scholarly journals Absence of Residual Microcalcifications in Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia Diagnosed via Stereotactic Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy: Is Surgical Excision Obviated?

2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 265 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inyoung Youn ◽  
Min Jung Kim ◽  
Hee Jung Moon ◽  
Eun-Kyung Kim
2008 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. 3232-3238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter R. Eby ◽  
Jennifer E. Ochsner ◽  
Wendy B. DeMartini ◽  
Kimberly H. Allison ◽  
Sue Peacock ◽  
...  

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 1120
Author(s):  
Luca Nicosia ◽  
Antuono Latronico ◽  
Francesca Addante ◽  
Rossella De Santis ◽  
Anna Carla Bozzini ◽  
...  

(1) Background: to evaluate which factors can reduce the upgrade rate of atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) to in situ or invasive carcinoma in patients who underwent vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VABB) and subsequent surgical excision. (2) Methods: 2955 VABBs were reviewed; 141 patients with a diagnosis of ADH were selected for subsequent surgical excision. The association between patients’ characteristics and the upgrade rate to breast cancer was evaluated in both univariate and multivariate analyses. (3) Results: the upgrade rates to ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and invasive carcinoma (IC) were, respectively, 29.1% and 7.8%. The pooled upgrade rate to DCIS or IC was statistically lower at univariate analysis, considering the following parameters: complete removal of the lesion (p-value < 0.001); BIRADS ≤ 4a (p-value < 0.001); size of the lesion ≤15 mm (p-value: 0.002); age of the patients <50 years (p-value: 0.035). (4) Conclusions: the overall upgrade rate of ADH to DCIS or IC is high and, as already known, surgery should be recommended. However, ADH cases should always be discussed in multidisciplinary meetings: some parameters appear to be related to a lower upgrade rate. Patients presenting these parameters could be strictly followed up to avoid overtreatment.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda L Amin ◽  
Onalisa D Winblad ◽  
Allison H Zupon ◽  
Fang Fan ◽  
Ossama Tawfik ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose NCCN guidelines recommend surgical excision for all patients with atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) on percutaneous biopsy. Improved imaging and biopsy techniques have lower contemporary upgrade rates, challenging standard practice. Methods A retrospective analysis identified 87 percutaneous biopsies diagnosing ADH who underwent surgical excision at a single institution from 01/2008 to 10/2015. Imaging was reviewed for lesion size and residual calcifications. Biopsy slides were reviewed for ADH features. Categorical variables were analyzed using Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests; continuous variables with T- and Wilcoxon tests. Logistic regression model was used to determine association between odds of upgrade and number of low-risk features. Results Upgrade was identified in 13 cases (14.9%; 11 ductal carcinoma in situ and 2 invasive breast cancer). Imaging features associated with lowest risk of upgrade included imaging size < 1cm (p = 0.004) and > 50% removed by biopsy (p = 0.03). The only pathologic feature significantly associated with upgrade was the presence of micropapillary features (p = 0.10), with lower extent of ADH (1–2 foci, p = 0.12) trending toward significance. Those with the lowest risk of upgrade (0%) had all 4 low risk features (n = 17, 20%). The loss of a low-risk feature increased the odds of upgrade by 189% (OR = 1.89, 95% CI 0.241,0.742, p = 0.001). Conclusion Contemporary imaging and biopsy techniques have resulted in lower upgrade rates for ADH. Patients at lowest risk for upgrade can be identified using a scoring system and may be safely offered active surveillance over surgical excision.


2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 893-899 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristin E. Williams ◽  
Amanda Amin ◽  
Jacqueline Hill ◽  
Carissa Walter ◽  
Marc Inciardi ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gustavo Machado Badan ◽  
Decio Roveda Júnior ◽  
Sebastião Piato ◽  
Eduardo de Faria Castro Fleury ◽  
Mário Sérgio Dantas Campos ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective: To determine the rates of diagnostic underestimation at stereotactic percutaneous core needle biopsies (CNB) and vacuum-assisted biopsies (VABB) of nonpalpable breast lesions, with histopathological results of atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) subsequently submitted to surgical excision. As a secondary objective, the frequency of ADH and DCIS was determined for the cases submitted to biopsy. Materials and Methods: Retrospective review of 40 cases with diagnosis of ADH or DCIS on the basis of biopsies performed between February 2011 and July 2013, subsequently submitted to surgery, whose histopathological reports were available in the internal information system. Biopsy results were compared with those observed at surgery and the underestimation rate was calculated by means of specific mathematical equations. Results: The underestimation rate at CNB was 50% for ADH and 28.57% for DCIS, and at VABB it was 25% for ADH and 14.28% for DCIS. ADH represented 10.25% of all cases undergoing biopsy, whereas DCIS accounted for 23.91%. Conclusion: The diagnostic underestimation rate at CNB is two times the rate at VABB. Certainty that the target has been achieved is not the sole determining factor for a reliable diagnosis. Removal of more than 50% of the target lesion should further reduce the risk of underestimation.


The Breast ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Flora Zagouri ◽  
Theodoros N. Sergentanis ◽  
Dimitra Koulocheri ◽  
Aphrodite Nonni ◽  
John Bramis ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 60-60
Author(s):  
Jennifer Kay Plichta ◽  
Natalia Rumas ◽  
Constantine V. Godellas ◽  
Claudia Beth Perez

60 Background: Standard follow-up imaging for women with a history of breast cancer is well defined, but the appropriate screening guidelines for other high risk breast lesions, such as atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), remain unclear. Current practices often parallel those of cancer patients and include a 6 month interval mammogram prior to resuming annual screening, which may be unnecessary. As such, it is critical to evaluate the utility of the current standard practice of additional screening beyond a routine annual mammogram. Methods: Our pathology database was queried for the phrase "atypical ductal hyperplasia" from 2008 to 2010, and patients who underwent surgical excision were identified. Those who did not have subsequent follow up at our institution were excluded. Results: There were 44 patients who underwent excisional biopsies that were diagnosed with ADH and proceeded with follow up. In addition to a routine clinical exam, a short-term follow up diagnostic mammogram was performed in 24 patients. The median age was 56.5 years, and the median breast cancer risk assessment scores were 2.8% at 5 years and 13.4% lifetime. Of the 24 interval mammograms, 21 yielded benign findings on initial imaging (BIRADS 2), while 3 patients (12.5%) required additional imaging that ultimately resulted in benign findings. There were only 4 patients with a lifetime risk ≥25%, and all of these patients had benign findings on their initial imaging and resumed routine follow up. To date, 22 patients have received at least one additional mammogram, and all subsequent findings have been benign. No additional biopsies or surgeries have been performed. Conclusions: In sum, a clinical exam is still recommended at 6 months following surgical excision for a diagnosis of ADH. In the post-surgical breast, imaging may be misleading and result in psychological distress for patients and possibly unnecessary procedures. Based on our findings, a 6-month follow up mammogram is not recommended and patients should resume annual surveillance.


2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (26_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alvaro Pena ◽  
Robert T. Fazzio ◽  
Sejal Shah ◽  
Tanya L. Hoskin ◽  
Rushin D Brahmbhatt ◽  
...  

3 Background: Atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) is a high-risk breast lesion usually diagnosed with core needle biopsy. Although upgraded to cancer at surgical excision in ~15 to 25% of cases, routine excision is questioned due to cost and overtreatment. We evaluated clinical, imaging, and histologic features associated with cancer upgrade and developed a multivariate model to predict risk of upgrade. Methods: With IRB approval a single institution retrospective review was performed of patients who underwent surgical excision of ADH diagnosed by core biopsy from 06/2005 to 06/2013. Review was performed of electronic records, breast imagin,g and biopsy slides. Multiple imputations were used for missing data. Association of cancer upgrade with various features was assessed with logistic regression. Results: 409 biopsies with ADH on core biopsy, with later surgical excision, were included. The overall upgrade rate was (16.1%, 95% CI:12.9-20.0%); 10 patients had invasive cancer at excision and 56 DCIS only. Features on core biopsy most strongly associated with upgrade were imaging estimated percent of lesion removed (upgrade 9% for 90% removed, 14% for 50 to 75%, and 27% for < 50% removed), individual cell necrosis (upgrade 34% with necrosis vs. 9.5% without), and # foci of ADH (22% for >1 focus vs 8% for 1 focus). A multivariate predictive model (see Table) showed an average C-statistic of 0.77. Women with no necrosis and either 1 focus with ≥ 50% removal or >1 focus with 90% removal (36% of the sample) have low risk of upgrade (5.0%, 95% CI:1.3-8.7%). Conclusions: ADH on core biopsy with low risk of upgrade to cancer is defined by percent of imaging lesion removed, # of foci of ADH, and lack of individual cell necrosis. If findings are validated, women whose biopsies meet low-risk criteria might be considered for chemoprevention and surveillance rather than surgical excision.[Table: see text]


2000 ◽  
Vol 175 (5) ◽  
pp. 1341-1346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marla L. Rosenfield Darling ◽  
Darrell N. Smith ◽  
Susan C. Lester ◽  
Carolyn Kaelin ◽  
Donna-Lee G. Selland ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document