Sparse Inversion of the Coupled Marchenko Equations for Simultaneous Source Wavelet and Focusing Functions Estimation

Author(s):  
T.S. Becker ◽  
M. Ravasi ◽  
D.-. van Manen ◽  
F. Broggini ◽  
J.O.A. Robertsson
2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (8) ◽  
pp. 625-629 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiawen Song ◽  
Peiming Li ◽  
Zhongping Qian ◽  
Mugang Zhang ◽  
Pengyuan Sun ◽  
...  

Compared with conventional seismic acquisition methods, simultaneous-source acquisition utilizes independent shooting that allows for source interference, which reduces the time and cost of acquisition. However, additional processing is required to separate the interfering sources. Here, we present an inversion-based deblending method, which distinguishes signal from blending noise based on coherency differences in 3D receiver gathers. We first transform the seismic data into the frequency-wavenumber-wavenumber domain and impose a sparse constraint to estimate the coherent signal. We then subtract the estimated signal from the original input to predict the interference noise. Driven by data residuals, the signal is updated iteratively with shrinking thresholds until the signal and noise fully separate. We test our presented method on two 3D field data sets to demonstrate how the method proficiently separates interfering vibroseis sources with high fidelity.


2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 471a1-471a11 ◽  
Author(s):  
David F. Halliday ◽  
Ian Moore

Separation algorithms for marine simultaneous-source data generally require encoded sources. Proposed encoding schemes include random time delays (time dithers), periodic time sequences (such as those referred to as seismic apparition), and periodic phase sequences (for sources with fully controlled phase like a marine vibrator). At a given frequency, time dithers spread energy at a given wavenumber over all wavenumbers, phase sequences shift the energy by a fixed wavenumber (independent of frequency), and time sequences split energy over multiple wavenumbers in a frequency-dependent way. The way the encoding scheme distributes energy in the wavenumber domain is important because separation algorithms generally assume that, in the absence of encoding, all energy falls into the signal cone. Time dithering allows separation by inversion. At low frequencies, the inverse problem is overdetermined and easily solved. At higher frequencies, sparse inversion works well, provided the data exhibit a sufficiently sparse representation (consistent with compressive sensing theory). Phase sequencing naturally separates the sources in the wavenumber domain at low frequencies. At higher frequencies, ambiguities must be resolved using assumptions such as limited dispersion and limited complexity. Time sequencing allows a simple separation at low frequencies based on a scaling and subtraction process in the wavenumber domain. However, the scaling becomes unstable near notch frequencies, including DC. At higher frequencies, a similar problem to that for phase sequencing must be solved. The encoding schemes, therefore, have similar overall properties and require similar assumptions, but differ in some potentially important details. Phase sequencing is clearly only applicable to phase-controllable sources, and the different encoding schemes have other implications for data acquisition, for example, with respect to operational complexity, efficiency, spatial sampling, and tolerance to errors.


2021 ◽  
Vol 69 (2) ◽  
pp. 497-507
Author(s):  
Yajie Wei ◽  
Jingjie Cao ◽  
Xiaogang Huang ◽  
Xue Chen ◽  
Zhicheng Cai

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weilin Huang ◽  
Runqiu Wang ◽  
Xiangbo Gong ◽  
Yangkang Chen

Geophysics ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 77 (3) ◽  
pp. A9-A12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kees Wapenaar ◽  
Joost van der Neut ◽  
Jan Thorbecke

Deblending of simultaneous-source data is usually considered to be an underdetermined inverse problem, which can be solved by an iterative procedure, assuming additional constraints like sparsity and coherency. By exploiting the fact that seismic data are spatially band-limited, deblending of densely sampled sources can be carried out as a direct inversion process without imposing these constraints. We applied the method with numerically modeled data and it suppressed the crosstalk well, when the blended data consisted of responses to adjacent, densely sampled sources.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document