scholarly journals Soil Seed Bank and Plant Community Development in Passive Restoration of Degraded Sandy Grasslands

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 581 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renhui Miao ◽  
Yongheng Song ◽  
Zhaolin Sun ◽  
Meixia Guo ◽  
Zhenxing Zhou ◽  
...  
2004 ◽  
Vol 92 (5) ◽  
pp. 824-834 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. B. DE DEYN ◽  
C. E. RAAIJMAKERS ◽  
W. H. VAN DER PUTTEN

Wetlands ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 373-385 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Katherine Kirkman ◽  
P. Charles Goebel ◽  
Larry West ◽  
Mark B. Drew ◽  
Brian J. Palik

1998 ◽  
Vol 78 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian G. W. Corns ◽  
D. G. Maynard

The effects of soil compaction and depth of chipped aspen residue on aspen regeneration, plant community development, decomposition, and nutrient cycling were tested on an Orthic Gray Luvisol in the Lower Foothills of Alberta. Twenty-seven 100-m × 15-m plots were established in 1992. Three depths of chipped aspen residue (0, 1–5 cm and >10 cm) and three levels of compaction (no compaction, 6 and 16 skidder passes) were applied following whole-tree harvesting in 1993. Sixteen skidder passes and chip residue depths >10 cm resulted in reduced plant cover and aspen sucker densities for at least 2 yr following treatment. Nutrient concentrations of the chip residue and surface organic horizon (LFH) were similar for the three compaction treatments. The initial total nitrogen (N) concentration of the chipped aspen residue was 3.6 g kg−1. Ammonium (NH4+-N) concentrations in the LFH of the chip residue treatments, particularly at the >10-cm residue depth, were lower compared with the no-residue treatment. However, adequate N apparently was available to the aspen suckers and understory vegetation as the NH4+-N concentration remained higher than in the LFH before harvesting. Compaction and woody residue applications had only short-term (3 yr) effects on soil properties, plant community development and aspen suckering at this site when clear-cut harvesting was done in the fall with low soil moisture content. Key words: Ammonium, aspen regeneration, wood residue, compaction


1988 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 372 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. W. Smith ◽  
E. J. Depuit ◽  
B. Z. Richardson

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-28
Author(s):  
Jordan Meyer-Morey ◽  
Matthew Lavin ◽  
Jane Mangold ◽  
Catherine Zabinski ◽  
Lisa J. Rew

Abstract Non-native plant invasions can have devastating effects on native plant communities; conversely management efforts can have non-target and deleterious impacts on desirable plants. In the arid sagebrush steppe rangelands of the western United States, non-native winter annual species affect forage production and biodiversity. One method proposed to control these species is to suppress the soil seed bank using the pre-emergent herbicide indaziflam. Our goal was to evaluate the efficacy of indaziflam to control non-native annual mustards (Alyssum spp.) and to understand potential non-target effects of management on the diverse mountain sagebrush steppe plant communities within Yellowstone National Park. Six sites were established along an elevation gradient (1615 – 2437m), each with high and low Alyssum spp. infestations. We applied 63g ai ha−1 of indaziflam in late summer of 2018 and evaluated plant community cover in situ for two years after treatment, and emergence of forb species from the soil seed bank ex situ. Indaziflam was highly effective at controlling Alyssum spp. emergence for two years. Richness and Shannon’s diversity of the non-target plant community were significantly lower in sprayed plots than the control, and both decreased along the elevation gradient. These reductions were due to a decrease in perennial forbs and native annual forbs in the sprayed plots; perennial graminoids were not affected. Overall, the above ground and seed bank community composition was negatively impacted by indaziflam, and these effects were strongest for the native annual forbs that rely on annual regeneration from the seed bank. The effects of this herbicide to the non-target community should be evaluated beyond the length of our study time, however we conclude indaziflam should likely be reserved for use in areas that are severely invaded and have seed banks that are comprised of non-desirable species rather than diverse, native mountain sagebrush communities.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document