China A-Shares: Strategic Allocation to Market and Factor Premiums

2021 ◽  
pp. jpm.2021.1.245
Author(s):  
Wilma de Groot ◽  
Laurens Swinkels ◽  
Weili Zhou
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
B W Weston ◽  
Z N Swingen ◽  
S Gramann ◽  
D Pojar

Abstract Background To describe the Strategic Allocation of Fundamental Epidemic Resources (SAFER) model as a method to inform equitable community distribution of critical resources and testing infrastructure. Methods The SAFER model incorporates a four-quadrant design to categorize a given community based on two scales: testing rate and positivity rate. Three models for stratifying testing rates and positivity rates were applied to census tracts in Milwaukee County, Wisconsin: using median values (MVs), cluster-based classification and goal-oriented values (GVs). Results Each of the three approaches had its strengths. MV stratification divided the categories most evenly across geography, aiding in assessing resource distribution in a fixed resource and testing capacity environment. The cluster-based stratification resulted in a less broad distribution but likely provides a truer distribution of communities. The GVs grouping displayed the least variation across communities, yet best highlighted our areas of need. Conclusions The SAFER model allowed the distribution of census tracts into categories to aid in informing resource and testing allocation. The MV stratification was found to be of most utility in our community for near real time resource allocation based on even distribution of census tracts. The GVs approach was found to better demonstrate areas of need.


2021 ◽  
pp. jpm.2021.1.235
Author(s):  
Redouane Elkamhi ◽  
Jacky S.H. Lee ◽  
Sheikh Sadik

2015 ◽  
Vol 35 ◽  
pp. 282-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabella Fuchs ◽  
Ulrich Ansorge ◽  
Christoph Huber-Huber ◽  
Anna Höflich ◽  
Rupert Lanzenberger
Keyword(s):  

2012 ◽  
Vol 24 (9) ◽  
pp. 1834-1848 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Gregory Appelbaum ◽  
Carsten N. Boehler ◽  
Robert Won ◽  
Lauren Davis ◽  
Marty G. Woldorff

Humans are able to continuously monitor environmental situations and adjust their behavioral strategies to optimize performance. Here we investigate the behavioral and brain adjustments that occur when conflicting stimulus elements are, or are not, temporally predictable. ERPs were collected while manual response variants of the Stroop task were performed in which the SOAs between the relevant color and irrelevant word stimulus components were either randomly intermixed or held constant within each experimental run. Results indicated that the size of both the neural and behavioral effects of stimulus incongruency varied with the temporal arrangement of the stimulus components, such that the random-SOA arrangements produced the greatest incongruency effects at the earliest irrelevant first SOA (−200 msec) and the constant-SOA arrangements produced the greatest effects with simultaneous presentation. These differences in conflict processing were accompanied by rapid (∼150 msec) modulations of the sensory ERPs to the irrelevant distractor components when they occurred consistently first. These effects suggest that individuals are able to strategically allocate attention in time to mitigate the influence of a temporally predictable distractor. As these adjustments are instantiated by the participants without instruction, they reveal a form of rapid strategic learning for dealing with temporally predictable stimulus incongruency.


2019 ◽  
Vol 127 ◽  
pp. 160-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hamed Zamani Sabzi ◽  
Shabnam Rezapour ◽  
Rachel Fovargue ◽  
Hernan Moreno ◽  
Thomas M. Neeson

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel D. Andrino ◽  
Ricardo P. C. Leal
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document