Salvage Treatment
Recently Published Documents





PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. e0257551
Masashi Ishikawa ◽  
Atsuo Takashima ◽  
Yusuke Nagata ◽  
Ryoichi Sawada ◽  
Masahiko Aoki ◽  

Background In clinical practice, the same chemotherapeutic agents are occasionally reused (re-challenge) after failure of all available standard chemotherapy options for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, the benefits of re-challenge chemotherapy (Re-Cx) are unclear. This retrospective study evaluated the efficacy of Re-Cx, focusing on the tumor growth rate (TGR). Methods The study included mCRC patients with measurable lesions who received Re-Cx from November 2011 to October 2018 at National Cancer Center Hospital. Re-Cx was defined as re-administration of agents which had been used in prior lines of chemotherapy and discontinued due to disease progression. We compared the TGR immediately after initiating Re-Cx regimens with that observed at the time of disease progression during prior chemotherapy (Prior-Cx) immediately before Re-Cx. Results Of the 25 patients who received Re-Cx, five patients received two Re-Cx regimens. Therefore, a total of 30 cases of Re-Cx were analyzed in this study. The regimens of Re-Cx were oxaliplatin based (19 cases), irinotecan based (8 cases), and others (3 cases). Although the objective response rate to Re-Cx was 0%, the disease control rate was 60% (18 cases), and 40% (12 cases) showed some tumor shrinkage. We compared the effects of Re-Cx and Prior-Cx by the TGR and found that the TGR of Re-Cx was slower than that recorded in Prior-Cx in 26 of 30 cases (87%). In particular, the ratio of% TGR <0, which indicates tumor shrinkage, was obtained in 13 of 30 cases (43.3%). The median progression-free survival and overall survival after Re-Cx were 3.8 and 6.57 months, respectively. Conclusion We found that Re-Cx may have some anti-tumor efficacy as salvage treatment for mCRC and these results also suggested the clinical benefits of Re-Cx.

2021 ◽  
Xue Tang ◽  
Zhi Wan ◽  
Xia Guo ◽  
Ju Guo

Abstract Background Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) has been defined as a disorder driven by misguided myeloid differentiation, with up to 50% of cases harboring the BRAF-V600E mutation. Salvage treatment with LCH refractory to vinblastine and steroid regimen is intractable. Vemurafenib is safe and effective in children with refractory BRAF-V600E-positive LCH, but the disease always reactivates with the withdrawal of vemurafenib. Case presentation: Here, we report the first case of BRAF-V600E positive LCH resistant to vemurafenib therapy but effectively salvaged by cytarabine-based chemotherapy. Conclusions Our case report shows that vemurafenib monotherapy might not be effective for every BRAF-V600E-positive refractory LCH, and cytarabine-based chemotherapy might still be a cost-effective therapeutic alternative. Keywords: Langerhans cell histiocytosis, BRAF-V600E mutation, Vemurafenib, Chemotherapy

2021 ◽  
Hirotaka Hasegawa ◽  
Kunal Vakharia ◽  
Link J Michael ◽  
Scott L Stafford ◽  
Paul D Brown ◽  

Abstract PurposeTo clarify the role of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for atypical meningiomas (AM).MethodsA retrospective analysis of 68 patients with AM having SRS from 1995 until 2019. Nineteen patients (28%) had undergone prior external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) (median dose, 54 Gy). The median follow-up period was 52 months.ResultsEighteen (26%), 17 (25%), and 33 (49%) patients received SRS as an upfront adjuvant (≤ 6 months), early salvage (7-18 months), or late salvage treatment (> 18 months), respectively. The 3-, 5-, and 10-year progression-free survivals (PFSs) were 52%, 35%, and 25%, respectively. The 3-, 5-, and 10-year disease-specific survivals (DSSs) were 85%, 78%, and 61%, respectively. Adverse radiation events (AREs) were observed in 12 patients (18%), with increased or new seizures being the most frequent complication (n=7). Prior EBRT was associated with reduced PFS (HR = 5.92, P <0.01), reduced DSS (HR = 5.84, P <0.01), and an increased risk of ARE (HR = 3.31, P = 0.04). Timing of SRS was correlated with reduced PFS for patients having early salvage treatment compared to upfront adjuvant (HR = 3.17, P = 0.01) or late salvage treatment (HR = 4.39, P <0.01). ConclusionPFS for patients with residual/recurrent AM remains poor despite SRS. Prior EBRT was associated with worse tumor control, higher tumor-related mortality, and an increased risk of ARE. Further study on the timing of SRS is needed to determine if upfront adjunctive SRS improves tumor control compared to salvage SRS.

Head & Neck ◽  
2021 ◽  
Tseng‐Cheng Chen ◽  
Ta‐Hsuan Lo ◽  
Huai‐Cheng Huang ◽  
Chun‐Wei Wang ◽  
Tsung‐Lin Yang ◽  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. e0256778
Dowook Kim ◽  
Dong-Yun Kim ◽  
Jae-Sung Kim ◽  
Sung Kyu Hong ◽  
Seok-Soo Byun ◽  

Introduction The optimal salvage treatment strategies for lymph node-positive (LNP) patients after radical surgery have not been clearly defined in prostate cancer with biochemical recurrence or persistence of elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA). In this study, we compared the clinical outcomes of two different salvage treatments, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) alone versus ADT with radiotherapy (RT). We also investigated prognostic factors that could support the use of ADT with RT in LNP prostate cancer. Materials and methods We retrospectively reviewed 94 LNP prostate cancer patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) followed by salvage treatment between 2004 and 2018. Salvage treatments involved either ADT alone or ADT with RT according to the clinical judgment of the physician. We analyzed clinicopathological and treatment factors related to 2nd biochemical failure (2nd BCF), clinical progression (CP), and progression-free survival (PFS). The cumulative failure after salvage treatment was defined as including both 2nd BCF and CP. Results The median duration of follow-up was 55 months (interquartile range, 35–97 months). Thirty-seven (39.4%) patients were treated with ADT alone, and 57 patients (60.6%) were treated with a combination of ADT with RT. During follow-up period, the incidence of failure after salvage treatment in the ADT alone group and the combined treatment group was 89.2% and 45.6%, respectively (HR, 22.4; 95% CI 5.43–92.1; P < 0.001). The combination of ADT with RT was associated with better 2nd BCF and PFS than ADT alone (P = 0.007 and P = 0.015, respectively). In multivariate analyses, number of positive LN ≥ 2 and PSA nadir ≥ 0.005 ng/ml after RP were associated with poor 2nd BCF, CP, and PFS after salvage treatment. Salvage by combined ADT plus RT showed better 2nd BCF and PFS than ADT alone. Specifically, patients with number of positive LN ≥ 2 or PSA nadir ≥ 0.005 ng/ml after RP showed better 2nd BCF (P = 0.004) or PFS (P = 0.011) when treated with ADT plus RT rather than ADT alone. Conclusions In patients with LNP prostate cancer, salvage ADT plus RT improved 2nd BCF and PFS compared to ADT alone. In particular, when the patients had more than two positive lymph nodes or PSA nadir ≥ 0.005 ng/ml after RP, ADT with RT seems to be a more beneficial salvage treatment resulting in better 2nd BCF and PFS.

2021 ◽  
Stephen Ahn ◽  
Young Il Kim ◽  
Ja Young Shin ◽  
Jae-Sung Park ◽  
Changyoung Yoo ◽  

Abstract PurposeWhile procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine (PCV) chemotherapy is considered a salvage option for adult glioma, whether vincristine included in this regimen is beneficial is uncertain due to its potential toxicity and uncertain efficacy. In this study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of PC chemotherapy in contrast with those of PCV chemotherapy. MethodsUsing electronic medical records, all patient with adult recurrent glioma who received PC or PCV chemotherapy between 2009 and 2020 at Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital or St. Vincent’s Hospital were examined retrospectively. A total of 59 patients met our eligibility criteria. Among them, 15 patients received PC chemotherapy (PC group) and 44 patients received PCV chemotherapy (PCV group). ResultsThe PC group presented a significantly lower hematology toxicity (anemia: 6.7% vs. 45.5%; p = 0.02 and thrombocytopenia: 20.0% vs. 70.4%; p < 0.001). Also, the clinical impacts of PC chemotherapy, including delay of a cycle, dose reduction, discontinuation of drug(s), or total cessation of chemotherapy, were significantly less frequent (26.7% vs. 68.2%; p = 0.012). The overall survival of PC group was significantly longer than that of PCV group (396 vs. 232 days; p = 0.042), while there was no significant difference in progression-free survival between two groups (284.5 vs. 131 days; p = 0.077). ConclusionThis is the first comparative study to suggest that PC chemotherapy leads to less toxicity than PCV chemotherapy without loss of clinical efficacy in patients with recurrent adult glioma. Further prospective and larger studies are needed to validate our findings. 

Margarida Flor de Lima ◽  
Nuno Nunes ◽  
Carolina Chálim Rebelo ◽  
Diogo Bernardo Moura ◽  
José Renato Pereira ◽  

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (17) ◽  
pp. 4373
Remo Accorona ◽  
Luca Gazzini ◽  
Roberto Grigolato ◽  
Enrico Fazio ◽  
Letizia Nitro ◽  

Introduction: Head and neck bone reconstruction is a challenging surgical scenario. Although several strategies have been described in the literature, bone free flaps (BFFs) have become the preferred technique for large defects. Revascularized free periosteal flaps (FPFs) with support scaffold represents a possible alternative in compromised patient, BFF failure, or relapsing cancers as salvage treatment. However, only few clinical applications in head and neck are reported in literature. Purpose of the study was to systematically analyse the results of functional and oncologic maxillary and mandibular reconstruction with FPF with scaffold. Materials and Methods: A comprehensive review of the dedicated literature was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines searching on Scopus, PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase, Researchgate and Google Scholar databases using relevant keywords, phrases and medical subject headings (MeSH) terms. An excursus on the most valuable FPF’ harvesting sites was also carried out. Results: A total of 7 studies with 55 patients were included. Overall, the majority of the patients (n = 54, 98.1%) underwent an FPF reconstruction of the mandibular site. The most used technique was the radial forearm FPF with autologous frozen bone as scaffold (n = 40, 72.7%). The overall rate of complications was 43.7%. The success rate intended as scaffold integration resulted to be 74.5%. Conclusions: Maxillary and mandibular reconstruction with FPF and scaffold is a possible alternative in patient unfit for complex BFF reconstruction and it should be considered as a valid alternative in the sequential salvage surgery for locally advanced cancer. Moreover, it opens future scenarios in head and neck reconstructive surgery, as a promising tool that can be modelled to tailor complex 3D defects, with less morbidities to the donor site.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document