Abstract
Background: The purpose of this retrospective clinical study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of mineralized collagen (MC) versus Bio-Oss for immediate implant implantation in esthetic area. Methods: Medical records of Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of Shandong Provincial Hospital were screened for patients who had been treated with immediate implant implantation in the esthetic area using either MC( Allgens®) or Bio-Oss®, between January 2018 and December 2019. All patients fulfilling the in-/exclusion criteria and following for a minimum period of 1 year after surgery were enrolled into the presented study. Implant survival rate, radiographic, esthetic and patient satisfactory evaluations were performed.Results: Altogether, 70 patients were included in the study; a total of 80 implants were inserted. All implants had good initial stability after implantation. The survival rate of implants was 100% at 1-year follow-up. The differences in horizontal and vertical bone loss between the Trail group (0.72±0.26mm, 1.62±0.84mm) and the Control group (0.70±0.52 mm, 1.57±0.88mm) were statistically no significant at 6 months after permanent restoration. Similar results occurred at 12 months after permanent restoration. Clinical acceptability defined by PES ≥ 6 (6.07±1.62 vs. 6.13±1.41) was not significantly different between groups. Patient satisfaction estimated by VAS was similar (8.56±1.12 vs. 8.27±1.44), and the difference was not statistically significant between the two groups.Conclusions: The biomimetic MC seems to be a suitable and feasible option for bone graft material in immediate implant implantation.
Immediate implant placement in conjunction with a DFDBA graft and resorbable membrane: A 1-10 year retrospective clinical study
