scholarly journals A response instruction by visual-field interaction: S-R compatibility effect or?

1977 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 475-477 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bill Cotton ◽  
Ovid J. L. Tzeng ◽  
Curtis Hardyck
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Compatibility Effect ◽  
Field Interaction ◽  
Response Instruction

scholarly journals Ear by Visual-Field Interaction on a Cross-Modal Syllable-Matching Task

Cortex ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 297-304
Author(s):  
Paul Broks
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Matching Task ◽  
Field Interaction

scholarly journals Is there a lower visual field preference in object affordances? A registered report.

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annie Warman ◽  
Stephanie Rossit ◽  
George Law Malcolm ◽  
Allan Clark
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Compatibility Effect ◽  
Visual Processing ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Reaction Times ◽  
Object Identification ◽  
Spatial Compatibility ◽  
Lower Visual Field ◽  
Reach To Grasp ◽  
Stimulus Response

It’s been repeatedly shown that pictures of graspable objects can facilitate visual processing and motor responses, even in the absence of reach-to-grasp actions, an effect often attributed the concept of affordances, originally introduced by Gibson (1979). A classic demonstration of this is the handle compatibility effect, which is characterised by faster reaction times when the orientation of a graspable object’s handle is compatible with the hand used to respond, even when the handle orientation is task irrelevant. Nevertheless, whether faster RTs are due to affordances or spatial compatibility effects has been significantly debated. In the proposed studies, we will use a stimulus-response compatibility paradigm to investigate firstly, whether we can replicate the handle compatibility effect while controlling for spatial compatibility. Here, participants will respond with left- or right-handed keypresses to whether the object is upright or inverted and, in separate blocks, whether the object is red or green. RTs will be analysed using repeated-measures ANOVAs. In line with an affordance account, we hypothesise that there will be larger handle compatibility effects for upright/inverted compared to colour judgements, as colour judgements do not require object identification and are not thought to elicit affordances. Secondly, we will investigate whether the handle compatibility effect shows a lower visual field (VF) advantage in line with functional lower VF advantages observed for hand actions. We expect larger handle compatibility effects for objects viewed in the lower VF than upper VF, given that the lower VF is the space where actions most frequently occur.

Abstract #815: Visual Field Deterioration While on Medical Treatment in a Patient with Giant Prolactinoma

2017 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. 169-170
Author(s):  
Joyce George ◽  
Betul Hatipoglu
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Medical Treatment ◽  
Giant Prolactinoma

Empty visual field studies: Some effects of corrective lenses, filters, and structure.

1964 ◽  
Author(s):  
Milton S. Katz ◽  
Paul A. Cirincione ◽  
William Metlay
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Field Studies

The Role of Phonology in the Unit-Decade Compatibility Effect

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pedro Macizo ◽  
Amparo Herrera
Keyword(s):  
Compatibility Effect

Left visual field advantage for object recognition during rapid serial presentation

1997 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara J. Knowlton ◽  
Sean P. McAullffe
Keyword(s):  
Object Recognition ◽  
Visual Field ◽  
Left Visual Field

A review of the effect of menstruation on accident involvement, size of visual field, and color perception

1974 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryne M. Lanfair ◽  
Leo A. Smith
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Color Perception

Attractiveness vs. Status Contrast: An Eye-Tracking and Divided Visual Field Study

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emine Akman ◽  
Seda Dural
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Eye Tracking ◽  
Field Study ◽  
Divided Visual Field
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document