scholarly journals Patterns of practice in the prescription of palliative radiotherapy for the treatment of bone metastases at the Rapid Response Radiotherapy Program between 2005 and 2012

2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 396 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Thavarajah ◽  
L. Zhang ◽  
K. Wong ◽  
G. Bedard ◽  
E. Wong ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 83 (1) ◽  
pp. e117-e120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naoki Nakamura ◽  
Naoto Shikama ◽  
Hitoshi Wada ◽  
Hideyuki Harada ◽  
Miwako Nozaki ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 111 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marko Popovic ◽  
Mariska den Hartogh ◽  
Liying Zhang ◽  
Michael Poon ◽  
Henry Lam ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 75 (5) ◽  
pp. 1501-1510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alysa Fairchild ◽  
Elizabeth Barnes ◽  
Sunita Ghosh ◽  
Edgar Ben-Josef ◽  
Daniel Roos ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 81 (2) ◽  
pp. S654-S655 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Nakamura ◽  
N. Shikama ◽  
H. Wada ◽  
H. Harada ◽  
M. Nozaki ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (02) ◽  
pp. 116-122
Author(s):  
Nida Khan ◽  
David Green

AbstractBackgroundThere is abundant evidence of the comparative efficacy of single-fraction (SF) radiotherapy and multi-fraction (MF) radiotherapy when treating patients with bone metastases. Despite this, previous surveys have shown SF schedules to be underutilised.AimTo determine current patterns of practice in patients with bone metastasis and to investigate the factors that influence practice.MethodAn electronic audit was performed amongst 46 physicians, within 7 hospital trusts in the UK. The audit comprised of four hypothetical cases in which consultants and registrars chose which dose and fractionation they would recommend and their reasons for this recommendation.ResultsSF radiotherapy was the most common radiotherapy schedule in hypothetical cases 1, 3 and 4. SF radiotherapy was recommended by 65% of respondents in case 1, 47% in case 2, 89% in case 3 and 46% in case 4. For case 2, 50% proposed MF radiotherapy. For case 4, 22% of respondents recommended Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SABR). The following deciding factors were cited as influencing choice of an SF schedule: prognosis, published evidence, performance status and spinal cord compression.ConclusionThe most common radiotherapy schedule selected was SF. However, there were inter-institution differences regarding the use of SF radiotherapy. Furthermore, the survey had shown that a third of respondents recommended an MF regime, despite evidence supporting the efficacy of an SF schedule.


2006 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 373-385 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole M. E. Bradley ◽  
Janice Husted ◽  
Michael Sai Lai Sey ◽  
Amna F. Husain ◽  
Emily Sinclair ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document