Professional Learning through MOOCs?

Author(s):  
Jason M. Lodge ◽  
Melinda J. Lewis

This chapter will locate debates around MOOCs within a discussion on the purposes of higher education for professional learning and trends for trans-disciplinary approaches in designs for networked learning. The authors revisit the meaning of a ‘higher' education in contemporary tertiary contexts and within professional learning degrees and also examine the types of expertise required when designing for and facilitating learning in a MOOC open-style environment. In response to these aims, they offer a trans-disciplinary framework (Wadsworth, 2010) drawn from complex systems thinking in health, community and human services, to assist our enquiry into educational innovation. The authors suggest that a more nuanced understanding of the types of expertise required by those involved in macro-level learning occurring in MOOCs will lead towards a greater role in creating the next generation of multi-professional experts. They draw from the learning sciences, epistemologies on ways of being and becoming, and innovations with educational technologies.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans Kuijper

The fast developments of (complex) systems thinking cannot be understood without taking the cultural and philosophical context into consideration. In this article, An attempt is made to explain the foundation of thriving CHINESE systems thinking, because China seems to fully undertand the significance and importance of thinking (and engineering) systemically. The conclusion of the paper is two-pronged: (a) the Chinese have been system thinkers (or pattern seekers) from the very beginning of their turbulent history and (B) Western system thinkers, who disagree with each other on many fronts, could, nay should learn something from ancient China, particularly from that amazing, almost forgotten classical book called the Yijing, a book about systems science in a nutshell.


2016 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua Danish ◽  
Asmalina Saleh ◽  
Alejandro Andrade ◽  
Branden Bryan

2020 ◽  
pp. 207-222
Author(s):  
David Stephen ◽  
Craig Stephen ◽  
Luis Pedro Carmo ◽  
John Berezowski

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Rene J Zweedijk ◽  

A proposition is made for scientific substantiation of “Primary respiration” and related concepts, including suggestions for future research. For research and support, the field of mathematics, artificial intelligence, chaos theory and complex systems thinking can be of fundamental and essential value.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document