Comparison of Range of Motion of High-Flexion Prosthesis and Mobile-Bearing Prosthesis in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Orthopedics ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 28 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jong Keun Seon ◽  
Eun Kyoo Song ◽  
Jun Yub Lee
2021 ◽  
pp. 42-44
Author(s):  
Amol K Salve ◽  
Vinod Kumar Yadav ◽  
Ajay M Wankhade ◽  
Tanay Nahatkar ◽  
Sangam Jain

Intro- For TKA, there are two types of bearing designs: xed-bearing and mobile-bearing. Round femoral components articulate with a relatively at tibial articular surface in a xed-bearing knee design. Because the insert does not hinder the natural movements of the femoral component, the mobile-bearing (MB) TKA design is thought to allow more exibility of motion than the xed-bearing (FB) variety. Aim and objective: To compare xed bearing and mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty. Material and methods:This study is a prospective type of study done at Seth GS medical college Mumbai, Department of Orthopaedics during August 2019 to June 2021 on patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Patients who were to undergo total knee arthroplasty were invited to take part in the study. This study, done on them was explained in detail to them. An informed consent was obtained. Patients fullling the inclusion criteria were listed. Result: Range of motion achieved after mobile arthroplasty was 123.62±2.94 and in xed arthroplasty it was 121.96±2.74. Pain after last follow up in mobile arthroplasty was 48.83±0.62 and for xed arthroplasty was 47.39±0.86. Flexion gap after last follow up in mobile arthroplasty was 24.13±0.45 and in xed was 24.02±0.45. Stability was almost similar in both mobile and xed arthroplasty. Conclusions: there is no signicant difference between xed arthroplasty and mobile arthroplasty as far as Range of motion, Pain ,Flexion gap. Stability was almost similar in both mobile and xed arthroplasty.


2004 ◽  
Vol 86 (10) ◽  
pp. 2257-2262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Aigner ◽  
Reinhard Windhager ◽  
Michael Pechmann ◽  
Peter Rehak ◽  
Klaus Engeleke

2009 ◽  
Vol 91 (3) ◽  
pp. 672-679 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jong Keun Seon ◽  
Sang Jin Park ◽  
Keun Bae Lee ◽  
Taek Rim Yoon ◽  
Michal Kozanek ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 19 (12) ◽  
pp. 2016-2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jong-Keun Seon ◽  
Ju-Kwon Park ◽  
Young-Joo Shin ◽  
Hyung-Yeon Seo ◽  
Keun-Bae Lee ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 179-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Attique Vasdev ◽  
Satish Kumar ◽  
Gaggan Chadha ◽  
Shyama Prasad Mandal

Purpose. To compare the mid-term clinical outcomes in Indian patients after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using a fixed- or mobile-bearing prosthesis. Methods. 120 consecutive patients (50 men and 70 women) aged 55 to 76 (mean, 63) years who had arthritis of the knee with similar deformity and range of motion were randomised to undergo TKA using a fixed- or mobile-bearing prosthesis. Patients with mediolateral instability and infective arthritis were excluded. Knee Society knee and functional scores, range of motion, and the presence of flexion contracture were assessed. Results. The mean follow-up duration was 3.5 (range, 1–4.6) years. The mid-term outcome of the 2 groups was comparable. One patient with a mobile-bearing prosthesis had recurrent dislocation at postoperative week 2, owing to iatrogenic medial collateral ligament injury. Conclusion. Long-term studies of both functional and radiological outcomes are needed to determine the indications for fixed- versus mobile-bearing prostheses.


The Knee ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. 183-189
Author(s):  
Tomofumi Kage ◽  
Hiroshi Inui ◽  
Tetsuya Tomita ◽  
Takaharu Yamazaki ◽  
Shuji Taketomi ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 19 (12) ◽  
pp. 2002-2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshinori Ishii ◽  
Hideo Noguchi ◽  
Mitsuhiro Takeda ◽  
Junko Sato ◽  
Shin-ichi Toyabe

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document