Faculty Opinions recommendation of A phase II study of erlotinib in gemcitabine refractory advanced pancreatic cancer.

Author(s):  
Alexandru Grigorescu
2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (14_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4119-4119 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.-L. Van Laethem ◽  
M. Polus ◽  
R. Marechal ◽  
A. Demols ◽  
F. Gay ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 429-429 ◽  
Author(s):  
Makoto Ueno ◽  
Shinichi Ohkawa ◽  
Noritoshi Kobayashi ◽  
Kazuya Sugimori ◽  
Yoshiaki Kawaguchi ◽  
...  

429 Background: Gemcitabine is one of the standard chemotherapeutic agents for pancreatic cancer in a first-line setting. In a second-line setting, there are various unmet needs. After gemcitabine chemotherapy, S-1 is mainly used and sometimes gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) is used. Cytotoxic effect of gemcitabine had been reported to have the potential to be enhanced when used with fluorouracil. This randomized study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine plus S-1 in gemcitabine-refractory advanced pancreatic cancer. Methods: This phase II study consisted of patients (pts) who were randomly allocated into the GS group (gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 plus S-1 60, 80, or 100 mg/d according to body-surface area on days 1 through 14 of a 21-day cycle) or the S-1 group (S-1 80, 100, or 120 mg/d according to body-surface area on days 1 through 28 of a 42-day cycle) at a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint was the evaluation of progression-free survival (PFS). The sample size of 90 pts was chosen based on the randomized phase II selection design reported by Simon et al.(1985). The design suggests a correct selection probability of 75% with two-sided significance level of 0.10 if median PFS is 3.3 mo and 2.0 mo in GS and S-1 groups. Results: From Jan 2012 to March 2015, randomized 51 pts were examined (GS: 26, S-1: 25). This study was discontinued due to slow accrual. The median PFS of GS group was 2.0 mo while the S-1 group was 2.1 mo. The hazard ratio was 1.06 [95%CI 0.60-1.86]; (p=0.844). The median survival times were 3.8 mo in GS group and 5.5 mo in S-1 group, respectively. The hazard ratio was 1.02 [95%CI 0.57-1.81]; (p=0.96). The response rates were 4.2% and 4.3%. The disease control rates were 33.4% and 30.4%. Although bone marrow suppression is higher in GS group, the toxicities were manageable in both groups. Grade 3/4 toxicities (GS/S-1 %) included: neutropenia, 53.8/8; hemoglobin, 30.8/28.0; thrombocytopenia, 7.7/4.0; nausea, 0/8.0; anorexia 11.5/16.0, fatigue 7.7/0 and diarrhea, 3.8/4.0. Conclusions: Gemcitabine plus S-1 is not more effective than S-1 in gemcitabine-refractory advanced pancreatic cancer. Clinical trial information: 000007173.


2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jung Hoon Kim ◽  
Sang-Cheol Lee ◽  
Sung Yong Oh ◽  
Seo-Young Song ◽  
Namsu Lee ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 1203-1207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel J. Renouf ◽  
Patricia A. Tang ◽  
Pierre Major ◽  
Monika K. Krzyzanowska ◽  
Bindi Dhesy-Thind ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 50 (11) ◽  
pp. 1909-1915 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.J. Renouf ◽  
P.A. Tang ◽  
D. Hedley ◽  
E. Chen ◽  
S. Kamel-Reid ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (14_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4119-4119 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.-L. Van Laethem ◽  
M. Polus ◽  
R. Marechal ◽  
A. Demols ◽  
F. Gay ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document