Background: Humerus shaft fracture is one of the most common orthopedic problems, accounting for approximately 5%
of all fractures. This study aimed to compare the surgical treatment results of humerus shaft fractures by intramedullary
nailing and palate.
Methods: This study was performed as a retrospective cohort. Eighty patients were referred to the Madani hospital with humerus shaft fracture,
of which 40 patients were treated with either IMN or palate methods. All patients were followed up in outpatient clinics at six weeks and 3 and 6
months. Evaluation of the results was evaluated based on performance improvement, ability to return to previous jobs after six months, time of
union formation, rate of union formation, and incidence of complications. Data were analyzed using the SPSS program.
Results: The mean amount of blood lost during the operation and the duration of surgery in the IMN group were signicantly lower than the DCP
group (P <0.05), but there was no signicant difference between the two groups in terms of length of hospital stay (P> 0.05). On the other hand,
the mean of Constant and ASES criteria and the frequency of unions in the two groups were not signicantly different (P> 0.05).
Conclusion: The present study results showed that the rate of intraoperative bleeding and duration of surgery in the IMN group was signicantly
lower than the DCP group. Still, there was no signicant difference between the two groups in terms of length of hospital stay and functional
criteria.