Application Of Empirical Wavelet Transform In Coherent Noise Attenuation In High Frequency Marine Seismic Data

Author(s):  
L. Wei Yi ◽  
R. Hamidi ◽  
D. Ghosh ◽  
M. Hermana ◽  
H. Soleimani ◽  
...  
2008 ◽  
Vol 32 (8) ◽  
pp. 1309-1314
Author(s):  
Jin-Hoo Kim ◽  
Sung-Bo Kim ◽  
Hyun-Do Kim ◽  
Chan-Soo Kim

2017 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucas José Andrade de Almeida ◽  
Rafael Rodrigues Manenti ◽  
Milton J. Porsani

ABSTRACT. Radial transform rearranges amplitudes of seismic data, from distance-time domain to angle-time domain. Linear events in distance-time domain tend to e sampled as a vertical event in angle-time domain, while seismic...Keywords: reflection seismic, noise attenuation, signal processing, multi-resolution analysis. RESUMO. A transformada radial faz um remapeamento das amplitudes do dado sísmico do domínio espaço tempo para o domínio ângulo-tempo. Eventos lineares no primeiro domínio tendem...Palavras-chave: sísmica de reflexão, atenuação de ruídos, processamento de sinais, análise de multirresolução.


Geophysics ◽  
1983 ◽  
Vol 48 (7) ◽  
pp. 854-886 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ken Larner ◽  
Ron Chambers ◽  
Mai Yang ◽  
Walt Lynn ◽  
Willon Wai

Despite significant advances in marine streamer design, seismic data are often plagued by coherent noise having approximately linear moveout across stacked sections. With an understanding of the characteristics that distinguish such noise from signal, we can decide which noise‐suppression techniques to use and at what stages to apply them in acquisition and processing. Three general mechanisms that might produce such noise patterns on stacked sections are examined: direct and trapped waves that propagate outward from the seismic source, cable motion caused by the tugging action of the boat and tail buoy, and scattered energy from irregularities in the water bottom and sub‐bottom. Depending upon the mechanism, entirely different noise patterns can be observed on shot profiles and common‐midpoint (CMP) gathers; these patterns can be diagnostic of the dominant mechanism in a given set of data. Field data from Canada and Alaska suggest that the dominant noise is from waves scattered within the shallow sub‐buttom. This type of noise, while not obvious on the shot records, is actually enhanced by CMP stacking. Moreover, this noise is not confined to marine data; it can be as strong as surface wave noise on stacked land seismic data as well. Of the many processing tools available, moveout filtering is best for suppressing the noise while preserving signal. Since the scattered noise does not exhibit a linear moveout pattern on CMP‐sorted gathers, moveout filtering must be applied either to traces within shot records and common‐receiver gathers or to stacked traces. Our data example demonstrates that although it is more costly, moveout filtering of the unstacked data is particularly effective because it conditions the data for the critical data‐dependent processing steps of predictive deconvolution and velocity analysis.


Geophysics ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 191-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Frank Linville ◽  
Robert A. Meek

Primary reflections in seismic records are often obscured by coherent noise making processing and interpretation difficult. Trapped water modes, surface waves, scattered waves, air waves, and tube waves to name a few, must be removed early in the processing sequence to optimize subsequent processing and imaging. We have developed a noise canceling algorithm that effectively removes many of the commonly encountered noise trains in seismic data. All currently available techniques for coherent noise attenuation suffer from limitations that introduce unacceptable signal distortions and artifacts. Also, most of those techniques impose the dual stringent requirements of equal and fine spatial sampling in the field acquisition of seismic data. Our technique takes advantage of characteristics usually found in coherent noise such as being localized in time, highly aliased, nondispersive (or only mildly so), and exhibit a variety of moveout patterns across the seismic records. When coherent noise is localized in time, a window much like a surgical mute is drawn around the noise. The algorithm derives an estimate of the noise in the window, automatically correcting for amplitude and phase differences, and adaptively subtracts this noise from the window of data. This signal estimate is then placed back in the record. In a model and a land data example, the algorithm removes noise more effectively with less signal distortion than does f-k filtering or velocity notch filtering. Downgoing energy in a vertical seismic profile (VSP) with irregular receiver spacing is also removed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document