Faculty Opinions recommendation of Intensive Supportive Care plus Immunosuppression in IgA Nephropathy.

Author(s):  
Kar Neng Lai
Medicine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 99 (24) ◽  
pp. e20513
Author(s):  
Gaiqin Pei ◽  
Jiaxing Tan ◽  
Yi Tang ◽  
Li Tan ◽  
Zhengxia Zhong ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 98 (4) ◽  
pp. 1044-1052 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Rauen ◽  
Stephanie Wied ◽  
Christina Fitzner ◽  
Frank Eitner ◽  
Claudia Sommerer ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vlado Perkovic ◽  
Brad Rovin ◽  
Hong Zhang ◽  
Naoki Kashihara ◽  
Bart Maes ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and Aims IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is the most common primary glomerulonephritis worldwide. It is an autoimmune disease characterized by deposits of IgA1-containing immune complexes in the glomerular mesangium leading to local inflammation and subsequent decline in kidney function. Currently, there are no targeted therapies for IgAN. The KDIGO guidelines (2012) recommend optimized long-term supportive care including inhibition of the RAS (ACEi or ARB) as well as lifestyle modification for blood pressure control and proteinuria reduction. Patients who remain at high risk of progressive CKD despite maximal supportive care might be considered for high-dose corticosteroids or immunosuppressants. In recent years, mounting evidence has supported an important role for complement activation in disease onset and progression of IgAN. The alternative complement pathway (AP) and lectin complement pathway (LP) are found to be activated in 75-90% and 17-25% of IgAN patients, respectively (Floege et al 2014, Maillard et al 2015). Factor B (FB) is an essential component of C3- and C5-convertases. Iptacopan (LNP023) is an oral, first-in-class, highly potent selective inhibitor of FB and thereby blocks the activity of AP C3 and C5 convertases, inhibiting the AP as well as the amplification of the classic and lectin complement pathways. Currently, iptacopan is being evaluated in an ongoing adaptive seamless double-blind and placebo-controlled dose-ranging Phase 2 study (CLNP023X2203, Part 1 and Part 2) in patients with biopsy-confirmed IgAN and elevated proteinuria [urine protein to creatinine ratio (UPCR) ≥ 0.75 g/g]. An interim analysis (IA) at 90 days of treatment in the Part 1 study showed that iptacopan administered up to 200 mg b.i.d for 90 days was safe, well tolerated and may be effective in reducing proteinuria. A further IA combining participants in Part 1 and Part 2 will be completed in early 2021 and the pivotal phase 3 trial is to start in early 2021. Aim APPLAUSE-IgAN (NCT04578834; CLNP023A2301) is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel-group Phase 3 study which aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of iptacopan (LNP023) compared with placebo in addition to supportive therapy on proteinuria reduction and slowing kidney disease progression in primary IgAN patients. Method Adult patients diagnosed with primary IgAN (based on kidney biopsy and elevated proteinuria [UPCR ≥ 1 g/day]) will be recruited. A run-in period will ensure that patients have received ACEi/ARB at a maximally tolerated dose for at least 90 days and receive required vaccinations at least 2 weeks prior to first dosing. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either iptacopan 200 mg b.i.d or matching placebo for a 24-month treatment period. The trial will enroll approximately 450 participants, aiming for 430 with eGFR ≥30 mL /min/1.73m2 (main study population). About 20 participants with eGFR 20 to <30 mL/min/1.73m2 (severe renal impairment population) will also be enrolled to explore PK and safety of iptacopan in this group, but will not be included in the efficacy analyses. Primary objectives 1) At IA (when approximately 250 patients have completed the 9 months visit): To demonstrate superiority of iptacopan vs. placebo in the reduction of proteinuria. The IA results may be submitted to support accelerated/conditional approval. 2) At final analysis (when approximately 430 patients have completed 24 months of active treatment): to demonstrate superiority of iptacopan vs. placebo in slowing kidney disease progression measured by the annualized total slope of eGFR decline over 24 months. Results Recruitment will start in Q1 2021. Conclusion This trial will evaluate the efficacy of iptacopan, a promising new therapy for IgAN, in reducing proteinuria and slowing loss of kidney function over 2 years.


2015 ◽  
Vol 373 (23) ◽  
pp. 2225-2236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Rauen ◽  
Frank Eitner ◽  
Christina Fitzner ◽  
Claudia Sommerer ◽  
Martin Zeier ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel Stefan ◽  
Simona Stancu ◽  
Adrian Dorin Zugravu ◽  
Nicoleta Petre ◽  
Gabriel Mircescu

Abstract Background and Aims The use of immunosuppressive therapy for IgA nephropathy (IgAN) patients with stage 3 or 4 chronic kidney disease (CKD) is controversial. Method We performed a monocentric retrospective study on 83 consecutive IgAN patients (age 41 [33-56] years, 72% male, eGFR 36.1 [25.4-47.5] mL/min) with stage 3 or 4 CKD and proteinuria ≥ 0.75g/day who received uncontrolled supportive care (Supp) (n=36), corticosteroids (CS) (n=14) or CS combined with monthly pulses of cyclophosphamide (CS+CFM) (n=33) between 2010-2017. Patients were followed until composite endpoint (doubling of serum creatinine, ESKD (dialysis or renal transplant) or death, whichever came first) or end of study (May 2018). Results Patients were followed for a median of 29 (95%CI 25.2, 32.7) months, and 12 (15%) patients experienced the composite endpoint. There were no differences between the three studied groups regarding age (Supp 46 [33.5-61.0] vs CS 40 [33-47] vs CS+CFM 41 [34-48] years), eGFR (Supp 37.7 [27.5-49.2] vs CS 40.3 [32.5-54.6] vs CS+CFM 31.5 [22.7-44.3] mL/min), proteinuria (Supp 1.9 [1.4-3.5] vs CS 1.3 [1.0-1.7] vs CS+CFM 1.7 [1.1-2.9] g/g creatinine), MESTC score (Supp 2.5 [1.5-4.0] vs CS 2 [0-2] vs CS+CFM 3 [2-3]), hypertension (Supp 94% vs CS 86% vs CS+CFM 94%) and therapy with renal angiotensin system inhibitors (Supp 83% vs CS 64% vs CS+CFM 67%). Mean renal survival time for the entire cohort was 81.0 (95%CI 73.1, 89.0) months; we found similar renal survival time between the three groups (Supp 79.0 (95%CI 66.5, 91.6) vs CS 69.3 (95%CI 47.7, 91.0) vs CS+CFM 73.7 (95%CI 66.0, 81.4) months, p=0.4). In univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis adjusted for IgAN progression factors, immunosuppressive therapy was not associated with better renal survival when compared to supportive therapy (Table 1). Conclusion Within the limitation of a retrospective study, we found no benefit from immunosuppressive therapy in patients with IgAN with stage 3 and 4 CKD as compared to supportive care.


2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shiren Sun ◽  
Feng Ma ◽  
Xiaoxia Yang ◽  
Ming Bai

Abstract Background and Aims IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is the most type of primary glomerulonephritis and one of the major causes of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The KDIGO clinical practice guidelines for glomerulonephritis suggest not the use of immunosuppressive drugs in IgAN patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≤50 mL/min/1.73m2. However, VALIGA study showed that immunosuppressive drugs were more frequently used in IgAN patients with eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73m2 than in those with eGFR ≥ 30 ml/ min/1.73m2 (60% vs. 44 %; p = 0.004). The immunosuppressive drugs could be effective for IgAN with renal insufficiency in few studies, such as corticosteroids combined oral cyclophosphamide (CS + oral CTX). Therefore, in our present study, we evaluated the efficacy and treatment-related complications of the patients with eGFR from 15 ml/min/1.73m2 to 59 ml/min/1.73m2 who receive supportive care, or CS, or CS + oral CTX. Method 1602 renal biopsy–proven patients were reviewed between January 2008 and December 2016 in the Xijing Hospital. Patients were excluded from the study if they had secondary IgAN. The inclusion criteria were the primary IgAN with eGFR from 15 ml/min/1.73m2 to 59 ml/min/1.73m2 (n = 389). We extracted the patients with receive supportive care, or corticosteroids, or corticosteroids combined oral cyclophosphamide (n = 212). We further excluded patients: < 8 glomeruli (n = 10), diabetes mellitus (n = 4), a follow-up less than 6 months (n = 22), and incomplete data (n = 7). The remaining 169 patients were included in the study (Figure 1). The data included baseline demographic at renal biopsy, renal biopsy, treatment, follow-up parameters and outcomes. The primary endpoint was the combined event of a ≥ 50% reduction in eGFR and/or ESRD. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to determine which variables were associated with renal survival. Variables were entered into a multivariate Cox regression model using an Enter method, which were derived from adjusted models: model 1 was adjusted for age, sex, MAP, proteinuria, and eGFR; model 2 was adjusted for the variables in model 1 plus RAS; model 3 was adjusted for the variables in model 1 plus M1, E1, S1, T1-2, and C1-2; model 4 was adjusted for the variables in model 3 plus RAS. Results In all patients, the mean age was 36.0 years, the median proteinuria at the time of the biopsy was 1.6 g/day, the mean MAP was 108.7 mmHg, and eGFR was 40.4 ml/min/per 1.73 m2, the mean follow-up period was 43.3 months, 75 (44.9%) patients had reached combined event. The cumulative 5-year and 10-year renal survival rate were 39.3% and 9.3%, respectively, in the no-IS group ; 56.5% and 25.1%, respectively, in the CS group and 63.4% and 27.1%, respectively, in the CS + CTX group (Figure 2). Both univariate and multivariate Cox analyses shown that CS did not reduce the risk of combined event, whereas CS + CTX significantly reduced the risk of combined event. CS + CTX (HR = 0.367, 95%CI 0.198-0.682, P = 0.002) was notably associated with the risk of combined event after adjusted for age, sex, MAP, proteinuria, eGFR, M1, E1, S1, T1-2, C1-2, and ARB. The two groups did not differ significantly in treatment-related complications. Conclusion CS + oral CTX is possibly more effective than supportive care, or CS for IgAN patients with eGFR from 15 ml/min/1.73m2 to 59 ml/min/1.73m2. Furthermore, randomized controlled trials further verified the findings of the present study.


2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 317-325 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Rauen ◽  
Christina Fitzner ◽  
Frank Eitner ◽  
Claudia Sommerer ◽  
Martin Zeier ◽  
...  

The role of immunosuppression in IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is controversial. In the Supportive Versus Immunosuppressive Therapy for the Treatment of Progressive IgA Nephropathy (STOP-IgAN) Trial, 162 patients with IgAN and proteinuria >0.75 g/d after 6 months of optimized supportive care were randomized into two groups: continued supportive care or additional immunosuppression (GFR≥60 ml/min per 1.73 m2: 6-month corticosteroid monotherapy; GFR=30–59 ml/min per 1.73 m2: cyclophosphamide for 3 months followed by azathioprine plus oral prednisolone). Coprimary end points were full clinical remission and GFR loss ≥15 ml/min per 1.73 m2 during the 3-year trial phase. In this secondary intention to treat analysis, we separately analyzed data from each immunosuppression subgroup and the corresponding patients on supportive care. Full clinical remission occurred in 11 (20%) patients receiving corticosteroid monotherapy and three (6%) patients on supportive care (odds ratio, 5.31; 95% confidence interval, 1.07 to 26.36; P=0.02), but the rate did not differ between patients receiving immunosuppressive combination and controls on supportive care (11% versus 4%, respectively; P=0.30). The end point of GFR loss ≥15 ml/min per 1.73 m2 did not differ between groups. Only corticosteroid monotherapy transiently reduced proteinuria at 12 months. Severe infections, impaired glucose tolerance, and/or weight gain in the first year were more frequent with either immunosuppressive regimen than with supportive care. In conclusion, only corticosteroid monotherapy induced disease remission in a minority of patients who had IgAN with relatively well preserved GFR and persistent proteinuria. Neither immunosuppressive regimen prevented GFR loss, and both associated with substantial adverse events.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document