scholarly journals Absence of attentional capture in parallel search is possible: A failure to replicate attentional capture in a non-singleton target search task

2011 ◽  
Vol 73 (7) ◽  
pp. 2044-2052 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolin Wienrich ◽  
Markus Janczyk
Perception ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 25 (7) ◽  
pp. 861-874 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rick Gurnsey ◽  
Frédéric J A M Poirier ◽  
Eric Gascon

Davis and Driver presented evidence suggesting that Kanizsa-type subjective contours could be detected in a visual search task in a time that is independent of the number of nonsubjective contour distractors. A linking connection was made between these psychophysical data and the physiological data of Peterhans and von der Heydt which showed that cells in primate area V2 respond to subjective contours in the same way that they respond to luminance-defined contours. Here in three experiments it is shown that there was sufficient information in the displays used by Davis and Driver to support parallel search independently of whether subjective contours were present or not. When confounding properties of the stimuli were eliminated search became slow whether or not subjective contours were present in the display. One of the slowest search conditions involved stimuli that were virtually identical to those used in the physiological studies of Peterhans and von der Heydt to which Davis and Driver wish to link their data. It is concluded that while subjective contours may be represented in the responses of very early visual mechanisms (eg in V2) access to these representations is impaired by high-contrast contours used to induce the subjective contours and nonsubjective figure distractors. This persistent control problem continues to confound attempts to show that Kanizsa-type subjective contours can be detected in parallel.


Author(s):  
Dirk van Moorselaar ◽  
Jan Theeuwes

AbstractIncreasing evidence demonstrates that observers can learn the likely location of salient singleton distractors during visual search. To date, the reduced attentional capture at high-probability distractor locations has typically been examined using so called compound search, in which by design a target is always present. Here, we explored whether statistical distractor learning can also be observed in a visual detection task, in which participants respond target present if the singleton target is present and respond target absent when the singleton target is absent. If so, this allows us to examine suppression of the location that is likely to contain a distractor both in the presence, but critically also in the absence, of a priority signal generated by the target singleton. In an online variant of the additional singleton paradigm, observers had to indicate whether a unique shape was present or absent, while ignoring a colored singleton, which appeared with a higher probability in one specific location. We show that attentional capture was reduced, but not absent, at high-probability distractor locations, irrespective of whether the display contained a target or not. By contrast, target processing at the high-probability distractor location was selectively impaired on distractor-present displays. Moreover, all suppressive effects were characterized by a gradient such that suppression scaled with the distance to the high-probability distractor location. We conclude that statistical distractor learning can be examined in visual detection tasks, and discuss the implications for attentional suppression due to statistical learning.


2015 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 559-564 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesc Llorens ◽  
Daniel Sanabria ◽  
Florentino Huertas ◽  
Enrique Molina ◽  
Simon Bennett

The abrupt onset of a visual stimulus typically results in overt attentional capture, which can be quantified by saccadic eye movements. Here, we tested whether attentional capture following onset of task-irrelevant visual stimuli (new object) is reduced after a bout of intense physical exercise. A group of participants performed a visual search task in two different activity conditions: rest, without any prior effort, and effort, immediately after an acute bout of intense exercise. The results showed that participants exhibited (1) slower reaction time of the first saccade toward the target when a new object was simultaneously presented in the visual field, but only in the rest activity condition, and (2) more saccades to the new object in the rest activity condition than in the effort activity condition. We suggest that immediately after an acute bout of effort, participants improved their ability to inhibit irrelevant (distracting) stimuli.


1989 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 372-385 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mirjam Eglin ◽  
Lynn C. Robertson ◽  
Robert T. Knight

Patients with hemispatial neglect fail to respond to stimuli on one side of space. We assessed to what extent the complexity and number of visual stimuli on both sides determine the severity of neglect. Patients with neglect were required to find specified targets in a cluttered visual field. Two sets of stimuli were used. One set produced effortless and parallel search performance in normal controls; the other set was more complex and produced serial search performance in normal controls. Both sets of stimuli resulted in a serial performance pattern in the patients. Their baseline search performance on both sides was similar when all stimulus items were restricted to one side. A pronounced difference between the two sides was evident when stimuli appeared on both sides. Search for targets on the intact side of space was unaffected by distractors on the neglected side, whereas search for targets on the neglected side was slowed disproportionately by distractors on the intact side. The slowing on the neglected side was more severe during the more demanding search task and when more items were present on the intact side. The results indicate that neglect is associated with an inability to move attention from objects on the intact side to items on the neglected side.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document