scholarly journals Outcome analysis of upper and lower limb motor functions after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for degenerative cervical disc disease

2020 ◽  
pp. 238-244
Author(s):  
Ninad N. Srikhande ◽  
V.A. Kiran Kumar ◽  
N.A. Sai Kiran ◽  
Amrita Ghosh ◽  
Ranabir Pal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lower Limb ◽  
Anterior Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Cervical Disc ◽  
Motor Deficits ◽  
Disc Prolapse ◽  
Motor Power ◽  
Cervical Disc Disease ◽  
Disc Disease ◽  
Degenerative Cervical Disc Disease ◽  
Flexion Extension

Background: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is the most commonly performed surgical procedure for symptomatic cervical disc disease. In this study, we analysed the upper and lower limb motor functions after ACDF for disc prolapse in patients with degenerative cervical disc disease. Methods: One hundred consecutive adult patients who underwent ACDF for single or two-level cervical disc prolapse during the study period (October 2015 to October 2017) were included in the study. Results: Preoperative motor deficits in limbs were noted in 73% (73/100) of the patients. Enhance recovery of motor deficits was noted in 72.6% (53/73) of these patients and persisting motor deficits in the remaining patients (20/73- 27.4%). Five patients (5/27- 18.5%) without any preoperative motor deficits developed motor deficits after ACDF. Detailed pre and postoperative (at the time of discharge) motor power (graded by MRC grade) in all 4 limbs (Shoulder abduction/adduction/flexion/extension, elbow flexion/extension, wrist flexion/extension, hip abduction/adduction/flexion/extension, knee flexion/extension, ankle flexion/extension) was recorded. Statistically significant improvement in motor power (as recorded at the time of discharge) was noted in all the tested muscle groups after ACDF. Conclusion: Early improvement in preoperative motor deficits can be expected in the majority of the patients with cervical PIVD following ACDF.

scholarly journals Polyetheretherketone Cages Alone with Allograft for Three-Level Anterior Cervical Fusion

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hong Liu ◽  
Avraam Ploumis ◽  
Chunde Li ◽  
Xiaodong Yi ◽  
Hong Li
Keyword(s):  
Fusion Rate ◽  
Sagittal Profile ◽  
Cervical Disc ◽  
Cervical Disc Disease ◽  
Disc Disease ◽  
Japanese Orthopedic Association ◽  
Degenerative Cervical Disc Disease ◽  
Visual Analog Scales ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Cage Subsidence

A total of 25 consecutive patients suffering from degenerative cervical disc disease who underwent three-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) including polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages packed with allograft were followed up for at least two years. The fusion rate reached 72% (18/25), and asymptomatic pseudarthrosis was seen in 6 patients but without mobility on flexion-extension radiographs, and revision surgery was not needed. Cage subsidence occurred at one level (C67), but it was not progressive, and reoperation was not necessary. A significant increase (P<0.001) in fused segment angle (FSA) and fused segment height (FSH) was observed postoperatively. Similarly, a significant clinical improvement (P<0.001) was demonstrated postoperatively in terms of Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score and visual analog scales (VASs) score. PEEK cages alone with allograft proved to be a safe and effective surgical option in the treatment of three-level degenerative cervical disc disease. Although the fusion rate was not high, this technique may offer improvement of symptomatology and maintenance of cervical spine's sagittal profile.

scholarly journals Adjacent-level arthroplasty following cervical fusion

2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. E5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deshpande V. Rajakumar ◽  
Akshay Hari ◽  
Murali Krishna ◽  
Subhas Konar ◽  
Ankit Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Cobb Angle ◽  
Anterior Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Cervical Disc ◽  
Cervical Fusion ◽  
Adjacent Level ◽  
Cervical Disc Disease ◽  
Disc Disease ◽  
Cervical Arthroplasty ◽  
Arm Pain

OBJECTIVE Adjacent-level disc degeneration following cervical fusion has been well reported. This condition poses a major treatment dilemma when it becomes symptomatic. The potential application of cervical arthroplasty to preserve motion in the affected segment is not well documented, with few studies in the literature. The authors present their initial experience of analyzing clinical and radiological results in such patients who were treated with arthroplasty for new or persistent arm and/or neck symptoms related to neural compression due to adjacent-segment disease after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). METHODS During a 5-year period, 11 patients who had undergone ACDF anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and subsequently developed recurrent neck or arm pain related to adjacent-level cervical disc disease were treated with cervical arthroplasty at the authors' institution. A total of 15 devices were implanted (range of treated levels per patient: 1–3). Clinical evaluation was performed both before and after surgery, using a visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and the Neck Disability Index (NDI). Radiological outcomes were analyzed using pre- and postoperative flexion/extension lateral radiographs measuring Cobb angle (overall C2–7 sagittal alignment), functional spinal unit (FSU) angle, and range of motion (ROM). RESULTS There were no major perioperative complications or device-related failures. Statistically significant results, obtained in all cases, were reflected by an improvement in VAS scores for neck/arm pain and NDI scores for neck pain. Radiologically, statistically significant increases in the overall lordosis (as measured by Cobb angle) and ROM at the treated disc level were observed. Three patients were lost to follow-up within the first year after arthroplasty. In the remaining 8 cases, the duration of follow-up ranged from 1 to 3 years. None of these 8 patients required surgery for the same vertebral level during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS Artificial cervical disc replacement in patients who have previously undergone cervical fusion surgery appears to be safe, with encouraging early clinical results based on this small case series, but more data from larger numbers of patients with long-term follow-up are needed. Arthroplasty may provide an additional tool for the management of post-fusion adjacent-level cervical disc disease in carefully selected patients.

Treatment of Degenerative Cervical Disc Disease with Uncoforaminotomy – Intermediate Clinical Outcome

2008 ◽  
Vol 51 (04) ◽  
pp. 211-217 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Pechlivanis ◽  
C. Brenke ◽  
M. Scholz ◽  
M. Engelhardt ◽  
A. Harders ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Cervical Disc ◽  
Cervical Disc Disease ◽  
Disc Disease ◽  
Degenerative Cervical Disc Disease

Analysis of the three United States Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption cervical arthroplasty trials

2012 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 216-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheerag D. Upadhyaya ◽  
Jau-Ching Wu ◽  
Gregory Trost ◽  
Regis W. Haid ◽  
Vincent C. Traynelis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Random Effects ◽  
Anterior Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Cervical Disc ◽  
Adjacent Level ◽  
Cervical Disc Disease ◽  
Disc Disease ◽  
Single Level ◽  
Investigational Device Exemption ◽  
Time Point

Object There are now 3 randomized, multicenter, US FDA investigational device exemption, industry-sponsored studies comparing arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for single-level cervical disease with 2 years of follow-up. These 3 studies evaluated the Prestige ST, Bryan, and ProDisc-C artificial discs. The authors analyzed the combined results of these trials. Methods A total of 1213 patients with symptomatic, single-level cervical disc disease were randomized into 2 treatment arms in the 3 randomized trials. Six hundred twenty-one patients received an artificial cervical disc, and 592 patients were treated with ACDF. In the three trials, 94% of the arthroplasty group and 87% of the ACDF group have completed 2 years of follow-up. The authors analyzed the 2-year data from these 3 trials including previously unpublished source data. Statistical analysis was performed with fixed and random effects models. Results The authors' analysis revealed that segmental sagittal motion was preserved with arthroplasty (preoperatively 7.26° and postoperatively 8.14°) at the 2-year time point. The fusion rate for ACDF at 2 years was 95%. The Neck Disability Index, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey Mental, and Physical Component Summaries, neck pain, and arm pain scores were not statistically different between the groups at the 24-month follow-up. The arthroplasty group demonstrated superior results at 24 months in neurological success (RR 0.595, I2 = 0%, p = 0.006). The arthroplasty group had a lower rate of secondary surgeries at the 2-year time point (RR 0.44, I2 = 0%, p = 0.004). At the 2-year time point, the reoperation rate for adjacent-level disease was lower for the arthroplasty group when the authors analyzed the combined data set using a fixed effects model (RR 0.460, I2 = 2.9%, p = 0.030), but this finding was not significant using a random effects model. Adverse event reporting was too heterogeneous between the 3 trials to combine for analysis. Conclusions Both anterior cervical discectomy and fusion as well as arthroplasty demonstrate excellent 2-year surgical results for the treatment of 1-level cervical disc disease with radiculopathy. Arthroplasty is associated with a lower rate of secondary surgery and a higher rate of neurological success at 2 years. Arthroplasty may be associated with a lower rate of adjacent-level disease at 2 years, but further follow-up and analysis are needed to confirm this finding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document