scholarly journals The effect of lever retraction on resistance to extinction of a response rewarded with electrical stimulation of the brain

1968 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald Gandelman ◽  
Jaak Panksepp ◽  
Jay Trowill
1965 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 909-913 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger W. McIntire ◽  
James E. Wright

Rats were trained to bar-press for electrical stimulation of the brain (ESB) or H2O reinforcement in order to examine differences in resistance to extinction as related to method of presentation of reward. The methods of presentation of ESB were: (1) immediate with the appropriate bar-press, (2) immediate with the appropriate bar-press with addition of a momentarily presented dry water cup, (3) immediate with the licking of the water cup presented on appropriate bar-press. Also, a group working for one lick of water and no ESB was included. The data show clearly that H2O reinforcement is superior in producing higher resistance to extinction and that presentation of ESB reinforcement in a manner similar to the way in which a water reinforcement is presented gives higher resistance to extinction than presenting ESB reinforcement contingent only on the bar-press.


1989 ◽  
Vol 257 (1) ◽  
pp. G24-G29
Author(s):  
W. D. Barber ◽  
C. S. Yuan

The brain stem neuronal responses to electrical stimulation of gastric branches of the ventral vagal trunk serving the proximal stomach were localized and evaluated in anesthetized cats. The responses were equally distributed bilaterally in the region of nucleus solitarius in the caudal brain stem. The mean latency of the response was 289 +/- 46 (SD) ms, which translated into a conduction velocity of less than 1 m/s based on the distance between the stimulating and recording electrodes. The responses consisted of single and multiple spikes that showed slight variability in the latency, indicating orthodromic activation via a synapse in approximately 98% of the responses recorded. Forty two percent of the units tested showed evidence of convergence of input from vagal afferent fibers in different branches of the ventral vagal trunk that served the proximal stomach. The resultant activity pattern of the unitary response appeared to be the product of 1) the gastric sensory input or modality conveyed by the afferent source and 2) the time of arrival and diversity of modalities served by other gastric afferents impinging on the unit. This provides a mechanism capable of responding on the basis of specific sensory modalities that dynamically reflect ongoing events monitored and conveyed by other gastric afferents in the region.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document