Microbeam analysis. Selected instrumental performance parameters for the specification and checking of energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometers for use in electron probe microanalysis

2012 ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 14 (S2) ◽  
pp. 1152-1153
Author(s):  
K Keil ◽  
R Fitzgerald ◽  
KFJ Heinrich

Extended abstract of a paper presented at Microscopy and Microanalysis 2008 in Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA, August 3 – August 7, 2008


2001 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 419-426 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Osán ◽  
J. de Hoog ◽  
P. Van Espen ◽  
I. Szalóki ◽  
C.-U. Ro ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Vol 4 (S2) ◽  
pp. 222-223
Author(s):  
John J. Donovan

A number of problematic analytical situations are known to exist in electron probe microanalysis (EPMA) where characteristic x-ray spectral overlaps are not only severe, but are also of the “self-interfering” or “cascade” variety. The “self-interfering” variety is exemplified by the innocuous Ba Lα ↔ Ti Kα; to the fearsome Pb Lα↔As Kα binaries, while “cascade” interferences are often seen among the transition metal series as in Ti Kβ → V Kα - V Kα Cr Kα or as seen with a secondary fluorescence interference effect as in Ni K ⇒ Fe Kα - Fe Kβ → Co Kα. Unlike simple interferences of the type Mn Kβ → Fe Kα, both of these types of spectral interferences are often quite troublesome for the analyst to correct for, especially for Si(Li) and Ge energy dispersive spectrometers (EDS) where the analytical peaks are often so overlapped as to prevent graphical deconvolution, and even for the higher resolution wavelength dispersive spectrometers (WDS) along with the yet to come bolometric energy dispersive detectors (based on projected resolution), the task can still be formidable.


2011 ◽  
Vol 17 (S2) ◽  
pp. 614-615
Author(s):  
V-D Hodoroaba

Extended abstract of a paper presented at Microscopy and Microanalysis 2011 in Nashville, Tennessee, USA, August 7–August 11, 2011.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document