Mobile IPv6

2014 ◽  
pp. 71-101
Author(s):  
Tayo Arulogun ◽  
Ahmad AlSa'deh ◽  
Christoph Meinel
Keyword(s):  
Mobility Management ◽  
Defense Mechanisms ◽  
Internet Protocol ◽  
Mobile Node ◽  
Mobile Ipv6 ◽  
Mobile Internet ◽  
Ip Address ◽  
Mobile Internet Protocol ◽  
General Improvement ◽  
User Intervention

Mobile Internet Protocol (MIP) enables a mobile node to be recognized via a single IP address while the node moves between different networks. MIP attains the connectivity to nodes everywhere without user intervention. One general improvement in Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6) compared to MIPv4 is the enhanced security. However, there are areas still susceptible to various kinds of attacks. Security approaches for the MIPv6 are still in progress and there are few unsolved concerns and problems. This chapter focuses on MIPv6 security considerations, potential threats, and possible defense mechanisms. The authors discuss and analyze in detail the MIPv6 mobility management and security approaches with respect to the efficiency and complexity and bring forward some constructive recommendations.

scholarly journals Analisis Perbandingan Performansi MIPv6 (Mobile Internet Protocol v6) dan HMIPv6 (Hierarchical Mobile Internet Protocol v6) pada VANET (Vehicular Ad-Hoc Network)

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-26
Author(s):  
Iqsyahiro Kresna ◽  
Yoso Adi Setyoko ◽  
Aditya Wijayanto
Keyword(s):  
Ad Hoc Network ◽  
Ad Hoc ◽  
Mobile Ad Hoc Network ◽  
Internet Protocol ◽  
Mobile Node ◽  
Mobile Ipv6 ◽  
Mobile Internet ◽  
Vehicular Ad Hoc Network ◽  
Ip Address ◽  
Mobile Internet Protocol

VANET (Vehicular Ad-Hoc Network) adalah bentuk khusus dari MANET (Mobile Ad-Hoc Network). VANET (Vehicular Ad-Hoc Network) adalah jaringan yang terdiri dari kumpulan node mobile nirkabel yang berkomunikasi satu sama lain tanpa infrastruktur yang tetap. Pergerakan MN (Mobile Node) pada VANET sangat tinggi dan menyebabkan IP Address pada MN sering berubah. Berdasarkan kondisi jaringan yang berubah, koneksi yang terjadi antara MN menjadi terganggu dan terputus selama beberapa detik. Selain itu, menyebabkan delay yang besar dan throughput yang lebih kecil dengan paket loss tinggi jika di suatu daerah jumlah MN meningkat secara signifikan. Dalam simulasi ini diukur kinerja antara jaringan Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6) dan Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 (HMIPv6) menggunakan agen transport UDP dengan beberapa ukuran paket data CBR. Berdasarkan parameter utama dalam menentukan kualitas jaringan, akan dibandingkan dan diperoleh nilai dari handover latensi, dengan mengukur packet loss, throughput, dan delay. Berdasarkan hasil studi literatur, dapat disimpulkan bahwa kinerja jaringan HMIPv6 lebih baik daripada MIPv6 karena HMIPv6 memiliki paket loss dan delay yang lebih kecil dan throughput yang lebih besar dibandingkan dengan MIPv6.

scholarly journals Partial Bicasting with Buffering for Proxy Mobile IPV6 Mobility Management in CoAP-Based IoT Networks

Electronics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 598
Author(s):  
Moneeb Gohar ◽  
Sajid Anwar ◽  
Moazam Ali ◽  
Jin-Ghoo Choi ◽  
Hani Alquhayz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mobility Management ◽  
Mobile Node ◽  
Mobile Internet ◽  
Message Delivery ◽  
Packet Losses ◽  
Data Packets ◽  
Mobile Access ◽  
End To End Delay ◽  
Mobile Internet Protocol ◽  
Ipv6 Mobility

Constrained application protocol (CoAP) can be used for message delivery in wireless sensor networks. Although CoAP-based proxy mobile internet protocol (PMIP) was proposed for mobility management, it resulted in handover delay and packet loss. Therefore, an enhanced PMIP version 6, with partial bicasting in CoAP-based internet of things (IoT) networks, is proposed. Here, when an IoT device moved into a new network, the corresponding mobile access gateway (MAG) updated the local mobility anchor (LMA) binding. Further, LMA initiated the “partial” bicasting of data packets to the new and the previous MAGs. The data packets were buffered at the new MAG during handover and were forwarded to Mobile Node (MN) after the handover operations. The proposed scheme was compared with the existing scheme, using ns-3 simulations. We demonstrated that the proposed scheme reduced handover delays, packet losses, end-to-end delay, throughput, and energy consumption, compared to the existing scheme.

scholarly journals Protocol Verification of Translation in Mobile Internet Protocol Version 4 and 6

2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 149-158
Author(s):  
Susanna S. Henry ◽  
◽  
B. Vijay Kumar ◽  
V. Santhosh Kumar ◽  
Gurwinder Singh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Internet Protocol ◽  
Mobile Internet ◽  
Protocol Verification ◽  
Mobile Internet Protocol

Mobile Internet protocol

2001 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Samjani
Keyword(s):  
Internet Protocol ◽  
Mobile Internet ◽  
Mobile Internet Protocol

scholarly journals Lightweight Handover Control Function (L-HCF) for Mobile Internet Protocol version Six (IPv6)

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rania A. Mokhtar ◽  
A. F. Ismail ◽  
Mohammad Kamrul Hasan ◽  
Wahidah Hashim ◽  
Hajir Abbas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Control Function ◽  
Internet Protocol ◽  
Mobile Internet ◽  
Mobile Internet Protocol
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document