11. Transferring Children to Adult Criminal Court

2020 ◽  
pp. 127-136
2019 ◽  
pp. 107-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allison D. Redlich ◽  
Tina Zottoli ◽  
Tarika Daftary-Kapur

As with adult criminal court cases, almost all juvenile and criminal court cases involving youth are resolved by guilty plea. This chapter reviews the extant research on youth defendants and guilty pleas. The focus is on three areas: (1) the circumstances surrounding guilty plea decisions (e.g., access to attorneys, time to make decisions); (2) youths’ knowledge about guilty plea decisions and whether they are made voluntarily; and (3) the rationales underlying guilty plea decisions. Additionally, across these three areas the chapter addresses plea decision-making by guilty and innocent juvenile defendants, highlighting the similarities and differences. The chapter concludes with a call for future research and implications for juveniles involved in the juvenile or adult criminal justice systems.


2008 ◽  
Vol 59 (9) ◽  
pp. 965-973 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason J. Washburn ◽  
Linda A. Teplin ◽  
Laurie S. Voss ◽  
Clarissa D. Simon ◽  
Karen M. Abram ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cynthia J. Najdowski ◽  
Bette L. Bottoms ◽  
Margaret C. Stevenson ◽  
Maria C. Vargas ◽  
Saba Khan

Author(s):  
David O. Brink

There is a moral asymmetry between juvenile and adult offenders if, all else being equal, juveniles should be punished less for their offenses than their adult counterparts should be punished. The trend to transfer juveniles to adult criminal court denies this asymmetry. Developmental and democratic rationales for the asymmetry are distinguished, and the developmental rationale is shown to be more basic. The developmental rationale for the asymmetry is reflected in Supreme Court cases in the United States recognizing constitutional limitations on sentences for juvenile offenders. These cases pose interesting questions about the tension between categorical sentencing rules and individualized justice.


2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 172-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter S. Lehmann ◽  
Ted Chiricos ◽  
William D. Bales

Much prior research has demonstrated that race and ethnicity are associated with harsher punishment outcomes among adult defendants in the criminal court. However, few studies have explored these disparities in the sentencing of juvenile offenders who have been transferred to the adult court, and this research has reported conflicting findings. Moreover, the ways in which offenders’ race and ethnicity may interact with their sex, age, and offense type have yet to be explored among this population. Analysis of defendants sentenced in Florida ( N = 30,913) reveals that Black transferred juveniles are more likely to be sentenced to jail or prison and are given longer prison sentences than Whites, but Hispanic youth are only penalized in the sentence to jail. Interaction analyses suggest that Black males are sentenced particularly harshly regardless of age, and the effects of race and ethnicity are conditioned by a violent, sex, or drug offense.


Criminology ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 725-758 ◽  
Author(s):  
MEGAN C. KURLYCHEK ◽  
BRIAN D. JOHNSON

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document