scholarly journals The Relative Abundance of Invasive House Sparrows (Passer domesticus) in an Urban Environment in South Africa is Determined by Land Use

2015 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 354-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kholosa Magudu ◽  
Colleen T. Downs
Ostrich ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 91 (3) ◽  
pp. 252-259
Author(s):  
Cavin T Shivambu ◽  
Ndivhuwo Shivambu ◽  
Takalani Nelufule ◽  
Moleseng C Moshobane ◽  
Manqoba M Zungu ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Antonio Brun ◽  
Melisa E. Magallanes ◽  
Gregory A. Barrett-Wilt ◽  
William H. Karasov ◽  
Enrique Caviedes-Vidal

Dietary flexibility in digestive enzyme activity is widespread in vertebrates, but mechanisms are poorly understood. When laboratory rats are switched to higher carbohydrate diet, activity of intestinal sucrase-isomaltase (SI) increases within 6-12 h, mainly by rapid increase in enzyme transcription followed by rapid translation and translocation to the intestine's apical, brush border membrane (BBM). We performed the first unified study of the overall process in birds, relying on activity, proteomic and transcriptomic data from nestling house sparrows (Passer domesticus). They switch naturally from low-starch insect diet to higher-starch seed diet, and SI is responsible for all their intestinal maltase and sucrase activities. Twenty-four hours after a switch to a high-starch diet, SI activity was increased, but not at 12 h post-diet switch. SI was the only hydrolase increased in the BBM, and its relative abundance and activity were positively correlated. Twenty-four hours after a reverse switch back to the lower-starch diet, SI activity was decreased, but not at 12 h post-diet switch. Parallel changes in SI mRNA were associated with the changes in SI activity in both diet switch experiments. This is the first demonstration that birds may rely on rapid increase in abundance of SI and its mRNA when adjusting to high starch diet. Although the mechanisms underlying dietary induction of intestinal enzymes seem similar in nestling house sparrows and laboratory rodents, time course for modulation in nestlings seemed half as fast compared to laboratory rodents. This may be understandable considering differences in ecology and evolution.


2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeannie Van Wyk

Our spatial environment is one of the most important determinants of our well-being and life chances. It relates to schools, opportunities, businesses, recreation and access to public services. Spatial injustice results where discrimination determines that spatial environment. Since Apartheid in South Africa epitomised the notion of spatial injustice, tools and instruments are required to transform spatial injustice into spatial justice. One of these is the employment of principles of spatial justice. While the National Development Plan (NDP) recognised that all spatial development should conform to certain normative principles and should explicitly indicate how the requirements of these should be met, the Spatial Planning and Land Use Management Act 16 of 2013 (SPLUMA) contains a more concrete principle of spatial justice. It echoes aspects of both the South African land reform programme and global principles of spatial justice. Essentially section 7(a) of SPLUMA entails three components: (1) redressing past spatial imbalances and exclusions; (2) including people and areas previously excluded and (3) upgrading informal areas and settlements. SPLUMA directs municipalities to apply the principle in its spatial development frameworks, land use schemes and, most importantly, in decision-making on development applications. The aim of this article is to determine whether the application of this principle in practice can move beyond the confines of spatial planning and land use management to address the housing issue in South Africa. Central to housing is section 26 of the Constitution, that has received the extensive attention of the Constitutional Court. The court has not hesitated to criticize the continuing existence of spatial injustice, thus contributing to the transformation of spatial injustice to spatial justice. Since planning, housing and land reform are all intertwined not only the role of SPLUMA, but also the NDP and the myriad other policies, programmes and legislation that are attempting to address the situation are examined and tested against the components of the principle of spatial justice in SPLUMA.


2021 ◽  
pp. 147035722095737
Author(s):  
Anders Björkvall ◽  
Arlene Archer

Research in fields such as multimodality and semiotics has focused on creation of value in different forms: aesthetic, economic and symbolic. However, the destruction of value has attracted much less attention. The aim of this article is to identify social, semiotic and ideological functions of acts of destruction based on an analysis of the traces these acts leave on the urban environment. Five overarching acts of destruction are discussed, but the authors’ main focus is on what they call transformation-driven and social presence-driven destruction, with two examples from Sweden and South Africa. The article discusses sanctioned destructive acts that are largely in compliance with dominating semiotic regimes at a certain time and place, as well as disruptive actions that challenge or even disobey those regimes. The analysis shows how a distinction between sanctioned and disruptive is in no way clear and often depends on complex power distributions between semiotic regimes at a given time and place. In fact, traces in the physical environment that may point to or index highly destructive acts can, in relation to other semiotic regimes, be regarded as creative and constructive. The authors argue that the semiotic processes of destruction and the traces they leave deserve more attention from research in the fields of multimodality and semiotics.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document