scholarly journals COMPARATIVE STUDIES ON SEGMENTAL GASTRECTOMY WITH OR WITHOUT VAGOTOMY FOR HIGH GASTRIC ULCER IN VIEW OF LATE POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS

1986 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 153-160
Author(s):  
Yasuhiro HIRAI ◽  
Tomoaki URAKAWA ◽  
Yoshi NAGAHATA ◽  
Mitsuharu NAKAMOTO ◽  
Shoji MATSUI ◽  
...  
1947 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 231-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralph Colp ◽  
Leonard J. Druckerman

1987 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 325-332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans-Eric Jensen ◽  
Jack Hoffmann ◽  
Peer Wille-Jørgensen

BMC Urology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hao Yang ◽  
Xiao-xiao Xuan ◽  
Dong-lai Hu ◽  
Hang Zhang ◽  
Qiang Shu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Tubularized incised plate (TIP) urethroplasty is the most commonly performed procedure for hypospadias. Several flap procedures have been recommended to decrease the postoperative complication rate in TIP repair, but no single flap procedure is ideal. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of dartos fascia (DF) and tunica vaginalis fascia (TVF) as intermediate layers in TIP urethroplasty. Methods We searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, clinicaltrials.gov, and other sources for comparative studies up to April 16, 2020. Studies were selected by the predesigned inclusion criteria. The primary outcomes were postoperative complications. The secondary outcomes were functional and cosmetic outcomes. Results The pooled RR with 95% CI were calculated. We extracted the relevant information from the included studies. Only 6 comparative studies were included. No secondary outcomes were reported. The RR of the total complications rate for DF was 2.41 (95% CI 1.42–4.07, P = 0.0001) compared with TVF in TIP repair. For each postoperative complication, the RRs were 6.48 (2.20–19.12, P = 0.0007), 5.95 (1.13–31.30, P = 0.04), 0.62 (0.25–1.52, P = 0.29), and 0.75 (0.23–2.46, P = 0.64) for urethrocutaneous fistula, prepuce-related complications, meatal/urethral stenosis, and wound-related complications, respectively. Conclusions This meta-analysis reveals that compared to DF, TVF is a better option in TIP repair in terms of decreasing the incidence of the total postoperative complications, urethrocutaneous fistula, and prepuce-related complications. However there is limited evidence for functional and cosmetic outcomes. Overall, larger prospective studies and long-term follow-up data are required to further demonstrate the superiority of TVF over DF. Trial registration PROSPERO CRD42019148554.


1950 ◽  
Vol 79 (3) ◽  
pp. 457
Author(s):  
Lyon H. Appleby

1985 ◽  
Vol 149 (6) ◽  
pp. 765-770 ◽  
Author(s):  
Attlla Csendes ◽  
Italo Braghettto ◽  
Francisco Calvo ◽  
Ronald De La Cuadra ◽  
Nicolas Velasco ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 112070002199146
Author(s):  
Malte Ohlmeier ◽  
Insa Jachczik ◽  
Mustafa Citak ◽  
Thorsten Gehrke ◽  
Nael Hawi ◽  
...  

Introduction: This study was undertaken to analyse the outcome of 1-stage exchange in the management of streptococcal periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the hip at a single hospital. Methods: We identified 30 patients with a streptococcal PJI of the hip who had been treated by 1-stage exchange at our hospital between 2002 and 2017. Postoperative complications and the need for any subsequent re-revision for infection or other reasons were analysed. The Harris Hip Score (HHS) was evaluated at final follow-up. Results: The mean follow-up was 8.2 years (SD 4.1). The overall re-revision rate for any reason was 53% (16/30) at a mean 5.3 years (SD 0.68 years). Re-revision for infection was 20% (6/30) at a mean 1.8 years (SD 0.74 years). All re-revisions for PJI (6/6; 100%) were for relapse of the streptococcal infection. At final follow-up, the mean HHS was 68 points (SD 20). Conclusions: The rate of re-revision after 1-stage exchange for streptococcal PJI is high. Eradication of a streptococcal PJI of the hip remains challenging. Further extensive and comparative studies between 1-and 2-stage exchange are encouraged.


1984 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 263-271
Author(s):  
Shuji KAGAWA ◽  
Tomoaki URAKAWA ◽  
Yasuo NAKAYAMA ◽  
Takayoshi TAKATA ◽  
Hiroyuki DEGUCHI ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document