frequency domain
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

19994
(FIVE YEARS 5233)

H-INDEX

142
(FIVE YEARS 26)

Author(s):  
Mauricio Sanabria-Villamizar ◽  
Maximiliano Bueno-López ◽  
Jesus C. Hernández ◽  
David Vera

2022 ◽  
Vol 167 ◽  
pp. 108516
Author(s):  
Xianjun Pei ◽  
Sandipp Krishnan Ravi ◽  
Pingsha Dong ◽  
Xiangwei Li ◽  
Xiaokun Zhou

2022 ◽  
Vol 165 ◽  
pp. 108329
Author(s):  
Pieter-Jan Daems ◽  
Cédric Peeters ◽  
Patrick Guillaume ◽  
Jan Helsen

Ultrasonics ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 119 ◽  
pp. 106601
Author(s):  
Edo Bagus Prastika ◽  
Taichi Shintani ◽  
Tomohiro Kawashima ◽  
Yoshinobu Murakami ◽  
Naohiro Hozumi ◽  
...  

2022 ◽  
Vol 102 ◽  
pp. 115-136
Author(s):  
N. Benatia ◽  
A. El Kacimi ◽  
O. Laghrouche ◽  
M. El Alaoui Talibi ◽  
J. Trevelyan

2022 ◽  
Vol 187 ◽  
pp. 108506
Author(s):  
N. Hu ◽  
S. Utyuzhnikov

Author(s):  
Mohd Atif Siddiqui ◽  
Md Nishat Anwar ◽  
Shahedul Haque Laskar

Purpose This paper aims to present an efficient and simplified proportional-integral/proportional-integral and derivative controller design method for the higher-order stable and integrating processes with time delay in the cascade control structure (CCS). Design/methodology/approach Two approaches based on model matching in the frequency domain have been proposed for tuning the controllers of the CCS. The first approach is based on achieving the desired load disturbance rejection performance, whereas the second approach is proposed to achieve the desired setpoint performance. In both the approaches, matching between the desired model and the closed-loop system with the controller is done at a low-frequency point. Model matching at low-frequency points yields a linear algebraic equation and the solution to these equations yields the controller parameters. Findings Simulations have been conducted on several examples covering high order stable, integrating, double integrating processes with time delay and nonlinear continuous stirred tank reactor. The performance of the proposed scheme has been compared with recently reported work having modified cascade control configurations, sliding mode control, model predictive control and fractional order control. The performance of both the proposed schemes is either better or comparable with the recently reported methods. However, the proposed method based on desired load disturbance rejection performance outperforms among all these schemes. Originality/value The main advantages of the proposed approaches are that they are directly applicable to any order processes, as they are free from time delay approximation and plant order reduction. In addition to this, the proposed schemes are capable of handling a wide range of different dynamical processes in a unified way.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document