positive effect on employees’ voice and that voice efficacy mediates the relationships among employees’ critical thinking, leaders’ inspirational motivation, and employees’ voice. Implications for research and practice are discussed.


PsycCRITIQUES ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 52 (20) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pam Marek ◽  
Chris Randall
Keyword(s):  

PsycCRITIQUES ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 59 (15) ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard E. Mayer
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document