Effect of nitrous oxide inhalation on induction dose of propofol, induction time, oxygen saturation, and hemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and intubation

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 99
Author(s):  
Rajan Sunil ◽  
SarathVijayakrishna Pillai ◽  
Kumar Lakshmi
2012 ◽  
Vol 116 (5) ◽  
pp. 1047-1056 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyejin Jeong ◽  
Seongtae Jeong ◽  
Hoi J. Lim ◽  
JongUn Lee ◽  
Kyung Y. Yoo

Background We examined the effects of different anesthetics on cerebral oxygenation and systemic hemodynamics in patients undergoing surgery in beach chair position (BCP). Jugular venous bulb oxygen saturation (SjvO2) and regional cerebral tissue oxygen saturation (SctO2) were determined while patients were placed from the supine to BCP. Whether SctO2 and SjvO2 are interchangeable in assessing the cerebral oxygenation was also examined. Methods Forty patients undergoing shoulder surgery in BCP were randomly assigned to receive sevoflurane-nitrous oxide (S/N) or propofol-remifentanil (P/R) anesthesia. Four patients taking angiotensin II receptor antagonists were excluded post hoc. Mean arterial pressure and heart rate, as well as SjvO2 and SctO2, were measured before (postinduction baseline in supine position) and after BCP. Results Mean arterial pressure decreased by BCP in both groups. It was, however, significantly higher in S/N (n = 19) than in P/R group (n = 17) at 7 to 8 min after the positioning. SjvO2 also significantly decreased after BCP in both groups, the magnitude of which was lower in S/N than in P/R group (11 ± 10% vs. 23 ± 9%, P = 0.0006). The incidences of SjvO2 <50% and mean arterial pressure less than 50 mmHg were lower in S/N group, but SctO2and the incidence of cerebral desaturation (more than 20% decrease from baseline) did not significantly differ between the groups. SctO2 and SjvO2 were only weakly correlated (β = 0.218, r2 = 0.133). Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean difference of -7.2% with 95% limit of agreement between -38.2% and 23.8%. Conclusions The margin of safety against impaired cerebral oxygenation is greater and SjvO2 is more preserved with S/N than with P/R anesthesia. SctO2 may not be reliable in detecting a low SjvO2 during the surgery in BCP.


2002 ◽  
Vol 95 (5) ◽  
pp. 1459-1460
Author(s):  
Lutz Schaffranietz ◽  
Christian Rudolph ◽  
Wolfgang Heinke

2000 ◽  
Vol 92 (4) ◽  
pp. 1043-1048 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshinori Nakata ◽  
Takahisa Goto ◽  
Hayato Saito ◽  
Yoshiki Ishiguro ◽  
Katsuo Terui ◽  
...  

Background Although anesthesia with xenon has been supplemented with fentanyl, its requirement has not been established. This study was conducted to determine the plasma concentrations of fentanyl necessary to suppress somatic and hemodynamic responses to surgical incision in 50% patients in the presence of 0.7 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) xenon. Methods Twenty-five patients were allocated randomly to predetermined fentanyl concentration between 0.5 and 4.0 ng/ml during 0.7 MAC xenon anesthesia. Fentanyl was administered using a pharmacokinetic model-driven computer-assisted continuous infusion device. At surgical incision each patient was monitored for somatic and hemodynamic responses. A somatic response was defined as any purposeful bodily movement. A positive hemodynamic response was defined as a more than 15% increase in heart rate or mean arterial pressure more than the preincision value. The concentrations of fentanyl to prevent somatic and hemodynamic responses in 50% of patients were calculated using logistic regression. Results The concentration of fentanyl to prevent a somatic response to skin incision in 50% of patients in the presence of 0.7 MAC xenon was 0.72 +/- 0.07 ng/ml and to prevent a hemodynamic response was 0.94 +/- 0.06 ng/ml. Conclusions Comparing these results with previously published results in the presence of 70% nitrous oxide, the fentanyl requirement in xenon anesthesia is smaller than that in the equianesthetic nitrous oxide anesthesia.


1991 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
pp. 481
Author(s):  
David J. Murray ◽  
Robert B. Forbes ◽  
David L. Dull ◽  
Larry T. Mahoney

1991 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. Murray ◽  
Robert B. Forbes ◽  
David L. Dull ◽  
Larry T. Mahoney

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document