scholarly journals Biportal endoscopic decompression vs. microscopic decompression for lumbar canal stenosis: A systematic review and meta‑analysis

Author(s):  
Tiewu Chen ◽  
Guoqing Zhou ◽  
Zhineng Chen ◽  
Xinmiao Yao ◽  
Dan Liu
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 438-446
Author(s):  
Jwo-Luen Pao ◽  
Shang-Ming Lin ◽  
Wen-Chi Chen ◽  
Chih-Hung Chang

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 238
Author(s):  
Sanyam Jain ◽  
Vishal Kundnani ◽  
Neilakou Kire ◽  
ZahirA Merchant ◽  
Jwalant Patel

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 127-137
Author(s):  
S. V. Kolesov ◽  
L. K. Mikhaylova ◽  
D. A. Kolbovsky ◽  
V. S. Pereverzev

A multidisciplinary approach to treatment of patients with mucopolysaccharidosis allows to achieve good results. However, progressive spinal canal stenosis at the level of the craniovertebral junction, characteristic of this disease, leads to neurological signs, as well as a decrease in quality and length of life. The solution to this problem is a difficult challenge for spinal surgeons, as it is associated with a high risk of complications. There is also a wide range of opinions and approaches to the surgical treatment of this group of patients.Using the referred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis» (PRISMA) protocol, a PubMed and eLIBRARY search was conducted using keywords to find articles describing patients with mucopolysaccharidosis who underwent surgical treatment for cervical stenosis. In this review, information on demographic parameters, surgical technique and the results of cervical stenosis treatment in patients with mucopolysaccharidosis is collected and analyzed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document