scholarly journals Divisibility of Fibonomial coefficients in terms of their digital representations and applications

2022 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 5314-5327
Author(s):  
Phakhinkon Napp Phunphayap ◽  
◽  
Prapanpong Pongsriiam

<abstract><p>We give a characterization for the integers $ n \geq 1 $ such that the Fibonomial coefficient $ {pn \choose n}_F $ is divisible by $ p $ for any prime $ p \neq 2, 5 $. Then we use it to calculate asymptotic formulas for the number of positive integers $ n \leq x $ such that $ p \mid {pn \choose n}_F $. This completes the study on this problem for all primes $ p $.</p></abstract>

2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (02) ◽  
pp. 363-374 ◽  
Author(s):  
WERNER GEORG NOWAK ◽  
LÁSZLÓ TÓTH

Let ℤm be the group of residue classes modulo m. Let s(m, n) denote the total number of subgroups of the group ℤm × ℤn, where m and n are arbitrary positive integers. We derive asymptotic formulas for the sum ∑m,n≤x s(m, n) and for the corresponding sum restricted to gcd (m, n) > 1 which concerns the groups ℤm × ℤn having rank two.


2021 ◽  
Vol 76 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Randell Heyman ◽  
László Tóth

AbstractWe obtain asymptotic formulas with remainder terms for the hyperbolic summations $$\sum _{mn\le x} f((m,n))$$ ∑ m n ≤ x f ( ( m , n ) ) and $$\sum _{mn\le x} f([m,n])$$ ∑ m n ≤ x f ( [ m , n ] ) , where f belongs to certain classes of arithmetic functions, (m, n) and [m, n] denoting the gcd and lcm of the integers m, n. In particular, we investigate the functions $$f(n)=\tau (n), \log n, \omega (n)$$ f ( n ) = τ ( n ) , log n , ω ( n ) and $$\Omega (n)$$ Ω ( n ) . We also define a common generalization of the latter three functions, and prove a corresponding result.


2021 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-54
Author(s):  
Reza Farhadian ◽  
Rafael Jakimczuk

Abstract The aim of this note is to study the distribution function of certain sequences of positive integers, including, for example, Bell numbers, factorials and primorials. In fact, we establish some general asymptotic formulas in this regard. We also prove some limits that connect these sequences with the number e. Furthermore, we present a generalization of the primorial.


2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. 2699-2728 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isao Kiuchi ◽  
Sumaia Saad eddin

Let [Formula: see text] be the greatest common divisor of the integers [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]. In this paper, we give several interesting asymptotic formulas for weighted averages of the [Formula: see text]-sum function [Formula: see text] and the function [Formula: see text] for any positive integers [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], namely [Formula: see text] with any fixed integer [Formula: see text] and any arithmetical function [Formula: see text]. We also establish mean value formulas for the error terms of asymptotic formulas for partial sums of [Formula: see text]-sum functions [Formula: see text]


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Barner

Perceptual representations – e.g., of objects or approximate magnitudes –are often invoked as building blocks that children combine with linguisticsymbols when they acquire the positive integers. Systems of numericalperception are either assumed to contain the logical foundations ofarithmetic innately, or to supply the basis for their induction. Here Ipropose an alternative to this general framework, and argue that theintegers are not learned from perceptual systems, but instead arise toexplain perception as part of language acquisition. Drawing oncross-linguistic data and developmental data, I show that small numbers(1-4) and large numbers (~5+) arise both historically and in individualchildren via entirely distinct mechanisms, constituting independentlearning problems, neither of which begins with perceptual building blocks.Specifically, I propose that children begin by learning small numbers(i.e., *one, two, three*) using the same logical resources that supportother linguistic markers of number (e.g., singular, plural). Several yearslater, children discover the logic of counting by inferring the logicalrelations between larger number words from their roles in blind countingprocedures, and only incidentally associate number words with perception ofapproximate magnitudes, in an *ad hoc* and highly malleable fashion.Counting provides a form of explanation for perception but is not causallyderived from perceptual systems.


10.37236/1729 ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Graham Denham

Let $a_1,\ldots,a_n$ be distinct, positive integers with $(a_1,\ldots,a_n)=1$, and let k be an arbitrary field. Let $H(a_1,\ldots,a_n;z)$ denote the Hilbert series of the graded algebra k$[t^{a_1},t^{a_2},\ldots,t^{a_n}]$. We show that, when $n=3$, this rational function has a simple expression in terms of $a_1,a_2,a_3$; in particular, the numerator has at most six terms. By way of contrast, it is known that no such expression exists for any $n\geq4$.


10.37236/1735 ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dhruv Mubayi ◽  
Yi Zhao

Given positive integers $n,k,t$, with $2 \le k\le n$, and $t < 2^k$, let $m(n,k,t)$ be the minimum size of a family ${\cal F}$ of nonempty subsets of $[n]$ such that every $k$-set in $[n]$ contains at least $t$ sets from ${\cal F}$, and every $(k-1)$-set in $[n]$ contains at most $t-1$ sets from ${\cal F}$. Sloan et al. determined $m(n, 3, 2)$ and Füredi et al. studied $m(n, 4, t)$ for $t=2, 3$. We consider $m(n, 3, t)$ and $m(n, 4, t)$ for all the remaining values of $t$ and obtain their exact values except for $k=4$ and $t= 6, 7, 11, 12$. For example, we prove that $ m(n, 4, 5) = {n \choose 2}-17$ for $n\ge 160$. The values of $m(n, 4, t)$ for $t=7,11,12$ are determined in terms of well-known (and open) Turán problems for graphs and hypergraphs. We also obtain bounds of $m(n, 4, 6)$ that differ by absolute constants.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document