Designing Modification Routines for Organizational Dynamic Capability Building

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Hyun Lee ◽  
Hong Lee
2016 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 2-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sang M Lee ◽  
Jin Sung Rha

Purpose – Developing ambidexterity as a dynamic capability is important for firms to sustain their competitive advantage. Moreover, this capability allows firms to build the resiliency to mitigate enterprise risks. The purpose of this paper is to apply two main theoretical frames from the strategy literature, dynamic capabilities, and organizational ambidexterity, to supply chain management (SCM) to examine mitigation strategies for supply chain (SC) disruptions. The authors empirically investigated how the firm’s SC ambidexterity is developed through a dynamic capability-building process and how this, in turn, can mitigate the negative impact of SC disruptions and improve business performance. Design/methodology/approach – This study conducted a field survey to answer the research questions as there exists no archival database with detailed information on ambidextrous SC strategies and dynamic capability. A total of 316 usable responses were received from managers working in the SC area. Confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling were run on SPSS (version 16.0) and AMOS (version 18.0) to test the hypotheses to answer research questions. Findings – Overall, the results of the study confirmed that a dynamic SC capability-building process is an antecedent of SC ambidexterity, and that SC ambidexterity is important to firms as it mitigate the negative impact of SC disruptions and enhance business performance. To take advantage of an ambidextrous SC, through minimizing the negative impact of SC disruptions and maximizing firm performance, firms should continually search for creative ways to satisfy new market needs and adapt to the fast changing business environment. Originality/value – This study applied a dynamic capability-building process and ambidexterity to SCM. From the resilient SC perspective, the study found that the ability to effectively utilize existing resources and create novel strategies for problem solving plays a critical role in addressing SC disruptions.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (1) ◽  
pp. 13437
Author(s):  
Sihem Ben Mahmoud-Jouini ◽  
Julie SAHAKIAN

2020 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 53-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeanne Liedtka

Design thinking can be a critical facilitator of new technologies, but it is also a technology in its own right—a social technology that encourages more productive innovation conversations that are strategically valuable for dynamic capability building. By overcoming social and psychological barriers in innovation processes, design thinking accelerates progress on critical imperatives: allowing innovators at all levels to sense new opportunities; seize them by overcoming cognitive biases and aligning stakeholders; and transform and reconfigure resources. It accomplishes this through a set of well-recognized practices.


2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (05) ◽  
pp. 1750027
Author(s):  
Alireza Javanmardi Kashan ◽  
Kavoos Mohannak

This paper investigates the interrelationships between knowledge integration (KI), product innovation and capability development to enhance our understanding of the processes and outcomes of capability development within firms. One of the critical underlying mechanisms for capability building identified in the literature is the role of knowledge integration, which operates within innovation projects and contributes to dynamic capability development. Findings of this study demonstrate that the emergence of knowledge specialization from the part level up to the architectural level lead to emergence of innovation ecosystem within the auto industry as a response to learning and innovation within the firm.


2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 93-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carole Donada ◽  
Gwenaelle Nogatchewsky ◽  
Anne Pezet

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document