Top-Hole Formation Pore Pressure Assessment at Deepwater Well Sites Using a Geotechnical Approach

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aurelian C. Trandafir ◽  
William C. Haneberg
Author(s):  
Mohammad Farsi ◽  
Nima Mohamadian ◽  
Hamzeh Ghorbani ◽  
David A. Wood ◽  
Shadfar Davoodi ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-92
Author(s):  
Yuliy A. Dashevsky ◽  
Semen Petrov ◽  
Alexandr N. Vasilevskiy ◽  
Oleg B. Bocharov ◽  
Gleb V. Dyatlov

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy A. Greenwood ◽  
Michael Raymond Dautel ◽  
Richard Buchanan Russell

Geofluids ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Xiaohui Sun ◽  
Youqiang Liao ◽  
Zhiyuan Wang ◽  
XinXin Zhao ◽  
Baojiang Sun

Identifying and controlling a kicking well hinge on quickly obtaining reliable and accurate formation pore pressure. In this study, we derive an analytical model for estimating formation pore pressure when a gas kick occurs during tight reservoir drilling. The model considers the variations in gas volume and pressures in the annulus affected by mutual coupling between the wellbore and formation, as well as bubble migration and expansion in the annulus. Additionally, a numerical computation method that reduces the effect of measurement noise using the Hooke-Jeeves algorithm is proposed. The method is capable of estimating pore pressure during the early stage of a kick in real time, is robust to the inherit noise of the measurements, and can be applied in scenarios when a well shut-in process cannot be performed. The simulation results demonstrate that both kick simulation and formation pore pressure inversion can be conducted via the proposed methodology. The errors of the pore pressure estimating results are less than 2.03% compared to the field data of seven wells. The method is tested and validated to be robust to noise and maintain good convergence performance, thereby providing drilling engineers with a simple and quick way to estimate pore pressure during a kick.


2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-103
Author(s):  
A. Ogbamikhumi ◽  
O.M. Hamid-Osazuwa ◽  
E.A. Imoru

Understanding the distribution and variation of subsurface formation pressure is key to preventing geo-hazards associated with drilling activities such as kicks and blow out. To assess and prevent such risk in drilling offset wells in the Hamoru field, prediction of pore pressure was done to understand the pressure regime of the field using well logs in the absence of seismic data. Two commonly used methods for formation pressure prediction; Bower’s and Eaton’s methods were adopted to predict pore pressure and determine the better of the two methods that will be more suitable for the field. The cross-plot of Vp against density disclosed that compaction disequilibrium is the prevalent overpressure mechanism. The prediction of Pore pressure with Eaton’s method gave results comparable to the acquired pressure in the field, typical of what is expected when compaction disequilibrium is the dominant overpressure mechanism. Since the result of Bower’s method over estimated formation pressure, Eaton’s method appears to be the better choice for predicting the formation pore pressure in the field. Analysis of the predicted pore pressure reveals the onset of overpressure at depth of 2.44 km. The formation pressure gradient ranges from 10.4 kPa/m to 15.2 kPa/m interpreted as mild to moderately over pressure. Keywords: Geohazard, over-pressure, Eaton’s method, Bower’s method, normal compaction trend


SPE Journal ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 16 (04) ◽  
pp. 1010-1028 ◽  
Author(s):  
Minh H. Tran ◽  
Younane N. Abousleiman ◽  
Vinh X. Nguyen

Summary The effects of filter-cake buildup and/or filter-cake-property variation with time on wellbore stability have been plaguing the industry. The increasing use of lost-circulation materials (LCMs) in recent years for wellbore strengthening in weak and/or depleted formations necessitates models that can predict these effects. However, the complexities of effective-stress and pore-pressure evolution around the borehole while drilling, coupled with the transient variation of mud-filtration properties, have delayed such modeling efforts. In this paper, the analytical solutions for the time-dependent effects of mudcake buildup and mudcake properties on the wellbore stresses and formation pore pressure, and thus the safe-drilling-mud-weight window, are derived. The transient effects of mudcake buildup and mudcake buildup coupled with its permeability reduction during filtration on the safe-drilling-mudweight window are illustrated through numerical examples. The results showed that the safe-mudweight windows were greatly affected by the buildup of filter cake and its permeability variation. For example, the analysis for filter-cake buildup with cake permeability of 10–2 md showed that the safe-mudweight window was widened by 0.5 g/cc after 2.5 hours post-excavation when compared to the case of a wellbore without mudcake. On the other hand, a lower mudcake permeability of 10–3 md widened the mudweight window by as much as 1 g/cc. Last but not least, the analyses revealed that even for mudcake permeability as low as 10–3 md, neglecting the permeable nature of the mudcake can result in overestimation of the safe-drilling-mudweight window.


Author(s):  
J. Park ◽  
I. Viken ◽  
J.C. Choi ◽  
B. Bohloli ◽  
Ø. Godager ◽  
...  

Identification of geo-hazard zones using pore pressure analysis in ‘MAC’ field was carried out in this research. Suite of wireline logs from four wells and RFT pressure data from two wells were utilized. Lithologic identification was done using gamma ray log. Resistivity log was used to delineate hydrocarbon and non-hydrocarbon formations. Well log correlation helps to see the lateral continuity of the sands. Pore pressure prediction was done using integrated approaches. The general lithology identified is alternation of sand and shale units. The stratigraphy is typical of Agbada Formation. Three reservoirs delineated were laterally correlated. Crossplot of Vp against density (Rho) colour coded with depth revealed that disequilibrium compaction is the main overpressure generating mechanism in the field. Prediction of overpressure by normal compaction trend was generated and plot of interval transit time against depth show that there is normal compaction from 250m to about 1700 m on MAC-01, but at a depth of about 1800m, there was abnormal pressure build up that shows the onset of overpressure. A relatively normal compaction was observed on MAC-02 until a depth of about 2100m where overpressure was suspected. The prediction of formation pore pressure using Eaton’s and Bower’s method to determine the better of the two methods to adopt for pore pressure prediction shows that the pore pressure prediction using Eaton’s method gave a better result similar to the acquired pressure in the field. Hence Eaton’s method appears to be better suited for formation pore pressure estimation in ‘MAC’ field. The validation of the pore pressure analysis results with available acquired pressure data affirmed the confidence in the interpreted results for this study.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document